The Engineer's Notebook Blog

The Engineer's Notebook

The Engineer's Notebook is a shared blog for entries that don't fit into a specific CR4 blog. Topics may range from grammar to physics and could be research or or an individual's thoughts - like you'd jot down in a well-used notebook.

Previous in Blog: The Worst Toys of 2007 – Part 1   Next in Blog: The Worst Toys of 2007 - Part 3
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

The Worst Toys of 2007 – Part 2

Posted November 15, 2007 5:01 PM by Steve Melito
Pathfinder Tags: China product design safety toys

Do groups such as WATCH help children have a safer holiday season? Or do they simply take the fun out of Christmas? Each year, World Against Toys Causing Harm (WATCH) publishes its annual "10 Worst Toys" list. Yesterday, The Y Files examined the top three items that WATCH wants Santa Claus to remove from his workshop. One contained lead paint. The others pose serious health hazards if used inappropriately.

Today, we'll look at the next four items on WATCH's list.

Editor's Note: Did you miss Part 1 of this series? Then click here.

The Un-fabulous Four

4. Dora the Explorer Lamp from Funhouse is available at Wal-Mart. Although the product's packaging warns that "this is an electric lamp – not a toy", WATCH complains that "the manufacturer's proclamation that the Dora cartoon character is not a toy has little meaning to small children, who may be attracted to the figurine." Well, that "attraction" is probably what manufacturer was hoping for!

5. Lil "Giddy Up" Horse – Sassy Pet Saks from Douglas features contradictory warnings. "A tag on the horse states that it is sold for newborn babies," the WATCH website explains, "whereas the carrier to which the horse is attached advises the toy is not intended for children younger than 18 months old." Would you rather leave the great labeling controversy to the lawyers? Let's look at the toy's components. The horse's small, wooden bead and removable "fiber-like hair" pose a choking hazard.

6. Spider Man 3 New Goblin Sword from Hasbro is available at Target. Remarkably, this toy is billed as "one of the most awesome weapons ever wielded by human hands". (I guess they haven't seen Del's crossbow!) Still, because this toy is designed for children instead of Green Berets, WATCH worries about its "potential to cause serious facial and other impact injuries". The sharpened sticks that imaginary swordsmen used to play with were dangerous, too.

7. Hip Hoppa 'Til You Droppa!, made or distributed by Spin Master Ltd. And Vivid Imaginations, Ltd., admits that "this toy should be used with caution since it requires great skill to avoid falls and collisions". That's not good enough for WATCH, however. Although the packaging "recommends the use of helmet, knee and elbow pads", the toy itself omits this information. After all, the age group that this toy targets (6+) can read.

Do these toys belong on WATCH's list? Or does the organization take the fun out of being a kid? Weigh in by commenting on this story, and then come back tomorrow for the conclusion of this three-part series.

Steve Melito - The Y Files

Add to Technorati Favorites

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 548
#1

Re: The Worst Toys of 2007 – Part 2

11/16/2007 4:19 PM

Again same old story , child should be left out to play in mud instead

Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Member in Good Standing

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lafayette, CO
Posts: 652
Good Answers: 61
#2

Re: The Worst Toys of 2007 – Part 2

11/17/2007 1:35 AM

I remember being a boy, and we use to do stuff that would give an in insurance agent a case of the shivering vapors, much less an organization like WATCH. Once we become adults we forget a simple fact. Kids are incredibly tough. Somehow they keep growing up into guys like me who write these posts.

It's not like we are giving our children swords and spears, guns, or live explosives. Though as a kid I did design a nuclear weapon, and most of us knew how to formulate our own explosives and other lethal toys. Yet somehow, most of us survived. I think sometimes we forget that fun does not depend on having thousands of dollars worth of toys, but upon "male and female created He them," with vigor and creative zeal (appologies to RAH). The way to raise kids is to give them enough freedom to be kids, not to try to insulate them from all possible harm.

__________________
DrMoose
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Walkersville, Md, USA
Posts: 139
#3

Re: The Worst Toys of 2007 – Part 2

11/18/2007 8:35 AM

Old Folks forgetting how to have fun. Seems when ya old and a drop to the ground could mean death, ya want all others around to aid ya through life, and seeing kids play as ya once did, now only pisses ya off.

__________________
Out Of The Inner Circle
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 1
#4
In reply to #3

Re: The Worst Toys of 2007 – Part 2

11/18/2007 6:56 PM

Hap, I be older than them thar hills. I remember, as a boy, when my father and I would buy a BIG box of fireworks for $ 5. I had a ball for a month or more. I don't recall a great number of kids getting seriously injured or even killed with fireworks, but they still let minors drive cars with the results that thousands of minors get killed every year. I don't hear any hue and cry to stop teens from driving potentially fatal automobiles! But they restrict fireworks like they were nerve gas vilas. Don't blame the old timers. Blame the "do-gooders" who want to "protect" the kids, but they don't care if thousands more teen agers are killed in or by automobiles!

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 867
Good Answers: 11
#5
In reply to #4

Re: The Worst Toys of 2007 – Part 2

11/19/2007 8:18 AM

I have to agree that the nanny state will stifle all fun and innovation in the name of "safety." As to teens and cars you might want to check with the (great great?) grandchildren, since the restrictions on teen licenses are becoming more rigerous every time there is an accident.

The real irony to all this is that by age 18 you are able to join the military and be taught to kill, but you can't drink until you're 21 'cause you're not responsible enough...

I think "WATCH's" diatribe on the pogo stick ball toy is nonsense. Or maybe they are against pogo sticks as well? Heaven help us if a scraped knee caused unimaginable social and emotional trauma!

I think these sheep types have to bleat loudly enough so that the government funding and / or donations from concerned citizens keep coming in....

__________________
Eric
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

ca1ic0cat (1); Cardio-2 (1); DrMoose (1); Hap (1); vikas (1)

Previous in Blog: The Worst Toys of 2007 – Part 1   Next in Blog: The Worst Toys of 2007 - Part 3

Advertisement