Wire and Cable Technology Blog Blog

Wire and Cable Technology Blog

The Wire and Cable Technology Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about power cables; cable assemblies; cable manufacturing & testing; and cable ducts, trays and accessories. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Power Lines Go Where the Winds Blow   Next in Blog: Can Superconducting Cables Deliver?
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Are You Converting to FTTD?

Posted February 16, 2008 7:51 AM

As far as fiber-to-the desk (FTTD) is concerned, it seems to be a matter of when, not if. One by one, the reasons for clinging to copper seem to be dropping away. For example, it has been argued that fiber optic cables are more fragile than copper cables. While that may have been true in the past, fiber optic cables are now easily as rugged as copper cable. Another argument is that fiber optics cost more. But recent studies show that by reducing the amount of real estate needed for wiring closets, FTTD system are actually cheaper than copper-based networks. What do you think? Is your organization ready for fiber-to-the-desk?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Wire & Cable Technology, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Wire & Cable Technology today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
2
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 4
Good Answers: 1
#1

Re: Are You Converting to FTTD?

02/16/2008 12:56 PM

After my registering for this site I was greeted with a message that contained the following quotation by Samuel Jackson:

"Nothing will ever be attempted if all possible objections must first be overcome."

I thought to myself, How apropos of the subject at hand.

Needless to say, I agree with the premise of the original blog message concerning the inevitability of fiber's entry at the desktop level, particularly for large installations where the size of floor plates and building heights warrant it, and where wireless alternatives do not suffice.

However, the legacy reasoning behind transitioning from copper to fiber, some of which were stated or implied by the author, alone, have not, and probably will not be sufficient anytime soon to overcome the embedded mindset surrounding the practices of the building construction trades and MEPs, including enterprise IT & Department Design and Construction Departments whose collective predilections have, to this date, at least, preserved the hegemony of copper.

It's not merely about the first cost economics alone at this point, as anyone with a four-function calculator can now figure out on their own. It goes far deeper than that. And it's not even about the type of wire, itself. With no malice intended towards anyone who may be reading this, it is high time that we recognized, or became educated to the fact, that:

It's not the wire. It's the architecture, Stupid!

I believe that several new and inter-dependent drivers have arrived on the scene that may soon begin to change all of this. The main thrust behind this new argument has to do with reducing or eliminating carbon footprints (and all the trading of carbon credits tha go along with it) and the costs associated with electric power, since fiber, due to its ability to eliminate distance concerns, easily facilitates the backhaul and physical relocation of processes and power-consuming systems hardware that would otherwise continue to be situated locally in order to meet the obligatory 90+10 meter constraint.

As I type this I'm reminded of the new IT direction that points increasingly towards cloud computing, SaaS, remote server farms, and, in short, virtualizing just about everything possible, which further advances the argument for back-hauling applications and systems hardware over fiber. If one accepts the latter as a macroeconomic argument, then FTTD and FTTE (enclosure) becomes its lesser, or microeconomic, equivalent.

Ironically, while using a fiber-based, hence, distance-neutral, approach may contribute significantly to ameliorating environmental concerns by reducing carbon footprints, they are also responsible for the same level, perhaps even more so now due to advancements in photonics, of cost savings that they always have in the past (adjusted for inflation and energy price indexing, of course) when these types of architecture are used. Under such a cross-disciplinary regime, some of the same network topologies that were proposed and summarily rejected twenty years ago are now being viewed far more favorably and beginning to see acceptance.

The economies implied above hold especially true for LAN hardware and administration, real estate and, very significantly, the costs associated with electric power and associated environmental provisions required to sustain equipment enclosures, which, today, must still be within 90 meters of desktops in situations where copper is still used.

Think about it. How many technology equipment rooms, i.e., LAN rooms and "telco closets", in a sixty-story building with a 30k sq ft floor area (anywhere from two to six per floor) could be turned into small meeting areas, lounge spaces or kiosk areas, or in newer structures yet to be built, made part of the building's open floor areas?

frank@coluccio.net

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Are You Converting to FTTD?

02/18/2008 10:32 AM

THANK YOU, FRANK,

There is a voice in the wilderness; since dating back

to the days of "Figure Eights" while remembering we don't

NEED "Battery power " to make this travel beyond the next

switch office, I often wonder about the mindsets, at work,

still today. However, convince a prop. mgr. of the rents

avail. while upgrading a 1970-80s bldg. to FTTD or even FTTE

& you have a convert. Well said.

JIM

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Are You Converting to FTTD?

02/15/2009 11:08 PM

Hi Frank,

Very interesting. Would you have any real-life examples of FTTD being used for trading floors please? I am thinking large trading floors with hundreds of positions (since i have a practical case on my hands...).

Any inputs much appreciated,

Fabio fabfx@bloomberg.net

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Are You Converting to FTTD?

02/15/2009 11:25 PM

Hello Fabio. Good to hear from you.

We've designed and managed the implementation of many trading floor installations that have used FTTD, starting as early as the mid 1980s. During those earlier days fiber was used not only for LAN-type protocols (actually, very little was used for supporting IEEE-type LANs back then), but as substitutes for myriad other media, including many of the market data services of the era and RGB/S coaxial bundles for desktop video displays connecting to video switches in closets on other floors. In other cases we did support Ethernet employing passive optica networks (PONs) that used optical power splitters in support of an OTC desk.

I noticed your email address's domain name. My firm was the first to convert to fiber the thick black coaxial cable that was used by Bloomberg Terminals when we moved Solomon Bros. (I guess I can use their name now ;) into 7 WTC (RIP) back in 1990-91. At the present time we've been busy with several novel approaches to FTTD that we believe will gain a great deal of favor in the financial services space, including, if not especially, trading rooms.

What specifically are you contemplating doing? I'm happy to offer opinions here or via email. Thanks for the reply.

Frank Coluccio, Principal - Cirrant Partners Inc. / New York City

frank@fttx.org

------

Reply
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Are You Converting to FTTD?

02/16/2009 1:20 AM

Frank - thanks for the answer. I am advising a big bank, COO-type level/role, not on the technical side (am a trader essentially, hence the Bloomberg address) although i do have a strong technical background, therefore don't mind poking my nose in that space when "necessary". They have a state-of-the-art data center, and are now about to design & build a new trading floor for a couple hundred trader positions, to replace the old one from a decade+ ago. Virtualization solution not firmed up yet.

I was wondering whether FTTD cldn't be an additional game-changing solution in terms of allowing more flexibility for floor design and further position MACs (move, add, change) that wld be much more frequent on trading floors if they weren't such a costly headache as current? As well as being a lower-cost, lower-latency, space-saving, greener etc type solution. Key drivers overall are improved resilience, latency, cost.

Any thoughts and more recent experiences / examples much appreciated, here or direct to my bloomie address.

Thanks & best,

Fabio fabfx@bloomberg.net

Reply
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 4
Good Answers: 1
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Are You Converting to FTTD?

02/16/2009 2:25 AM

Hi Fabio.

Thanks for clarifying your situation and the perspective you maintain on this subject. Yes, FTTD, depending on how it is deployed could easily be seen as game-changing. That's actually an appropriate way for describing it.

Using fiber strategically throughout the trading room and many other parts of the enterprise where it's not currently being us could also be paradigm shifting in much more profound ways too, with respect to how latency is dealt with for algorithmic/program trading, say, or in terms of infrastructure design where it could save tons of cash on electric powering, real estate and a/c costs as well.

But the foregoing areas are merely where the first signs of apparent benefits show up. As you peel the layers of the onion back a plethora of other benefits begin to shine through in some surprsing ways as well. I should like to take this up with you again here tomorrow, or later in the week, or perhaps via email at some point. It's rather late at this point. For now, it's been nice chatting with you.

BR, Frank

------

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long.92E,Lat.26N
Posts: 1336
Good Answers: 14
#3

Re: Are You Converting to FTTD?

02/18/2008 12:33 PM

I shall vote for Fibre to be Universalized for all signal transmissions above 1Mhz

Let Aluminium do the 50>60Hz power above 100V and above 1Amp.

Let all flexibles remain Copper.

Let DC Volts and below 5Amp current remain Copper.

Let Copper not be depleted any longer.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); fabio (2); FAC (2); JIM MAHANNA (1); MUKULMAHANT (1)

Previous in Blog: Power Lines Go Where the Winds Blow   Next in Blog: Can Superconducting Cables Deliver?
You might be interested in: Fiber Optic Cables, Patch Cables and Cords, Flat Cables

Advertisement