Semiconductor & MEMS Fabrication Blog

Semiconductor & MEMS Fabrication

The Semiconductor Fabrication Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about manufacturing processing equipment, semiconductor test and measurement, products & services, and semiconductor materials. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Moore's Law Needs New Material   Next in Blog: What Color Is It?
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Who Will Fund Development?

Posted March 02, 2008 7:50 AM

Recent articles point to the enormous and ever-spiraling burden of keeping Moore's Law running into future generations. The cost of building a fabrication facility — already $3 to $5 billion and discouraging all but the most dedicated manufacturers — is expected to triple. How can you afford to keep pace? Must you limit your product line to less-expensive prior-generation feature sizes? Will you need to partner with other manufacturers that now are direct competitors? How can you cope with the continuing rapid pace of technological change?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Semiconductor Fabrication, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Semiconductor Fabrication today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: El Lago, Texas, USA
Posts: 2639
Good Answers: 65
#1

Re: Who Will Fund Development?

03/03/2008 12:08 PM

Why is it even necessary?

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 440
Good Answers: 2
#2

Re: Who Will Fund Development?

03/07/2008 3:13 PM

The economic reality is that no-one will build a new "fab" unless there are customers. If people want tiny gadgets badly enough, they'll pay outrageous prices for them, and that's what funds the new fabs. (Think iPhone.)

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#3

Re: Who Will Fund Development?

03/08/2008 3:16 AM

Hi,

everybody expects a limit to this growth but nobody can predict this.

As the diameter of the wafers reached 100mm or 4" there was a rumor that the flexibility will increase too much with the next step to 150mm - as the thickness is held constant the compliance is rising with the third power of the diameter.

This problem caused later the chnage from horizontal wafer orientation during transport and processing to vertical.

Then there was the rumor about the slicing of the raw silicon ingots (coming from vacuum crystallisation) a very expensive material (from 500 to 15,000$/kg depending on purity) that this slicing could no longer be done with the inner diameter diamond saw because the total machine being no longer possible with adequate cost and risc.

The answer was the wire-saw where a twisted steel wire (100 in parallel) is used in a lapping process with siliconcarbide to cut the silicon.

The next step was the one-side-grinder switched to simultaneous two-side-grinding.

In parallel the step and repeat cameras were growing in size and in quality to expand the limits of classical optics, now using deep UV-light to expose and next going to vacuum UV still imagable with calciumfluoride lenses, next going to all reflecting optics as x-rays will be used for exposure.

This is stream of miracles made reality by engineers!!!

But: for shure there will be a limit. May be we reach this limit with the todays or tomorrows next generation of equipment.

Do you have suggestions which part of the pocess chain will be the limiting link?

RHABE

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Illinois, USA
Posts: 440
Good Answers: 2
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Who Will Fund Development?

03/08/2008 2:28 PM

I'm betting that the limit will be the wires. As wires get skinnier, resistance and capacitance don't scale along. Transistors get faster as they get smaller, but the wire effects overwhelm that, so things actually get slower. (Details available on request.)

However, we can get around this by building in layers. 3D-ICs can make chips faster and smaller without shrinking the wires. (Again, I have details if you want 'em.)

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 4 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

AstroNut (2); bhankiii (1); RHABE (1)

Previous in Blog: Moore's Law Needs New Material   Next in Blog: What Color Is It?

Advertisement