Engineering News Blog

Engineering News

Latest news of interest to engineers. Sourced from GlobalSpec's Engineering News

Previous in Blog: Cheaper gas is just a few clicks away   Next in Blog: Google invests $20 million into renewable energy
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

The Case for Lunar Property Rights

Posted May 22, 2008 9:16 AM

From Slashdot:

Who owns the moon? In a thought provoking piece, Instapundit blogger/law professor Glenn Reynolds gives us a brief history of earthlings' discourse on lunar property rights, a topic which has stagnated since the 1979 Moon Treaty. Is it possible to claim good title on land that is not under the dominion of a nation? He goes on to plead his case for the creation of lunar real estate legislation. From the article: 'Property rights attract private capital and, with government space programs stagnating, a lunar land rush may be just what we need to get things going again.

Read the whole article

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: The Case for Lunar Property Rights

05/23/2008 12:09 AM

History has proven that humans need only 2 reasons to go anywhere, let alone to go to the moon. One there's got to be something there that we want and two there's got to be someone there who already has it.

So while there may be plenty of the former, there's none of the latter, henceforth, there's no reason to go there because there is no one to overrun, slaughter, pillage, rape, take into slavery or play a game of scrabble with.

If there were a bunch of little green scrabble-playing men up there, we'd have colonized the whole damn thing 3 times over by now. And that's only because if there is one thing humans can't stand more than someone else having something they want, its because they hate being beaten at anything, especially scrabble.

(If anyone happens to get this far, please consult your Hitchhiker's Guide and it will all make perfect sense)

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#7
In reply to #1

Re: The Case for Lunar Property Rights

05/26/2008 11:11 AM

Hey guest...you just gotta sign up here.

You missed the other 2 possibilites...
The Green critters could be edible or shaggable

Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: East of Seattle, Washington state Republic of the 50 states of America
Posts: 2045
Good Answers: 36
#2

Re: The Case for Lunar Property Rights

05/23/2008 1:00 AM

Darn it I keep coming up with 42?

Possession and keeping possession is ownership. The 1979 Treaty was a political maneuver.

The Moon is all the things Man wants to possess. Materials, Real estate, Energy- all resources, and a small gravity well for further space exploration.

The political problem is it takes a Saturn V to put on the moon what a V2 can return.

My opinion is "He who rules the moon will rule/Govern the Earth". That is if we live that long at our current tech level or higher.

Brad

__________________
(Larrabee's Law) Half of everything you hear in a classroom is crap. Education is figuring out which half is which.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Member United States - Member - Army Vet in the aviation industry

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bridgewater, Va.
Posts: 2175
Good Answers: 119
#3

Re: The Case for Lunar Property Rights

05/23/2008 11:07 AM

As Robert Heinlein described in "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress", anyone with some lunar real estate and a couple of decently sized mass drivers can pretty much call the shots for the entire Earth population.

I wouldn't want anyone claiming lunar real estate but me!!

Trivia note - "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" is also where "TANSTAAFL" originated.

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Wannabeabettawelda

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 7940
Good Answers: 458
#4

Re: The Case for Lunar Property Rights

05/23/2008 12:27 PM

Is there any waterfront property still available?

Reply
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Interested in everything- see my Profile please APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member Hobbies - Musician - Autoharp and Harmonica Hobbies - Hunting - Member Hobbies - Fishing - Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Christchurch, (The Garden City), South Island, New Zealand
Posts: 4395
Good Answers: 230
#6
In reply to #4

Re: The Case for Lunar Property Rights

05/24/2008 10:51 PM

Hello Brave Sir Robin

There are plenty of "mares' up there.

Mare is Latin for Sea.

I am given to understand that beachfront property sales have taken off.

Kind Regards....

__________________
"The number of inventions increases faster than the need for them at the time" - SparkY
Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ohio. USA
Posts: 578
Good Answers: 30
#5

Re: The Case for Lunar Property Rights

05/23/2008 3:04 PM

I'm sure many in the legal profession would love the whole world to get in a big legal battle over this.

__________________
Everything I know about opera I learned from Bugs Bunny
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Brave Sir Robin (1); DaveB (1); Hooker (1); Sparkstation (1); U V (1); user-deleted-1105 (1)

Previous in Blog: Cheaper gas is just a few clicks away   Next in Blog: Google invests $20 million into renewable energy

Advertisement