Semiconductor & MEMS Fabrication Blog

Semiconductor & MEMS Fabrication

The Semiconductor Fabrication Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about manufacturing processing equipment, semiconductor test and measurement, products & services, and semiconductor materials. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: The End of Beginnings   Next in Blog: Are MEMS Slow to Commercialize?
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Should We Shrink Because We Can?

Posted November 06, 2008 8:14 AM

The universality of Moore's Law has always included an echo of "why?" Does the capability of today's devices actually limit your product's performance? The discovery of a new potential state of matter that will extend the advances predicted by the law raises that question once again. What will we do with the extra capacity? Who will specify the applications that will take advantage of all that power? How will we ensure that new super-dense devices work reliably? Exploiting them will require mountains of new software. Who will write that software? How will we ensure that end products work as intended?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Semiconductor Fabrication, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Semiconductor Fabrication today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#1

Re: Should We Shrink Because We Can?

11/07/2008 3:07 AM

No

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: El Lago, Texas, USA
Posts: 2639
Good Answers: 65
#2

Re: Should We Shrink Because We Can?

11/07/2008 9:42 AM

During my 30 something years in engineering, I've noticed a disturbing trend - parts get smaller and my eyesight gets worse. I do most of my "hands on" work under a magnifying glass these days.

But to address the question - as long as there's a market for it, shrink, baby, shrink!

I especially enjoy the higher density in FPGAs. Being able to put everything in one chip makes design, simulation, fabrication, testing (if you're smart) easier. And more density implies better power efficiency, and that's always a good thing.

Just put it in a package that I can see.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3

Re: Should We Shrink Because We Can?

11/07/2008 5:19 PM

what do you mean by " the discovery of a new potential state of matter" ,have l fallen a sleep again?these thing are a product of this jerney ,we are not at end of our goal.Anything to get us there quickly ,safely and in one piece is wirth it .

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Milky Way galaxy, Sol solar system, Earth (not Giaha), USA, WA, N.E.
Posts: 691
Good Answers: 13
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Should We Shrink Because We Can?

11/08/2008 4:43 PM

Dear Guest,

Please proof read and use spell check. Your post is nearly incomprehensible.

__________________
They that do not learn from history and apply those lessons to the present are bound to repeat its failures.
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Aloha or
Posts: 659
Good Answers: 19
#5

Re: Should We Shrink Because We Can?

11/10/2008 4:00 PM

The why is simple- if you don't your competition will, grabbing your market share and soon you will be out of business.

New potential state of matter?
How about a reference to this. I am aware of solid , liquid, gas and plasma, what else you got?

Who will specify the applications?
Again simple- the customer always determines what apps sell and what don't. If it does not benefit the customer it will soon be gone from the market place.

__________________
Closed biased minds are utterly impervious to any factual evidence which contradicts their beliefs
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Should We Shrink Because We Can?

11/15/2008 10:07 PM

You also forgot about super flulids ie helium at about 1 kelvin can actually pass through most containers... hahaha also thinks there is another state at extreme cold temps called the bode-eistien effect (not sure on spelling)

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#6

Re: Should We Shrink Because We Can?

11/10/2008 5:20 PM

Pehaps I should expand my monosylabic answer.
No...unless there is a good reason.
Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#8

Re: Measuring magnification

12/06/2008 4:38 AM

Most opticians will have an optical instrument for measuring the power of lenses, in dioptres.

Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 8 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); bhankiii (1); Shadetree (1); silvCrow (1); user-deleted-1105 (3)

Previous in Blog: The End of Beginnings   Next in Blog: Are MEMS Slow to Commercialize?

Advertisement