No Hiatus in Global Warming After All

As some famous shyster once said,

" Of course we had to exaggerate and lie. No one would have cared if had told the truth."

If I have to live until I am 100,000 years old to see the outcome of this discussion, we will be barely typing, and it will be a medical miracle, because not even Methuselah lived that long.

I just looked in my telescope, an asteroid the size of Cleveland is headed directly for your front door, I'd open a beer if I were you.

Hey looky, it is Friday all of a sudden, and I am free to go home, until tomorrow.

fear not, all your Pals will be here just waiting

I'm already at home hoisting a tall cold one.

I haven't smoked for years, so I'm tension free.

Got a half dozen "Mad Elf" left from Christmas - it's Friday post 5PM - might just do that.

Ever try that one? Nasty stuff to down quickly if you've not eaten or had any liquids for 12 hours. Made that mistake just once.

Because I have the time and, unlike you, I do tend to add new more relevant information and plausible points of contention that counters your views as I find them whenever the subject comes up just as the NASA animation shows that the CO2 value we are being lead to believe is a world wide planetary scale never varying always climbing value when in fact it's a highly variable and dynamic range of value regarding both time and location throughout a year.

It's an 'undeniable fact' some of us have loads of reasons and resources to back up why we have doubts about what it is people like you claim to be real and a threat when we see it as being grossly over exaggerated, highly circumstantial evidence or outright proven lies being used more for political and financial manipulation than true good stewardship of the planet.

Simply put, if you claim something without verifiable sole causality to back it up it's going to be questioned and if found to be of a poor factual basis it will get called out every time and if I have the desire to do so it's going to be get wordy!

Step up and provide valid credible data to support your views or keep them to yourself. You call it opinion or even denial , but some of us call it good scientific review process so if you don't want to get reviewed and called out for being wrong on your reasoning maybe it's time to stop posting your opinions that keep getting torn apart.

You damn well I and others are going to call you and anyone else out on anything susceptible of being exaggeration, circumstantial evidence or outright BS on your belief systems with as many words as needed so what's so difficult to follow?

If you don't like these threads and you don't like me going after you every time for your same old nonsense narrow minded one value and one instance means everything BS maybe it would be a wise idea to just not post.

I tried to stay out of this one but guess who had to post questionable BS that didn't show the real primary facts behind the issues and made me have to come in here and clarify what's really behind that circumstantial localized crap that was being purported to be some indication of a planetary scale problem when in facts it's a well known and well understood issue that largely stems from a combination of geographical conditions and local weather plus gross overpopulation as its primary source again.

"WE ARE NOT 100% RESPONSIBLE"

NOBODY EVER SAID THAT WE WERE 100% RESPONSIBLE.

Get over it!

Millions in China Learn to Live With Smog 'Airpocalypse'

Airpocalypse In Beijing and Even US Cities: The Dangers of Smog And Precautions You Should Take

The Atlantic Ocean and an Actual Debate in Climate Science

Climate change may shut down a current that keeps the North Atlantic warm

If you keep doing what you always did, you'll keep getting what you always got.

It's only going to get worse now that a complete idiot is about to become dictator of the USA.

Can you take that crap to the break room, we are trying to have a serious discussion here.