Frequency Of Visible Light?

Radio is very interesting. At a wavelength of around 1 to .01 nm, a transition takes place. This area is called hard x-ray. Wavelengths smaller and frequencies higher are monopole emissions and wavelength above and frequencies below this point are dipole, tripole, quadpole or collective field emissions.

Monopole wavelengths go much smaller with much higher frequencies.

The monopole emissions come from rotation. The other emissions come from oscillations.

Frequency of oscillations can be varied by acceleration, gravity and other external influence and stimuli, like a torque.

We use oscillation to measure external influence with a 3 or 6 axis oscillation. This is how your smart phone knows it has been rotated 90 degrees. Unfortunately, we also use oscillation for our clocks. This gives error and a false apparent change in the rate of time. In which many conclude is evidence of spacetime.

It would be interesting to compare monopole emissions to the light emissions of these highly red shifted stars. The monopole emissions should not shift. Our clocks vary with height, just as a pendulum does.

But a vertical rotating shaft has the same time at both ends. We need a rotational time ticker to measure time accurately.

There are four accelerations and two stops in an oscillation. There are two constant accelerations in a rotation.

Could we measure time more accurately using light from distant stars? The twisty-clock...

How 'bout this then...?

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917421002270

But the time will vary with the diameter,but referenced to a stationary point of observation,this will cancel out when observing the center of rotation.

Or not?

We can measure E and M wave fields on conductors and in circuits. They are easy to detect and display and easily seen as a wave function. A continuous changing and alternating wave, no doubt about it. We can also here them and with a proper transducer, we can even feel the waves. And we put a sine wave into a dipole and we receive a sine wave at the receiving dipole. It's only reasonable and logical that the propagation from one dipole to another.......is a sine wave function. Like between to circuit coils in circuits. That is a wave function. We assume the same for propagation.

But I don't think it is. I think the antenna fires, like an ignition coil. Only instead of collapsing back into the coil, the collapse is out into space. I believe a 1/2 period chunk of electrical disturbance is emitted every 1/2 period from the antenna. Giving the receiving antenna a 1/2 period duration of stimulus, this charges the RX antenna, and during the 1/2 period when the antenna is not being stimulated, the charged antenna discharges. The so called received "frequency" comes from detector, or antenna reactance. Our antennas and detectors, bounce electrically.

It does NOT take 1/2 period to emit that chunk. That chunk is emitted in a snap. It's an instant collapse or fire, but the emitted disturbance has a duration as it passes by.

This happens every 180 degrees of input to TX antenna.

The free change on the receiving antenna or a detector, is like a tank circuit......it rings when stimulated. And the whole dynamic is like a class B amp. The propagation is like the 1/2 period amp current, and the detection is the ringing, giving 360 degrees in the tank circuit.

The dipole has two modes of operation. On transmit, the dipole is sequentially end fed. The stimulus flows down the element and timing is important.

But in receiving mode, the antenna is charged broadside, NOT sequentially end fed, ALL of the antenna is being stimulated at the same time. Broadside fed.

These are two completely different types of current. And two completely different dynamics.

I believe that one photon can be emitted from a dipole. By feeding a precision 180 degree one shot into the TX antenna. And get one full 360 from the RX antenna.

A wave has a one full period of emission time. Like the time it takes for a speaker to move. And a wave has one full period of propagation passage. AND it takes one full period for detection. For a wave.

But a light strobe or EM emission strobe has an instant emission time, a 1/2 period passage propagation time.........and a full period detection time.

This instant emission character gives us a constant velocity, no matter what the emitter velocity is. The emitted wave is always at c speed before emission, no acceleration needed. The "emission" is actually and instant directional change, from angular to linear. The EM field has no inertia.....allowing that instant change.

The intermittent duty cycle of emission, explains all of our measurements with omnipresent time and length(space). As a matter of fact, the change in phase and frequency of a received emission, demonstrates and proves absolute time and length.

We just don't realize this yet.

We shouldn't put our hubris on all living things. Only humans need a destiny.

Why do you place yourself above other living things?