Anti gravity Emitters

You can reflect an electromagnetic wave... light, radio, etc....
But how do you reflect a 'field' ...magnetic, gravitational?

Or are you waiting for the detection of gravitons?
If there were enough of them to reflect, presumably there would be enough of 'em to detect?

Electrons are blue and shiny (right?) so what colour are gravitons? ...

Del

"Where Do the Anti-Gravity Emitters Get put, to Stableize the ship?"

One on each corner.

Hello JohnDG

Unfortunately the type of Ship the Topic Starter was referring to is entirely spherical.

Therefore, and sadly, your suggestion isn't going to help.

Kind Regards....

Sorry - I'd assumed it was a 3-sphere. I'll read the question more closely next time.

One on each corner? What planet do you come from? Everybody knows that when you put one on each corner you get a total negative reality inversion! You need to put one big one in the center and triangulate three sub-partical over-unity ion beam generators around it to control the dark matter produced in the reactance field! Come on JohnDG, I thought you were up on this stuff!

BUT HE SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THERE ARE 3!!!

If you put them all at the center, they'd be occupying the same space - and that's impossible.

According to Henway's Law, an anti(anything) emitter can be treated as though it were the reciprocal of a physical object.

Thus, ΔG = (r)d/Ψ

Clearly, this allows all three to occupy what appears to be the same space.

An alternative approach, much more elegant, is transposition of the Cartesian coordinates of a sphere into log-log Dali coordinates of a cube.

I was thinking more along the lines of distributing the three devices across the 3^i vertices of the 3-sphere using the inverse probability density function (the improbability density function) to balance the system. Concentrating the drive/reflectors at the centre would, IMHO, lead to instability.

This thread seems to have had the unusual side-effect of suppressing the text formatting functions on the reply editor. Is this universal, or specific to my installation?

Excellent observation John! It seems to be affecting the response inundater in the same way it would if it was cross harmonised with the freak flux coordinate cancelling systems! Only one course of action I can think of, and we all know what that is!!

I believe if you set them spinning, one slower than the speed of light , one at the speed of light ,and one faster than the speed of light, that they could be in the same space. but not at the same time because this would disrupt the time continuim and you could end up as dinasaur bait.

TVP45 - please excuse my impolite dismissal of your astute observation concerning Henway's Law, and your insightful proposal. One must never lose objectivity!

I was momentarily transported by the intensity of the discussion. I humbly apologize, and crave your indulgence.

However, I stand by my previous post.

Not at all. Since I could not get the superscript function to work, I was forced into using the time-dependent expression rather than the more universal body-centered-cubic tensor, and that may have misled me.

Whats the opposite of dark matter?white matter?Cumputer controlled gravitron field.Strong enough magnetic field/alluminium will buunce a laser off of it's surface,If it is spinning,same theory.I need more feed back.Get back with you tomorrow/keith_moc,Thank YOU ALL for your feedback..!!..Back to the LAB..

Good point about the batteries.

If he used lithium-iron (LiFe) cells, he could use the spare irons for an iron propulsion system, then he'd maybe be left with some extra stuff to make the DiLithium Crystals for warping.

Were working with High voltage electricity.I Have a strong magnetic field theory.Im trying to work on.Thanks Anyway.Keith.More Power More electron field?The Higher my fake ship flies..Keith_moc

I keep mine in the glove box.

I will warn however against placing the battery engines too close in proximity to the flux capacitor. If using an Ytterbium anti-gravitational core, the gyroscopic action of the anti-daft relays will be compromised causing a more linear function to occur as illustrated in this graph. .

May the Schwartz be with you.

I did have a prototype KrisDel^TM anti gravity emitter. However Mrs Cat put it 'outside' when she was tidying up, she said it was cluttering up the ceiling . It's not been seen since.

Now that I've made a proper ass of myself with wisenheimer cracks, I'll seriously answer the OP. There is no such thing as anti-gravity emitters. There is no such thing as anti-gravity. There are no gravity shields.

Ohhhhhhhh Nooooooooooooooo

Now you tell me!!! I'm following your every word religiously (Ooops don't say that word!), I've been searching the internet and found websites that support your theories!

I've spent all today designing a prototype anti-gravity decorative fruit bowl....

And now you tell me its all just a laugh??!!!

*sob* - John

But there is anti gravity! remember the floating frog of the University of Florida?

I once had an Auntie Graveeti, but she left after Mum & Dad caught her snogging with the rabbit.

My older, worldly cousin had antigravitee. I think a dose of penicillin fixed 'em right up though.

cr3

Ahh, based on this and the previous thread I think keith may be a troll. I am ignoring the poor English and grammar and looking purely at the content and lack of direction of this and the previous thread.

I would put this as off topic but in this case I don't think it counts.

I agree it's all very sus, but what would a troll manage to do here, except make an arse of themselves?

So Keith, where would you suggest is the best place to put the Anti gravity emitters? There have been a few swerve ball posts but we are all quite interested in the subject of where to put them!

Hello Mr. Truman Brain

I have a suggestion about where to put those Anti gravity emitters.

But I cannot place that suggestion here both because this may be read by young persons and/or the fairer sex, and also would be against the CR4 Forum Rules.

Kind Regards....