Previous in Forum: ABB Regulation unit for Sulzer 16ZAV40S   Next in Forum: Unearthed and Earthed grade
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Canada - Member -

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In the sticks of the Central Kootenays, BC, Canada
Posts: 266
Good Answers: 20

Question About Radio Waves and Interaction With Water

10/17/2008 12:34 AM

Here's a question to all you RF engineers out there in CR4-land!

I'm installing some low powered (<1 watt) radio repeaters for some community wireless broadband internet in my area. The frequencies will be the non-licensed 900 mhz,2.4 and 5.8 ghz bands.

I was told by someone who seems quite knowlegeable that groundwater will adversely affect the performance of the radio transmitters and that I really should avoid anywhere that has groundwater. The way to tell if there was groundwater in the area of our proposed towers was to dowse, or water witch. A relocation could be as simple as moving 20 feet to avoid the water. About this time alarm bells were going off in my head.

His experience was with setting up wireless microphones for audio performances, and two spots were very bad for him: one was over water, on a wharf, and another in a building built in a very wet environment with lots of groundwater.

On the other hand, radio systems seem to work very well on ships--they are surrounded by water.

Is there any science to this concern? If there is, what is the scientific way of reducing the negative impact to my radio signals? After all, when I'm playing with less than a watt, I would like to keep whatever I can for a signal!

Thanks,

Jon.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
6
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Interested in everything- see my Profile please APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member Hobbies - Musician - Autoharp and Harmonica Hobbies - Hunting - Member Hobbies - Fishing - Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Christchurch, (The Garden City), South Island, New Zealand
Posts: 4395
Good Answers: 230
#1

Re: Question about radio waves and interaction with water

10/17/2008 2:30 AM

Hello sawmilleng

The groundwater should not downgrade your transmission/reception at those frequencies, unless it rises high enough to cover the transceivers and/or the antennae = A Flood

It was found here some 40 years ago, that at certain frequencies, the rising sap during the Spring season did affect transmission/reception from/to radio repeaters which we had based on hilltop sites.

When I did a series of practical tests at that time, after it was realized that the radiated power at distances had dropped off so severely, the Monterey Pine (called Pinus Radiata in New Zealand) tree sap rise during the Springtime was found to cause major problems in the 90MHz through 450MHz frequency range.

Other trees were also found to cause losses at different frequency ranges.

Our solution was to raise the antenna masts some 20 metres, which gained some years breathing space, until the trees arrived at milling stage, normally in New Zealand around 30 - 40 years, and then it was ensured that replacement trees were not planted in the immediate line-of-sight from/to the repeater stations.

So, you should have no bother with your repeaters, but remember that reception is mostly line-of-sight at your frequencies too.

Ensure that you have good filters, so the repeater transmitter does not interfere with the repeater receiver - we used tunable silver-plated coaxial filters.

Field-Strength Tests - A Good Plan:

It is a good idea to have a field-strength test of your system, at various locations in the district, before handing the system over.

We used to do this by setting the transmitter of the repeater station, so that the transmitter remained transmitting for 5 seconds (a "tail") after the initial receiver lost the incoming signal from the mobile transmitter.

The transceiver in the testing vehicle (We used a Land-Rover because some terrain here was difficult) thus triggered the receiver of the repeater, which passed that signal through to the repeater transmitter (On a different frequency) and that repeater transmitter signal was then measured using a tuned field-strength meter in the mobile vehicle.

Signal positions were marked with a number on a Topographical map, and note made of the actual strength was made.

This was all done some 40+ years ago, before New Zealand got its first Computer, and later the field strengths were joined on the Master Map, same strengths were joined by lines, (similar to Weather Isobars), then that Master Map was copied off and a copy placed into each vehicle and installation.

So you have an explanation, along with some local (NZ) history.

Trust you have been assisted.

Kind Regards....

__________________
"The number of inventions increases faster than the need for them at the time" - SparkY
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 6)
Guru
Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Clemson, South Carolina
Posts: 1722
Good Answers: 18
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Question about radio waves and interaction with water

10/17/2008 10:22 AM

GA!

__________________
We have met the enemy and he is us . . . Walt Kelly
Register to Reply
Power-User
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Canada - Member -

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In the sticks of the Central Kootenays, BC, Canada
Posts: 266
Good Answers: 20
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Question about radio waves and interaction with water

10/17/2008 2:03 PM

Sparkstation,

Thanks for your thoughtful (and thorough) answer. But, as a Mech Eng that is kind of ignorant of EE stuff, I have some more dumb questions about radio propagation:

1. You implied that the propagation is unaffected by the conductivity of the ground--so that not much effects the radio signal as long as a clear line of sight is maintained between transmitter and receiver? The "ground plane" is kind of immaterial? (ignoring fresnel zones for the moment...)

1a. Presumably the earth connection of the radio should be as good as one can get--or does it matter much?

2. To paraphrase your comments about foliage attentuating the signal, the amount of attenuation depends a lot on the amount of water in the foliage? Presumably the attenuation happens because the radio signal is absorbed when it excites the water molecules or causes miniscule eddy currents in the water?

3. Our tree cover is mostly coniferous--pines, spruce, cedars, Douglas firs--the needles stay on year 'round but the sap definitely runs in the spring! Have you noticed any difference between conifers and deciduous foliage attenuation? We are striving to maintain line of sight--our repeater is high on a recently-logged area above the town, but some of the customer homes are buried in foliage...they may have to do a little pruning if they want to get on the 'web.

4. So, in summary, don't worry about the ground we are proposing to set our repeater on?

I can relate to the milling of the wood! That's my daytime job.

Thanks for your patience,

Jon.

Register to Reply
2
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Interested in everything- see my Profile please APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - Member Hobbies - Musician - Autoharp and Harmonica Hobbies - Hunting - Member Hobbies - Fishing - Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Christchurch, (The Garden City), South Island, New Zealand
Posts: 4395
Good Answers: 230
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Question about radio waves and interaction with water

10/18/2008 12:37 AM

Hello again sawmilleng

<"....1. You implied that the propagation is unaffected by the conductivity of the ground--so that not much effects the radio signal as long as a clear line of sight is maintained between transmitter and receiver? The "ground plane" is kind of immaterial? (ignoring fresnel zones for the moment...)....">

The conductivity of the ground does have an effect, but more in the lower frequency bands up to around 30MHz.

At the lower frequencies, the ground conductivity has a major effect on the "vertical angle of radiation", and getting that angle correct is still important to "Short Wave Broadcasters", so that their transmission uses the correct angle at full radiated power to optimise reception in the intended area of the world.

In extremely poor ground conductivity locations, it is often necessary to bury an Earth Mat, which may be heavy copper conductors, welded into 2 foot squares, and extending for 2 wavelengths of the transmitted frequency away from the antenna structure.

At the frequency ranges you intend using, the local ground conductivity should have a minimal effect, because your transmissions are line-of-sight, local UHF/SHF, not requiring multiple bounces between the ground and the Heaviside Layer to have proper signal strength at the receiving point.

Note: The Earth is an oblate spheroid, and the Heaviside Layer reflects back radio signals - This enables long distance Short Wave Radio reception which uses multiple bounces of the signal path between the Heaviside Layer and the ground or seawater eventually arriving at the intended destination.

Kind Regards....

__________________
"The number of inventions increases faster than the need for them at the time" - SparkY
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - bwire Hobbies - Car Customizing - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upper Mid-west USA
Posts: 7498
Good Answers: 97
#8
In reply to #5

Re: Question about radio waves and interaction with water

10/18/2008 10:35 AM

Hello Sparkstation;

You've certainly covered the field well, GA too.

__________________
If death came with a warning there would be a whole lot less of it.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#10
In reply to #5

Re: Question about radio waves and interaction with water

10/19/2008 10:36 AM

Yup, another ga Sparky.

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member Hobbies - Car Customizing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: FL Space Coast
Posts: 536
Good Answers: 14
#11
In reply to #5

Re: Question about radio waves and interaction with water

10/20/2008 6:39 AM

Tjanks fpr that link on the "Heaviside" layer. I always knew that the ionosphere was responseable for skip propagation at short wave frequencies, but I never understood why is was seasonal and why it dropped off during the day.

Thanks

GA

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User
Hobbies - HAM Radio - VE6LDS Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Canada - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 284
Good Answers: 10
#4

Re: Question About Radio Waves and Interaction With Water

10/17/2008 11:21 PM

I see that you are a fellow Canuck. You should be aware that there is a restriction on the effective radiated power for unlicensed services in the bands that you are talking about. While the transmitters may be less than 1 watt if you are using any form of a gain antenna you could be over the legal limit and liable for whatever penalties Industry Canada awards for such sins. It is not difficult to go over the limit with the antennas that are readily available today.

Please check with Industry Canada and calculate your ERP taking into effect the transmitter output and the gain characteristics of your antenna, it could save you some grief.

__________________
Semi-retired systems analyst, part time Ham radio operator, full time grandfather.
Register to Reply
Power-User
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Canada - Member -

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In the sticks of the Central Kootenays, BC, Canada
Posts: 266
Good Answers: 20
#9
In reply to #4

Re: Question About Radio Waves and Interaction With Water

10/19/2008 12:18 AM

CQ,

Thanks for your "heads up". Yes, we are aware of the restriction on ERP. No problem there.

When doing the math for a radio link, most of the benefit seems to come from bettering the receiving antenna gain, rather than punching out raw power from the transmitter. So there is not much incentive to push the legal limit on tranmitter/ERP power. Even though the radio cops are far away and are too busy to worry about an extra watt or two in our backwater valley... ;>)

Jon.

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - bwire Hobbies - Car Customizing - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upper Mid-west USA
Posts: 7498
Good Answers: 97
#6

Re: Question About Radio Waves and Interaction With Water

10/18/2008 1:55 AM

Hello sawmilleng;

Your buddies experience could've had factors you'll not encounter such as VHF or an inferior less than true diversity transmitter or any odd manner of goofy stuff about wireless audio equipment

I'm no expert but have used 900 MHz and 2.4 - 5.8 GHz on boats without problems. Just do not use when in water

__________________
If death came with a warning there would be a whole lot less of it.
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member United Kingdom - Big Ben - New Member Fans of Old Computers - Altair 8800 - New Member Canada - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3968
Good Answers: 120
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Question About Radio Waves and Interaction With Water

10/18/2008 10:06 AM

at 900 Mhz the wavelength is short enough that the ground (wet or dry) will be out of range for there to be interference as long as you are 10 feet or more above the ground.

Commercial antennas made for this service should have a package insert that advises you of the pattern of propagation.

If not drop into these sites.

http://www.sinctech.com/

http://www.rfsworld.com/

and lllok for data sheets on similar things and assorted white papers

__________________
Per Ardua Ad Astra
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 11 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

aurizon (1); Bill (1); Bricktop (1); bwire (2); IanR (1); sawmilleng (2); Sparkstation (2); The_curious_one (1)

Previous in Forum: ABB Regulation unit for Sulzer 16ZAV40S   Next in Forum: Unearthed and Earthed grade

Advertisement