Previous in Forum: Interfacing 80386 and 80387 Math Coprocessors   Next in Forum: Designing PCBs from Picaxe VSM
Close
Close
Close
17 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
Engineering Fields - Construction Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - Member - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Latitude 38.701979 Longitude -90.439540 Coordinates 38.701979, -90.439540 N38°42.11874, W090°26.3724
Posts: 668
Good Answers: 15

The Switch to Digital TV

01/15/2009 9:53 AM

I live in a valley. To get regular local TV I had to use an antenna mounted on a 40' high mast. This worked fine. I bought one of those Converter Boxes. It did not work with my masted antenna. Got only 1 station and it was poor reception. The guy at the TV service place I know recommended I unhook the masted antenna, buy a small rabbit ears antenna hook the rabbit ears to the converter and aim it at the masted antenna. It works. As long as the rabbit ears are pointed directly at the masted one I get perfect picture and all the stations. But if someone so much as bumps the rabbit ears out of line I lose the signals.

OK now the question. Why does this work?

Does the Masted antenna concentrate the signals so the little rabbit ears can pick them up? I asked the TV service guy why and he had no idea why.

__________________
scotchdrnkr
Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: Converter Box Digital TV
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
4
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: since 20 Jan 09, the USSA
Posts: 375
Good Answers: 81
#1

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/15/2009 10:48 AM

Sherlock Holmes said, "When you have eliminated every other possibility, what remains, no matter how improbable, is the answer." Or words to that effect. Keep this in mind as you read this post...

First, it is clear that the set-top converter has poor sensitivity compared to your TV set. And/or, it is poor match to the transmission line running from the mast head. BTW, is that 75 Ohm coax or 300 Ohm twinax, or...?

A simple solution to this problem is a preamplifier to give you back the lost sensitivity. This is best installed at the mast head, but for your application should work equally well atop the set-top converter. These are normally 75 Ohm input, so if you used 300 Ohm twinax coming down the mast, you will need one of those 300 Ohm to 75 Ohm transformers you can get at Radio Shack and elsewhere. The amplifiers themselves are well under US$50.

That should cure your problem. But getting back to the original problem, here's the strange part. From what you said, you are getting more loss via the transmission line than over the air via the rabbit ears. There is just about no way that should be happening with traditional rabbit ears. No way. But you mentioned "small" rabbit ears. Are you working in the traditional vhf spectrum (channels 2-13) or in the uhf band? If in the vhf, the rabbit ears need to be standard length to get decent sensitivity. Unless the rabbit ears have a built-in amplifier. If that is the case, they could be extremely sensitive. Do your "small" rabbit ears plug into mains power as well as the set-top converter?

Whether the rabbit ears are amplified or not, the mast head antenna does in a sense intensify the field around it. When the electromagnetic field from the TV broadcast station illuminates your antenna, it causes currents to flow on the antenna elements. Those currents in turn radiate a field that opposes the field that caused them. But in close to the antenna, you might pick up more radiated signal from this effect than without the masthead antenna being there. You may have noticed that if you are driving away from an FM station and beginning to lose reception quality, it comes back momentarily as you drive under a bridge or overpass. Same effect: the structure is locally concentrating the field via re-radiation.

One thing that isn't clear from your post is you say the rabbit ears must be "pointed at" the masthead antenna. Not sure what that means. Traditional rabbit ears are dipoles: their direction of maximum sensitivity is perpendicular to the elements themselves. If you literally mean that the small rabbit ear elements are pointed at the masthead antenna, that might make sense if they are amplified, and if the re-radiated field from your masthead is in that direction. Can explain why, but no point unless the rabbit ears are amplified. Also need to know what sort of masthead antenna you have, and its orientation relative to the rabbit ears.

Very interesting problem for an old rf guy. Hope to hear feedback from this post or see what others say.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Anonymous Poster
#2
In reply to #1

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/15/2009 3:01 PM

emc c:

There should be a category for outstanding answers. it was a delight to read your reply post.

best regards

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Construction Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - Member - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Latitude 38.701979 Longitude -90.439540 Coordinates 38.701979, -90.439540 N38°42.11874, W090°26.3724
Posts: 668
Good Answers: 15
#5
In reply to #1

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 6:11 AM

The Mast antenna is a 300 Ohm and I already have the 300 -75 Ohm converter on it.

Why would I suddenly need a preamp for the Mast antenna since I did not need one before I hooked up the DTV converter. Does the converter require that much of a stronger signal.

The Rabbit ears I used have both a VHF and a UHF antenna. I said Pointed But I guess I should have said turned just the right way.The small rabbit ears by the way did not pick up a signal when I tried to use them before so I put up the masted antenna. No power plug on the rabbit ears. Though I did try that type too before I put up the mast. I still have that one stored around the house someplace. I could dig it out and play with it too.

As far as the orientation of both antennas I'll have to look. I didn't really think about this until you brought it up. I know the Mast antenna is pointed to the North East. Because I remember that's the direction I needed it pointed to get the most stations. I could have bought a motor to rotate it to get all of them but I'm mostly interested in local news reports. Otherwise I don't watch TV. The kids hate the fact that I don't have cable or satellite but I can't see paying that much for them to sit on their butts turning into TV zombies.

Will any of this change when the official switch happens? I believe the stations I watch now have been switched over for years. Are they sending both types of signals until the official switch or just the New Improved" signal.

__________________
scotchdrnkr
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#10
In reply to #5

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 11:00 AM

"The Mast antenna is a 300 Ohm and I already have the 300 -75 Ohm converter on it."

This might be your problem right here. If the equipment doing this conversion has a comb filter that use to remove the unused inter-channel frequencies to reduce interference. Well this is where DTV signals reside. Some older antennas cleverly used a parasitically powered preamplifier with a comb filter to boost sensitivity and drive a 75 ohm cable.

As far as why the rabbit ears need to be oriented to the mast and not the station is because the mast is reflecting energy from the station down to your rabbit ears.

But this will be a permanent switch. The DTV frequencies being used now will be the DTV frequencies used in the future.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: since 20 Jan 09, the USSA
Posts: 375
Good Answers: 81
#11
In reply to #5

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 11:16 AM

First of all, thanks to those who gave GAs to my original post.

Here are some answers to scotch drinker's further questions, based on extra information from some of the other responders.

My original response was predicated on the assumption that the broadcast frequencies hadn't changed, just the signal coding (digital vs. analog). Other posters have since indicated the frequency of the transmission may have changed as well. If a channel you used to receive in the vhf band is now coming in uhf, then you will suffer signal loss relative to the original frequency. This assumes you using the same masthead antenna, and the broadcaster maintaining the same ERP (equivalent radiated power) at your location. Even if your masthead antenna has the same gain at vhf and uhf, you will get less signal at uhf. Signal reception is given by

Pr = Pd*G*(wavelength)^2/4 pi

where,

Pr is the power out of the antenna into your 300 Ohm twinax,

Pd is the power density illuminating your antenna,

G is antenna gain, and

wavelength (meters) is 300/frequency (MHz).

You can see that for the same gain, you get less signal at higher frequencies. Here is a place you can go to check the frequencies of the channels you are receiving:

http://www.csgnetwork.com/tvfreqtable.html.

If you find there has been a shift to uhf, that would explain the loss of signal, and again the preamp should help you get that back.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 24
Good Answers: 2
#3

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 3:41 AM

Perhaps I am wrong in my general understanding of DTV and converter boxes as I am an unstudied novice but doesn't the DTV system use UHF to transmit the signal? The poster may have issues with his multi pole Yagi antenna being tuned for VHF and shunting the UHF band and the rabbit ears may do a better job at passing the UHF band. He is simply getting a signal reflection from the mast to the rabbit ears.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
2
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 20
Good Answers: 1
#6
In reply to #3

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 9:58 AM

Not to say your answer on the antenna is wrong but a clarification of the VHF/UHF/DTV:

DTV is not removing all VHF from the allowed frequencies for TV transmission. There will still be VHF transmitters, and they will be transmitting DTV after Feb.

The UHF = DTV idea comes from the need for a second frequency to allow both NTSC (analog) and ATSC (digital) transmission. Most of the assigned frequencies for the DTV transmission as tv stations were adding the second transmitter to provide DTV while still having Analog TV were UHF, as there was more space available compared to VHF. People just assume because most of the new ATSC DTV stations were on UHF that is was because it was a requirement. When the old NTSC systems are shutdown, the tv station has the option to use either of the two frequencies they have been given.

I'm getting on shakey ground, but I think frequency assignments for after Feb 17 for full power television will be reduce to channels 2-36 and 38-51, so upper UHF will be the main area of frequencies then available for sale to cellphone companies.

In my area (NW Florida) a Mobile, Alabama station used channel 10 for analog and 9 for DTV. They are going to stay with channel 9. Dothan, Alabama used channel 4 for analog and 36(?) for DTV. They are going to shutdown ch 36 and use ch 4 for DTV when their analog transmission stop. Panama City, Florida has channel 7 on analog and 9 for DTV and I have not ideal which frequency they will use after the analog shutdown in Feb. So UHF = ATSC/DTV is not valid and I have first hand knowledge of VHF still being used.

Others may have first hand knowledge of this, but the Dothan station engineer told me that its a cost issue: you need less power for same effective area coverage at lower frequencies.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 361
Good Answers: 8
#12
In reply to #6

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 3:04 PM

I have tried both rabbit ears and the antenna I built. Rabbit ears (vhf) picks up analog signals much better than the antenna I built. It will not pick up any digital stations. The antenna I built does not pick up analog signals very well (at least not the ones I can receive at my location) but will pick up 2 digital stations (uhf) perfectly and occasionally 2 more when they are broadcasting (once I got 4 PBS stations but they have disappeared for now). I expect things to change after February 17th. I am hoping that I will be able to get more stations. Whether the antenna I built will pick them up if they are being broadcast on vhf frequencies is yet to be determined. All I know is, all I can get right now is uhf digital. It would be nice if I could get enough stations in HD to get rid of my satellite dish but I doubt I will be able to do that.

__________________
Always use protection.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 361
Good Answers: 8
#15
In reply to #12

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 3:38 PM

As a side note. Because the digital signal will reach the same coverage area with less power I believe that the stations will be reducing power. I think this might even be a requirement (correct me if I'm wrong). Therefore, if you live in a fringe area you will be receiving a weak signal still. This is not good. A weak signal with analog will allow you to still watch a program if you choose and you don't mind a little snow or occasional interferrence. A digital will either work stunningly, become very pixellated or not work at all ("no signal"). Usually it becomes pixellated then stops working for me. I have had instances where a plane flying overhead has caused my tv to go to the blue screen of death (so to speak) right in the middle of a program. This technology is great for city dwellers that are fairly close to the broadcast towers. It is also great for the government agency that can sell the unused frequency after February 17, 2009. It is lacking (big time) for rural people in fringe areas. These are the very same people that normally want to receive their television signals from antennas if they can't afford or have objections to satellite programming. In my opinion, this government mandate is discriminating against poor people and those who have moral objections to satellite programming for the sake of profit. One other thing is that if you live in an area that needs a repeater (in a valley on the other side of a mountain) those repeater stations will be allowed to continue to broadcast in analog or NTSC. You should check to see if your signal is from a repeater station (low power) or the original station.

__________________
Always use protection.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#17
In reply to #15

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 5:06 PM

Multipath distortion (such as when signals bounce off buildings and take a slightly longer path to reach your antenna, arriving a fraction of a microsecond later) will also severely limit the ability for digital tuners to decode the signal. Not all converter boxes are equal and price is not always a good guide to quality either.

http://blogs.chron.com/consumerwatch/2009/01/higherprice_dtv_converter_box.html

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Van Nuys, CA
Posts: 563
Good Answers: 33
#4

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 5:42 AM

I've just started looking into DTV/HDTV antenna requirements. Found a couple of good reources:

Antenna Research & Development
http://www.digitalhome.ca/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=186

Getting Started with HDTV and DTV
http://www.hdtvmagazine.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=37

How to Make a TV Antenna for HDTV
http://www.tvantennaplans.com/

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 361
Good Answers: 8
#7

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 10:03 AM

According to the information being dished out by the government, if you receive over the air analog signals with your antenna you should be able to receive digital with the use of a converter box. However, the type of antenna you have does make a difference. If your antenna is designed for vhf you will have trouble receiving a strong enough signal for digital reception because of the uhf frequencies used to transmit digital signals. Also, from what I can tell, the antenna must be positioned precisely in weak signal areas to obtain enough signal strength to allow for conversion from digital to analog to work well. Some stations are not transmitting digitally full time yet as they are testing their capabilities and options so you won't be able to receive their signal sometimes. In my opinion, your existing antenna has little to do with your ability to receive the digital stations you are currently receiveing with your rabbit ears. More likely is that the uhf portion of your rabbit ears is able to receive just enough signal to give you reception even though you live in a fringe area. It has to be positioned precisely though or the signal goes away. I built an antenna using coat hangers, a one by four piece of wood, some fender washers and screws, and some #14 wire, and a 300 ohm to 75 ohm adapter. Here is a link to some very good instructions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWQhlmJTMzw

This antenna works very well for me even though I am a good 45 to 50 miles away from my nearest transmission tower. Mounting this antenna in an attic if one is available also works well because it is not very pretty to look at.

__________________
Always use protection.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 361
Good Answers: 8
#8
In reply to #7

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 10:15 AM

By the way, here is a picture of the one I built.

Regards,

Keywalker

__________________
Always use protection.
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gone to Alabama with my banjo on my knee...
Posts: 5595
Good Answers: 20
#9
In reply to #8

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 10:52 AM

Hey, a little paint, and you could tell people it's a sculpture inspired by Picasso!

__________________
Veni, vidi, video - I came, I saw, I got it on film.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 361
Good Answers: 8
#13
In reply to #9

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 3:10 PM

This antenna is actuall in an area I call my computer room and is very cluttered with all kinds of electronics. It fits in quite nicely!

__________________
Always use protection.
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gone to Alabama with my banjo on my knee...
Posts: 5595
Good Answers: 20
#14
In reply to #13

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 3:31 PM

I'm a pragmatist - whatever works is what's right!

__________________
Veni, vidi, video - I came, I saw, I got it on film.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Valdosta, GA
Posts: 361
Good Answers: 8
#16
In reply to #14

Re: The Switch to Digital TV

01/16/2009 3:47 PM

Yeah! me too! (I had to look it up first though)

__________________
Always use protection.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 17 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); av_nut (1); emc_c (2); EnviroMan (2); Keywalker (6); pantaz (1); redfred (1); RickRS (1); Rorschach (1); scotchdrnkr (1)

Previous in Forum: Interfacing 80386 and 80387 Math Coprocessors   Next in Forum: Designing PCBs from Picaxe VSM
You might be interested in: Antennas, Radio Transmitter ICs, Horn Antennas

Advertisement