Previous in Forum: DC Drives   Next in Forum: rajesh
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/13/2010 6:40 AM

Why power system transmission voltage is 32 kV why not 131 kV?

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/13/2010 7:21 AM

32 or 132 ?

Your question should have been why not 125 (after all 132 or 131 either are not that nice looking figure )

In fact I would have gone for a good old round 100.

So why not 100 ?

BTW there are so many threads on this aspect why 11KV. Since you didn't ask that so let me give you another hint 132 KV is twice 66 and you know the significance of this.

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member Hobbies - CNC - New Member Fans of Old Computers - ZX-81 - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Centurion, South Africa
Posts: 3921
Good Answers: 97
#2

Re: why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/13/2010 8:04 AM

Long ago A ask B what should be the confusion factor for power distribution.

After a bit of thought B replied 0.75757575

the result is 100 / 0.75757575 = approx 132

Satisfied?

__________________
Never do today what you can put of until tomorrow - Student motto
Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 86
#3

Re: why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/13/2010 9:17 AM

Hi people,

i read it some text book of electrical engineering which says, if the voltage magnitude is a multiple of its form factor it will minimize harmonics. In this case the voltage waveform is a sinusoidal waveform whose form factor comes out be 1.1(RMS value/Avg Value).

So to minimize the losses all voltages are multiples of 11

correct me if i am wrong

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #3

Re: why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/13/2010 12:56 PM

You are wrong.

Average value = 2/π = 0.63662

RMS value = 1/√2

Form factor = RMS/Average = 1.1107 and not 1.1

And then what has the form factor really got to do with generation ?

There are infact too many posts on this and I should have thought all this aspect is already put on rest except for the Guest.

Reply
Commentator
Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tamil Nadu
Posts: 66
#4

Re: why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/13/2010 9:29 AM

From my memory:Allow 10% line drop.so 3kv:3.3kv, 6kv:6.6kv, 10kv:11kv,20kv:22kv,30kv:33kv,60kv:66kv,100kv:110kv,200kv:220kv

the terminal voltages were optimised per insulation economies.

132kv and 400 kvs appear as the exception

__________________
Better not count the cent if the risk is many many dollars.
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6
In reply to #4

Re: why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/13/2010 12:58 PM

It is not the insulation.

As I remember somewhere someone thought once in dinosaur ages that let there be 10% voltage drop in the line so if you want 100V generate 110.

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#7

Re: why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/15/2010 7:11 AM

What is a kilovolt between friends?

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2061
Good Answers: 169
#8

Re: why 132 kV why not 131 kV?

02/27/2010 1:43 AM

The magic of the Multiples of 11

by: K.Sivakumar, Manager – Training, Switchgear Training Centre, Larsen & Toubro Limited, Coonoor T.N.)

Question: Why Transmission, distribution and utilization voltages are in multiples of 11, as in 110V, 220V, 440V, 1.1kV, 3.3kV, 6.6kV, 11kV, 22kV, 33kV, 66kV, 110kV, 132kV & 220kV?

Answer: It is true only with respect to AC power systems. The first known man-made source of electricity is a cell, which is DC in nature. But, after realizing the disadvantages of the DC electric equipments, AC Electricity generating machines were invented. When these AC Machines were developed, the power of these machines was to be compared with the already available DC electricity, as it is human tendency to compare anything new with the existing ones. As in the case of steam engines.

When steam engines were invented, the power of the steam engines was compared with that of the horses, which were the power sources before the invention of the steam engine.

So, a value called RMS Value for AC Electricity was derived which compared the effectiveness of the AC Electricity with that of the DC Electricity. This value is the Effective Value of AC Electricity. As we were more interested in knowing the effect of AC electricity, all measuring instruments were and are designed to measure only the RMS value of AC electricity – may it be Voltage, Current, Power, etc.

But, for the designer sitting in the design lab, more than the effective value, the average value over a period on one sinusoidal cycle of AC Electricity was important. So, he designed an AC electric Generator, which would produce, on an average, a voltage over a period of one cycle, of say, 10kV (10 is a round figure, you know).

But, when this machine was built to the design and put to operation and when the output voltage was measured, it was found to be 11kV, as the meter was measuring NOT the average value but the effective or the RMS value. This relation existed for any voltage. So, a factor was arrived at – relating the RMS value and the average value, called Form Factor, which is the ratio of RMS value to the Average value, which for a sinusoidal wave form was about 1.1. Then, when the voltage was to be transformed, it was easy to have a whole number for the turns ratio of the transformer and hence all subsequent AC voltages became multiples of 11.

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Reply to Forum Thread 8 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (3); bmadhu_srao (1); electricalexpert65 (1); Hendrik (1); Jans (1); PWSlack (1)

Previous in Forum: DC Drives   Next in Forum: rajesh

Advertisement