Previous in Forum: Stress Analysis   Next in Forum: Old Centrifuge Dynamic Braking
Close
Close
Close
10 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3

Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 5:50 AM

We are trying to hydro a vessel that is 40 ft in dia. and the water level will be appx. 40ft. high. The problem is that we can not get the water from point A to point B. We have a water tank we are trying to suck water out of and by using a 3" water pump and transfer that water with the pump into the new tank. The problem is that the water transfer is very slow. In the last 12 hours the new tank only has 6 ft of water in it. We are transfering the water about 800 ft. from point A by 2 1/2" fire hose, the pump is located close to the input line on tank B. The pump should be able to transfer 200GPM, but at this time I don't think we moving 1/4 of that. Any suggestions. We are going to change pumps as soon as the stores open in our area.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: water test

12/09/2010 7:41 AM

You are pumping at a rate of 78.3 gpm.

Get a bigger pump, shorten the pipe length, or wait longer. It will take 80 hours to fill the tank at this rate.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
Posts: 844
Good Answers: 29
#2

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 8:32 AM

What sort of altitude are we looking at on the syphon side and what is the static head on the discharge side and is this pump rated for the load?

__________________
"Do not worry about your difficulties in Mathematics. I can assure you mine are still greater". - Albert Einstein
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 9:12 AM

The pump is rated at 200 GPM, we pumping from a tank about 800 feet away from the pump and moving the water 38 feet high. Do you think it would help us to move the discharge to the bottom of the tank. This has been topic of discussion here on the job. Some think that it is better to pump it in the top because there is less volume pushing down on the water enterance and some think that there is less head pressure if you pump in the bottom. Thanks for your thoughts.

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member Hobbies - CNC - New Member Fans of Old Computers - ZX-81 - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Centurion, South Africa
Posts: 3921
Good Answers: 97
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 9:49 AM

Sorry - clicked the wrong button.

" because there is less volume pushing down " - The size and the volume do not have an effect only the height.

If it did one can create a "pump" with a big down and a small up pipe.

__________________
Never do today what you can put of until tomorrow - Student motto
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5
In reply to #3

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 10:53 AM

The friction losses far exceed the 38 foot static head requirement.

A three-inch pipe flowing 80 gpm loses 31 feet per hundred feet (31 x 8 = 248 feet).

Initially (tank empty) you stand to gain some pumping to the bottom of the tank, but as the tank fills, you now have to overcome the static head of 40 foot tank pushing back against the pump discharge.

But again, the friction head loss is the problem as it far exceeds the lift requirement.

Since friction head is a function of pipe velocity squared, you really can't get around this problem with such a small diameter pipe.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX USA
Posts: 844
Good Answers: 29
#6

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 10:57 AM

I'm more curious about where you're getting it out of the supply tank.

__________________
"Do not worry about your difficulties in Mathematics. I can assure you mine are still greater". - Albert Einstein
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Electrical Construction

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mid Western USA - The Corn Belt
Posts: 1439
Good Answers: 58
#7

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 12:09 PM

Are there provisions for vacuum relief of the supply tank?

How about pressure relief on the receiving tank?

Just my $0.02

__________________
The first 5 days after a weekend are always the hardest................................
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 12:49 PM

The static head is 16 feet, yes there is a vacuum relief on both tanks, we can't shorten the distance between the 2 tanks and fire hose is all we have to pump through. Thanks for all your help.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Electrical Construction

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Mid Western USA - The Corn Belt
Posts: 1439
Good Answers: 58
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/09/2010 5:09 PM

By the way, welcome to CR4!

__________________
The first 5 days after a weekend are always the hardest................................
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#10

Re: Water Pumps Question

12/10/2010 1:14 AM

Your pump may be rated 200 gpm at say 60 feet of head, but because of frictional loss (pressure drop ) in the hose, you are most likely pumping against a much greater head (total dynamic head) than you might have realized; say 120 feet of head. As a practical matter, 150 gpm is about as much as you can run through a 2.5" hose. That would take about a 15-hp pump, maybe getting by with 10.

That was very off-the-cuff, but I think your experience confirms it. Your tank is ~376,000 gallons. At 150 gpm, that's 2500 minutes!

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 10 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); gatlow (2); Hendrik (1); KJK/USA (2); RDGRNR (2); Tornado (1)

Previous in Forum: Stress Analysis   Next in Forum: Old Centrifuge Dynamic Braking

Advertisement