Innovations, Many, Could Help Save The World...

Wow, you are representing USA, thanks...Why not show the world what USA like to do with the earth. Could we show this to the US Government? Leopold is out of town, my name is Stone and I, as well as many other people do understand why there is war going on with US all over the globe. Peace and hope...

This looks like fun......

<subscribes>

Yeah wot he said!

Son of Editor Crankshaft

My wife got an awful impression on me when I'm laughing myself on the screen or not. CR4 made my crazy. LSS, new term for this is LCR4S

Whee--it's the Energeezer Bunny again!

Is your presentation a signal to us that you have started?

Inventing?

Invented the items?

Want to invent?

Need to be invented?

Have been invented by others?

Maybe it is an attempt to raise venture capital?

Or is it just plain bragging?

Your English is not up to (Swedish) scratch and causes misinterpretations as well.

Saving the earth?

Ky.

Oh, really? yer done? you've brought water to the desserts? Did ya bring water to the blueberry pie?

_{mmmmmmmmmm....blueberry....}

_{Cajun sister of Editor Crankshaft, Sir}

I´m allways surching for the talented people...

Do you really think that an intelligent talented person would want to team up with you? Get in touch with your team of associates? The way you present your self is very unprofessional and irritating, even for a free spirited open minded and artistically talented person such as myself.

When was the last time you paid a bill from your patent attorney? I think you are wasting your bluff, at least on me.

Anything nice to say about Australians, while your at it?

I smell a rat, Ky.

your you're

The contraction of 'you are' is you're.

So given "Anything nice to say about Australians, while your at it?"

Means;

Anything nice to say about Australians, while you are at it?

I.e. 'guest', with out productive explanation, is 'editing' your grammar - though obviously not prepared to assume the monumental task of 'editing' the OP's, some of which you copy/paste _{[without correction or alteration, or interference with the authors statement - i.e. verbatim - which of course is the proper protocol]}

So one presumes, guest feels anyone applying 'verbatim' - should be the one subjected to pedantic scrutiny.

Dear disorientated people, Leo use to sing this song and this so people around the earth could understand that the earth is one thing and the human something utterly unusual, even those who not understand where we, as human, will be tomorrow. We destroy the earth day by day, and most people do not doing anything at all to take care of the Globe, no respect at all they show, not for anything at all, not even for other people who really work for saving our planet.

My name is Stone and I have known this fantastic man Leo for many years now, he will do anything for the earth and he work always for helping the earth from more pollution from all of us people. Here, in these pages, I have never heard so many negative people talking about things they don't have any clue about. Sorry to say this, but you do not have any respect for our planet at all, our beloved EARTH.

PS. If you need help to understand anything, ask someone who could help you, and don´t be rude, not even to your cat. Rude peoples signal is only "I´m bad, and need help".

Could it be mother Earth who's singing for you, ok?

When you need someone to turn to, Turn to me.

When the whole world turns against you

And life won´t let you be

When you need someone to turn to,

Turn to me…

When questions go unanswered and you wonder what will be

When you need someone to turn to,

Turn to me…

I stand in every corner I´m just around the bend

I´ve always been here for you,

I´ve always was your friend…

When walls closing around here, I´m the one who set you free

When you need someone to turn to,

Turn to me, turn to me….

Please tell Leo that I would like to talk to him. Maybe I could then communicate with a more coherent person. Your evaluation of me and us is simply wrong. The way you grandstand on other peoples shoulders is embarrassing.

I'm over it.

It's bad enough to be CR4 Laughingstock of the Week just once, but it's really offensive to hog the title time after time.

"My name is Stone and I have known this fantastic man Leo for many years now, he will do anything for the earth and he work always for helping the earth from more pollution from all of us people."

Dear Stone

Please explain to Leo that 'mission statements' built around proven impractical concepts is the source of

"so many negative people talking" about things they know are proven impractical concepts.

Please explain to Leo, that the burden of proof that they are practical rests with Him.

And please recognize yourself;

A. Not one 'proof' of practical has been offered by Leo.

B. Leo has avoided all calls for practical proof

C. Leo has made it a 'personal matter' - not a 'civil discussion of facts' - because he has no practical solutions. Neither of his own or 'assumed'.

D. If the world wastes time resources and effort on 'impractical' - the cost to Earth is far more than even the current 'degradation'

wait, does this mean we don't get pie?

Between various renderings such as Leo/Leopold/Lau, Mac Ender/Mak Ender/Makender, etc., it is clear that this individual can't even consistently spell his own name, whatever it is. To say nothing of his repeated butcherings of English.

For engineers, he offers no summaries or prelimiinary calculations of basic concepts.

For potential investors, he tells nothing of the costs of his innovations, nor of the returns they might bring. Anyone who buys in fully deserves to lose his/her shirt.

Apparently he once wrote a letter to Al Gore. I don't know if Gore was stupid enough to reply, but I wouldn't be surprised one way or the other.

Bear in mind that CR4 is fundamentally a marketing/publicity effort rather than a critical-review engineering or scientific entity. Thus nothing around here gets reviewed on the basis of technical merit or lack thereof. I am not aware that anyone around here knows how to do this, anyway, but I hope a voice of sanity pops up out of the wilderness.

I think we as members do informal reviews every time we reply to a thread

these reviews can only be based on the information that is presented by the OP & also the other members.

as you have noted the findings are in no way official, nor in most cases is there unanimous agreement among the members.

the threads started by the Kaputski Group have achieved an unprecedented level of agreement among the members.

There have been efforts in the past to use this forum to bootstrap some level of credibility for a product http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/47195#comment551557

I'm looking to enter the floating energy barge market.

A quantitative evaluation of any of these ideas by any recognizable methodology would be interesting, though not worth the time? The correct phonetic spelling of Aussie "you are" is yer. Didacticists of the world, unite!