I love to start silly but supposedly intelligent discussions.
Many living beings are articulated. That is: They have exo or endo skeletons.
Natural Evolution is a complex set of chained events that fInally produce amazing end results. For example: Extremely perfect biolgical machines.
Nevertheless I dare blame NE of failing in two very important aspects.
First: It has not been able to produce really rotating members ( I understand the dificulty, due to the need to maintain the integrity of nerves and vesels).
Second: The mechanical efficiency of the usually articulated members is VERY poor.
This is surprising, because efficient running is important for survival.
Any partially rotating member, like the human leg, can be compared to a pendulm with an spherical fulcrum (The leg) or a cylindrical fulcrum. and a distributed mass that has a certain Moment of Inertia
To move this member in an oscilatory way (Running) first one or several muscles must accelerate it in a certain direction. Then another set of muscles must brake it and keep working until stopping it and reverse its Momentum to get back to the beginning of the cycle.
The friction in the fulcrum or fulcums is very low due to the sinovial lubrication.
But everybody knows that any closed loop motion by any mechanism free of internal and external frictions is energyless.
Why then Nature loses ALL the energy of both sets of muscles?.
Hard to understand why Nature has not "Invented" some of the energy conservation mechanism that could be used in this case
Take a body, with a pendulum at is botton (Leg) and install a crakshaft in the body and connect it with a connecting rod to the Pendulun (Leg).
This frictioless mechanism will move the leg back and forth without any loss of energy.
The running gait in the humans is extremely efficient in reference with the friction losses with the Ground, because in theory there is no relative motion between the foot and the ground ( Different from the wheel and the road). A good runner can produce a very small impact loss at each step.
The runner can run at very different speeds if he uses a raltively lerge flywheel at the Crankshaft.
But this is a totally crazy setup .
Much more feasiblke would be to install elastic rods anchored at TWO points in the body and at one point in the leg.
Tuning the rods to the MOMENT OF INERTIA of the leg, we'll have again an energyless machanism.
But it would be efficient at only one frequency.
This problem can be easily solved by "tuning" the rod by simply displacing one of the anchoring points in the body.
This displacement can be easily made at the rod "dead" points.
Before sending me to the fires of the Inferno, please ask me if I have made experiments.
chorete