Previous in Forum: DC Power Supply   Next in Forum: UPS/Inverter
Close
Close
Close
23 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster #1

Pay Less for Electricity

02/22/2012 7:07 AM

Has anyone ran a 10kw genrator with a 16 hp electric motor? I would like to know the approx. cost 24/7 for 30 days to run the electric motor to the generator.

Thanks! Vincent Diak

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Commissariat de Police, Nouvions, occupied France, 1942.
Posts: 2599
Good Answers: 77
#1

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 7:10 AM

Is the motor driving the generator mechanically, or is the generator producing power for the motor?

Power costs are: the input power rating multiplied by the time run multiplied by the value of each unit of energy; you'll need to get the units right for this to work.

__________________
Good moaning!
Reply
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 7:41 AM

Hi Crabtree, The electric motor will be driving the generator,and the generator will be supplying my house with electricity. Loads will vary as needed, electric motor will run 24/7 at constant steady load,don't have amp and voltage rating for 16hp electric motor. Would it be better to install a 440 line 3 phase for lower amp draw for the electric motor?

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Commissariat de Police, Nouvions, occupied France, 1942.
Posts: 2599
Good Answers: 77
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 7:56 AM

Oh, tutty tut. There are much more efficient ways of converting power from one voltage/frequency to another these days. However, what is bothersome is why there is a mismatch between what the power company supplies you and the appliances and installation you have to run from it? That shouldn't really happen.

__________________
Good moaning!
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Hearts of Oak Popular Science - Paleontology - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2005
Location: In the Garden
Posts: 3389
Good Answers: 75
#17
In reply to #6

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/23/2012 4:06 AM

Oh, tutty tut.

Ah! Priceless. It does my heart good. Thanks old fruit.

__________________
Chaos always wins because it's better organised.
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#8
In reply to #4

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 10:25 AM

Under this scenario, the 16-hp motor will NOT run at a "constant steady load".

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#10
In reply to #4

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 11:19 AM

This makes no sense as stated. Instead of making us keep guessing, please explain your intended purpose for this setup.

If your intent is to lower the cost of electricity, how is it that you think adding a motor generator into the mix is going to accomplish that? Most likely if that is the case, you are use some factor in the equation that is erroneous.

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1053
Good Answers: 110
#18
In reply to #4

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/23/2012 1:24 PM

Loads will vary as needed, electric motor will run 24/7 at constant steady load,
This is incorrect. The load on the motor will vary with the load on the generator, which varies with the load on the house circuits. If the motor is 80% efficient, and the generator is 80% efficient, then the system will be (at best) 64% efficient, meaning that you will pay 1.56 times as much for electricity as you would if you hooked to the grid in the ordinary way.

However, if you really plan to run the motor 24/7, then efficiency will be much lower, because much of the time there will be no electric load on the generator. This reduces draw on the motor to a low value (perhaps 1kw) but you are getting nothing out of the generator, so efficiency is 0. In the US, this idling would cost you 10-20 cents per hour all the time.

Look into state and federal incentives for solar power. Solar can be very cost effective.

__________________
Think big. Drive small.
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - Old Salt Hobbies - CNC - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rosedale, Maryland USA
Posts: 5197
Good Answers: 266
#2

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 7:12 AM

Approximate cost would depend on the approximate load.

__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in a pretty, pristine body but rather to come sliding in sideways, all used up and exclaiming, "Wow, what a ride!"
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#3

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 7:28 AM

See how much fuel it takes to run it for an hour at average load and multiply it out for 24/7 for 30 days. You could even do it for 15 minutes for an approximation.

If you have access to electricity from the grid, you're not going to like the numbers.

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Optical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Trantor
Posts: 5363
Good Answers: 647
#5

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 7:47 AM

If your 16 hp motor was 100% efficient, and if every other part of the system were 100% efficient -- none of it could be, of course -- you would need 7200 Kw hours of electricity. Call your local electric company and ask what the cost is for 7200 Kw hours.

My guess is that the actual cost would be in the range of $1000 to $2000.

You do realize that you can't get more power out than you put in, right?

__________________
Whiskey, women -- and astrophysics. Because sometimes a problem can't be solved with just whiskey and women.
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Pay Less for electricity

02/22/2012 7:58 AM

I completely missed the electric motor part.

Why would anyone think it would cost less to use grid electricity to run a generator 24/7, when the house meter is already set up to provide electricity on demand?

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Analog and Digital Circuit Design Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Transformers, Motors & Drives, EM Launchers Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Applied Electrical, Optical, and Mechanical

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 1207
Good Answers: 119
#9

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/22/2012 11:07 AM

Electricity to motor to generator to electricity is inefficient. You will reduce operating cost by approximately 40% if you simply use a properly rated transformer.

Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#11
In reply to #9

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/22/2012 1:33 PM

Dear Sir, Thank you for the advice of a properly rated transformer. Do you mean the outside pole transformer,or one that i need installed at the location. My energy origin was going to be solar powered, but the cost is very high for the panels that i would need for the 10kw, very,very high cost.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Cd. Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
Posts: 1023
Good Answers: 69
#13
In reply to #11

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/22/2012 2:15 PM

I guess he meant an indoor transformer only in case you didn't have the desired voltage readily available from the grid.

If you do have the correct voltage, then just use it ! any further conversion will cause extra losses. If you're worried about the electricity bills, keep your usage to the minimum posible and get rid of all those clocks from different devices glowing in the dark (most of them blinking at 12:00) just unplug 'em !

Google energy conversion losses, and you'll see that nothing in the world is 100% efficient, much less rated to produce more than it takes (over-unity fantasy).

Pay special attention to combustion systems.

Regards

__________________
No hay conocimiento ni herramienta que sustituya al sentido comun.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Commissariat de Police, Nouvions, occupied France, 1942.
Posts: 2599
Good Answers: 77
#16
In reply to #11

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/23/2012 3:22 AM

OK, so how are you intending to get the DC power from the solar panel into an AC form, suitable for running domestic appliances? And what's this got to do with a motor-generator set running off the mains?

I'm confused. What a dreadful topic posting.

__________________
Good moaning!
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#12

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/22/2012 1:52 PM

(16Hp x 746 Watts)/80% = 14.920 kilowatt hours per hour.

15 KWh x 24 hours x 30 days = 10800 KWh input energy per month.

Thats assuming the motor is running at full load the whole time of course.

Now if you are using a solar power system as your power source running your panel output into a large bank of batteries and then getting your household power off of them through properly sized inverters would be far more efficient.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 1084
Good Answers: 54
#14
In reply to #12

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/22/2012 10:32 PM

Following on from Tcmtech

10800 kWhr used each month * cost $/kwhr = monthly cost

(Here in Australia) It's about 0.22$/kwhr, hence 10800kWhr*0.22$/kWhr = $2376

Of course the rate and loading will be different but it's still going to be expensive.

__________________
If there's something you don't understand...Then a wizard did it. As heard on "The Simpsons".
Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 16
#15

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/23/2012 12:48 AM

Following on from the above. If grid power is available, there cant be any better economic solution.In the presense of grid power, installtion of solar power panel, a very very very big battery bank, inverters, motor and then generator would be nothing but an effort in futility. Perhaps you will have to build a seperate house or shed to install all of these and undoubtedly.........the set up is going to be very very big..........take into consideration the capital cost involved.........plus the maintaince charges....... it seems to overshoot...... further, it is always advisable to keep standby componenets...........at least if not a standby system .... other unforseen problems and costs would also crop up in due course of time........... considering the whole of it togeteher.........this does not seems to be a practical solution

it seems a pole transformer is available nearby........why not try to utilize it.....talk to the authorities......surely you do have neighbours............how do they cater to their electricity needs?? i find it too hard to believe everybody installed generators

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 595
#19

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/23/2012 3:28 PM

informatically the question is qute

it's if the electric company puts too high price on E->e¯

and your motor-Gen can do ceaper and you had to pay the E not e¯

youd be better ... somewhat so

v.2

if you have a "Good Generator" you'd've EIN < EOUT -- it's sounds possible -- i only don't remember how yet ...

... what if you power the stators of the Gen from Grid . . . there's some more to it

the concept 4 is that if you have your system in one system
it won't generate excess but if you can tilt the system
you'd might be lucky

__________________
ci139
Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 595
#20

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/23/2012 3:45 PM

+ i assume the **24/7 here bears signifficance /!\

-- it** form a system on it's own
but such needs a special very accurate *trigger to higger E level
that* isolates it from it's prev refference time

and we get the Grid (24/7.Hi.X-function) Household

((mu-ha-haa))

__________________
ci139
Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#21
In reply to #20

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/24/2012 4:30 AM

Huh?

__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Hearts of Oak Popular Science - Paleontology - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2005
Location: In the Garden
Posts: 3389
Good Answers: 75
#22
In reply to #21

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/24/2012 4:41 AM

I was searching for the right phrase. You got it.

__________________
Chaos always wins because it's better organised.
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: OZ, otherwise known as Oklahoma were the wind comes sweeping down the plains.
Posts: 159
Good Answers: 4
#23

Re: Pay Less for Electricity

02/28/2012 2:06 PM

It sounds like you've been receiving the same junk mail I've been receiving, just trash it.

Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Reply to Forum Thread 23 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); ci139 (2); Crabtree (3); English Rose (2); ffej (1); Grand Poobah (1); JRaef (1); K_Fry (1); kolokol (1); kramarat (2); mjb1962853 (1); ozzb (1); tcmtech (1); Tornado (1); Usbport (1); vincent Diak (1); Wal (1); Yahlasit (1)

Previous in Forum: DC Power Supply   Next in Forum: UPS/Inverter

Advertisement