Previous in Forum: Just To Say Farewell   Next in Forum: Cause of VFD Damage.
Close
Close
Close
13 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster #1

Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/11/2013 11:30 AM

Hello Everybody,

Does anybody know or have the calculations for buried cable if the required space between conductors are not maintained or if they are not in triplex form. Suppose, three single run conductors are laid down buried flat with no spacing like "ooo", what would be the calculation for the ampacity. Take other considerations like Thermal resistivity of soil, rho=90, ambient temp. = 30 degC, depth=900-1000mm. There are some calculations in IEEE 835 or 839 but not enough.

Does anybody has this complete calculations?

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: Ampacity of buried cable.

06/11/2013 11:54 AM

You don't say where you are.

There's so much you don't say.

Try here:NFPA 70: National Electrical Code®

Reply
Participant

Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 2
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Ampacity of buried cable.

06/11/2013 12:17 PM

Well, this calculations has to be very lengthy and rigorous. I appreciate if anybody has done it before or can give me any suggestion on the ampacity of the cable with this buried configuaration. It was not possible for our case to maintain the spacing. ETAP gives some derated calculation based on ambient temp. and rho (thermal resistivity), but it doesn't give any calculation if spacing cannot be maintained. NFPA 70 doesn't actually say anything about it.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Ampacity of buried cable.

06/11/2013 12:19 PM
Reply
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Ampacity of buried cable.

06/11/2013 3:04 PM

See previous threads on CR4 as we have answered this common question to death over the years.

Hint - this derating information is available from the cable manufacturers.

__________________
jack of all trades
Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#4

Re: Ampacity of buried cable.

06/11/2013 12:20 PM

Yep. British Standard 7671. Again <sigh>.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#6

Re: Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/11/2013 7:12 PM

If the spacings between conductors are unknown, assuming it was a triplex cable would serve as a worst-case scenario.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply
Power-User
Hobbies - Musician - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Brigham City, Utah
Posts: 163
Good Answers: 5
#7

Re: Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/11/2013 9:56 PM

Don't know if this will help, but this company has some excellent resources and even apps for smart phones that help you calculate ampacity, wire size, etc.

http://www.cerrowire.com/ampacity-charts

Good luck

__________________
Kindness knows no boundaries.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: 100 miles North from the World Center
Posts: 879
Good Answers: 42
#8

Re: Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/12/2013 9:14 AM

Since no voltage is mentioned I suppose it is low voltage.

From NEC [low voltage cable] 310.15 (B) Tables.

Table 310.15(B)(16) Allowable Ampacities of Insulated Conductors Rated Up to and Including 2000 Volts, 60°C Through 90°C (140°F Through 194°F), Not More Than Three Current-Carrying Conductors in Raceway, Cable, or Earth (Directly Buried), Based on Ambient Temperature of 30°C (86°F)*

No distance between these 3 cables it is required.

This is an "official" ampacity and AHJ will refer to this, I guess.

310.15 (C) Engineering Supervision [in Excel language]:

I=sqrt((Tc-Ta)/(Rdc*(1+Yc)*Rca)

where:

Tc = conductor temperature in degrees Celsius (°C)

Ta = ambient temperature in degrees Celsius (°C)

Rdc= dc resistance of conductor at temperature Tc

Yc = component ac resistance resulting from skin

effect and proximity effect

Rca= effective thermal resistance between

conductor and surrounding ambient

See:

AIEE Paper 57-660, The Calculation of the Temperature

Rise and Load Capability of Cable Systems, by J.

H. Neher and M. H. McGrath.

Rdc=12.9/CI copper conductor 75dgr.C CI=circular inches -expression(10)

Yc=Rac/Rdc=1+Ycs+Ycp Ycs=skin effect factor Ycp=proximity effect factor (20)

Rdc=12.9/CI copper conductor 75dgr.C CI=circular inches -expression(10)

Yc=Rac/Rdc=1+Ycs+Ycp Ycs=skin effect factor Ycp=proximity effect factor (20)

Rca=Re'=0.012*roe*n*[log(Dx/De+LF*log[(4*L/Dx)*F]] thermal ohm/ft (44)

Dx=8.3"[approx.211 mm] L=900-1000 mm[cable centerline depth]

F=(d21'/d21)*(d23'/d23) for the middle cable as hottest.

let's say for 900mm depth d21'=900*2=1800 mm [aprox]

let's say d21=cable o/d=50 mm

correct d21'=sqrt(1800^2+50^2)~1800 mm

d23=50 d23'=1800

F=1800/50*1800/50=1296

LF=load factor[usually=0.7-1]

You may calculate the ampacity following IEC 60287-1,2 also.

__________________
Julius
Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#10
In reply to #8

Re: Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/12/2013 12:51 PM

Hi 7anoter4:

Many thanks for your info.

I must say you are only one here who have understood the problem and given a close solution. There are many "Gurus" here who have a tendency to jump to all sorts of questions and try to answer those. I have clearly requested if someone has done it before.

Now, let me give you the full picture if you are able to help me. The cable is an URD cable 25kV 3-1C 250MCM buried underground at a depth of 1000mm. It is supposed to be placed with a spacing of 190mm in flat configuaration between conductors or in triplex form (we are not considering this triplex form here). But the spacing could not be maintained due to some reason and they are placed flat with no spacing in between and looks like "ooo". According to CEC, the ampacity should be 361 amps if spacings are maintained. My question is how do we calculate the derated ampacity since no spacing is maintained?

Thanks.

Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2004
Good Answers: 31
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/12/2013 1:54 PM

361 x the de-rating factor for touching cables. 303 Amps. Max, for the route length.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2004
Good Answers: 31
#9

Re: Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/12/2013 11:09 AM

Your de rating factor is that, where the cables are closest, and that you can apply to the whole route. Decide over what distance you have the cables touching or in very close proximity to each other and simply use the manufacturers calculation which is simple. Without checking, your de rating factor is around 0.81 to 0.84. If you had maintained the spacing, I am sure the factor is 0.9. Not a great deal is gained.

The calc's in IEC and IEEE are sufficient for use. Easiest, call the cable manufacturer or designer or consultant for the calc's. You are obviously not either of them.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: 100 miles North from the World Center
Posts: 879
Good Answers: 42
#12

Re: Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/13/2013 12:00 AM

First of all, I agree with IQ. In order to calculate the ampacity of this cable I need to know cable details as insulation thickness ,shield details, jacket details and the Manufacturer knows these better.

You may send an inquiry to a few manufacturers with no more details like cable voltage, the 100% load current, the soil average temperature, thermal resistivity[RHO] , the depth of cable run and the shield grounding system. They will send you a proposal.

This cable it is a medium voltage cable and in this case you have to take into consideration shield losses and dielectric losses. The expression is showing in NEC 310.15 (C) Engineering Supervision I=sqrt((Tc-Ta)/(Rdc*(1+Yc)*Rca) it is not suitable for this cable.

I=sqrt((Tc-Ta-DTd)/(Rdc*(1+Yc)*Rca') [expression no.9].

Rca'=Ri+qs*Rse+qe*Re' thermal-ohm feet [exp. 8]

__________________
Julius
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: 100 miles North from the World Center
Posts: 879
Good Answers: 42
#13

Re: Ampacity of Buried Cable

06/16/2013 1:56 PM

I think there is not significant difference between flat arrangement without distances and triplexed.

According to NEC Figure 310.60 "Cable Installation Dimensions" maximum depth to the top of direct buried cables shall be 900 mm (36 in.).

Table 310.60(C)(85) Triplexed single RHO 90 cond.temp. 90 dgr.C ambient 20 dgr.C.

for copper conductor 250 kcmil permissible 390 A[Detail 7].

For 30 dgr.C ambient using equation: I'=I*SQRT(Tc-Ta')/(Tc-Ta))=I*k k=sqrt((90-30)/(90-20))=0.9258

See: 310.60 Conductors Rated 2001 to 35,000 Volts (4) Ambient Temperature Correction.

Then I=390*.925=361 A.

According to (2) Burial Depth of Underground Circuits. (b) "Where burial depths are deeper than shown in a specific underground ampacity table or figure, an ampacity derating factor of 6 percent for each 300-mm (1-ft) increase in depth for all values of rho shall be permitted."

So for only 100 mm more than 900 mm the derating factor will be 6/3=2%

361*(1-2/100)=353.8 A

Calculated for flat arrangement and no clearance between cable-as the proximity effect will be a little more-the permissible is 353 A.

Remark: the shield shall be grounded in one single point only.

__________________
Julius
Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 13 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

7anoter4 (3); Anonymous Poster (1); IQ (2); jack of all trades (1); lyn (2); marahman2 (1); PWSlack (1); Techart (1); Tornado (1)

Previous in Forum: Just To Say Farewell   Next in Forum: Cause of VFD Damage.

Advertisement