Previous in Forum: Flow Gauge   Next in Forum: Pulse Input Read in PLC
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 7

Inline and Co Planar Pressure

07/18/2013 5:56 AM

What is the difference between inline and coplanar pressure measurement

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#1

Re: Inline and co planar pressure

07/18/2013 6:05 AM

One dimension.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#2

Re: Inline and co planar pressure

07/18/2013 6:07 AM

Is there a difference?

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
2
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Technical Fields - Education - New Member Fans of Old Computers - Apple II -

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 191
Good Answers: 46
#3

Re: Inline and Co Planar Pressure

07/25/2013 12:16 PM

The only thing that comes to my mind is the difference in Rosemount brand differential pressure (DP) transmitter designs, from the legacy "in-line" Rosemount model 1151 transmitter to the newer "coplanar" Rosemount 3051 transmitter. I cannot be sure this is what you are referring to without more information.

In the "in-line" 1151 design, the two isolating diaphragms are parallel to the sensing diaphragm. One of the problems of this design is that changes in bolt stress at the isolating diaphragm flanges resulting from temperature swings will influence the sensing diaphgram's ability to sense pressure. With the "coplanar" 3051 design, the isolating diaphrams and associated flanges lie in a plane perpendicular to the sensing diaphragm, thus helping to de-couple the sensing diaphragm from those bolt stresses.

The new 3051S "supercell" coplanar design is even better, with the sensing diaphragm located inside of a capsule detached from the isolation diaphragm assembly entirely by two capillary tubes. This is one of the reasons why the 3051S can be sold with its calibration warranteed against drift for 10 years (versus 5 years for the regular 3051).

__________________
They call me "lightning" when wielding a hammer, because I never strike twice in the same place
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Register to Reply 3 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

PWSlack (1); tonykuphaldt (1); Tornado (1)

Previous in Forum: Flow Gauge   Next in Forum: Pulse Input Read in PLC

Advertisement