Previous in Forum: Sound Based Feedback System   Next in Forum: PF Correction Capacitor Requirement
Close
Close
Close
29 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9

NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 1:02 PM

Anyone know of an accurate non-555 based timer that can run .1 to 10 seconds? Most of the off-the-shelf timers for 12V use run from 1-999 seconds and because of the 555 capacitor issue, never offer the same result when triggered to quickly in sequence.

Simple 5-12V power source, low-current NO-C-NC outputs & push button or potentiometer delay control.

Having a real problem finding an internet source. Anyone?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Central Canada
Posts: 677
Good Answers: 28
#1

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 1:45 PM

Is this for windshield wiper delay ? if so google that, " wiper delay circuit should get you drawings.

__________________
Smart as a post and twice as fast.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Central Canada
Posts: 677
Good Answers: 28
#5
In reply to #1

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 4:39 PM

It would be helpful if the OP would clue us in on the intended application.

Or even respond lol. Maybe I am too impatient :))

__________________
Smart as a post and twice as fast.
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 27
#9
In reply to #1

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 9:22 PM

Windshield wiper delay would never have NO/NC output. I need to trigger and input and have a NO/NC contact activate for between 0-9.9 seconds. Very similar to a car alarm that sounds a siren for 30 seconds when a motion detector sends a pulse.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7025
Good Answers: 207
#2

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 4:11 PM

this style comes in decons also

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Central Canada
Posts: 677
Good Answers: 28
#3
In reply to #2

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 4:29 PM

nice. Out of spec, but nice, lol. ( I ass u me theres other units with 0.1 to 10 sec ).

__________________
Smart as a post and twice as fast.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7025
Good Answers: 207
#6
In reply to #3

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 4:44 PM

my typing was poor, I think you got the idea

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Central Canada
Posts: 677
Good Answers: 28
#7
In reply to #6

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 4:49 PM

Ya, lots of variables out there, Seemed to me he was building from scratch but could be wrong. Specifying a 555 suggested to me he is reinventing the wheel. I went with the DIY approach.

__________________
Smart as a post and twice as fast.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7025
Good Answers: 207
#8
In reply to #7

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 4:53 PM

555's are great timers in electronics. I think he might have a higher current requirement but with almost no info we just guess (whats new?)

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 27
#10
In reply to #2

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 9:24 PM

This timer could never provide provide 1/10th second accuracy.

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9
#19
In reply to #2

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 8:29 AM

Not sure if there's backside to this unit but I wouldn't be sure how to control to the 1/10th of a second with this. Ecspecially becasue it's geared for the 1 sec to 5 min rate. Anything over 10 seconds is overkill. Thanks though!

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#4

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 4:35 PM

Yep. RS Components, Maplin Electronics and Tandy do (usual disclaimers), among others.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 27
#11
In reply to #4

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 9:45 PM

RS Components has almost everything. But trying to simply find a 0-10 second version of this that can do 100ms incraments is no small chore: http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Free-Shipping-1PC-12V-Home-Automation-Delay-Timer-Control-Switch-Module-Digital-display-LED/1317308022.html

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
3
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Central Canada
Posts: 677
Good Answers: 28
#12
In reply to #11

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 11:02 PM

Dear GreenwichCT / GreenTeaGuy :

Start with a stable generator of 50mS; you can use a 555 to generate this frequency only, or use a 74HC121 and retrigger it. If you want insane accuracy, divide a crystal down.

Then feed the resulting clock to a programmable divider, 2 to 101 ( 0.1 to 10 sec. )

There's a stable generator for you. You can program an eprom to contain your divisors; and a simple up/down counter driven by a 2 phase optical encoder would provide the prom adresses for division.

And yes a wiper controller does have NC/NO contacts, it has to trigger the wipers as if you had operated the switch manually. Granted 0.1 second is too fast for a typical wiper control, but still fairly close for high speed wipers. 0.1 second would make the wipers react as if the contact was always closed.

OR you could do all of that in a programmable controller.

If you want a diagram of a cct that works, I need a deposit lol.

__________________
Smart as a post and twice as fast.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Member

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9
#21
In reply to #12

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 8:36 AM

Yes. This is probably the best plan. Thanks for this idea!

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 258
Good Answers: 2
#13

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/05/2014 11:49 PM

Are you awre that there is a CMOS version of same 555 but has a part number 7555.This has leakage currents of the order of nano amps and can be used to get longer times of the order of few 100 seconds etc easily. Internally - as well as external circuit is concerned it is like 555- but you can use mega ohms and micro farads to get longer times. There are many off teh shelf items- but if if you want to understand and build one your self- just use 7555

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#14

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/06/2014 4:35 AM

Crystal controlled PICs would achieve what you want after a relatively simple program has been written for it.

Even the PICAXE versions, running their own style of the BASIC language, should be able to do it very accurately with their even simpler programming language as well as being really cheap....

All needed software and manuals are free to download and use. No hardware Programmer neeeded, just a few resistors and a cheap COM or USB cable form a programming interface and an old PC or Laptop (new Laptops can of course also be used if available!!).

All infos needed are in the free manuals.....

See here:-

http://www.rev-ed.co.uk/

The really good point is that if a need is found to change the way the program runs, this can be easily and quickly reprogrammed, "in situ" if required, to achieve the new requirements......

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Member

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9
#20
In reply to #14

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 8:34 AM

We have 30 or so of these units in our shop:

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=190938375297&ssPageName=ADME:X:RTQ:US:1123

Problem is they can't do 0.1 seconds past 1 second. They do 0-999ms. We need 1.6, 2.3, etc...

Someone else mentioned changing the cap on an off-shelf 555 unit. Perhaps changing the resistor value and upgrading the cap may do it. If a 555 based circuit is set up for 0-9999ms, that might do the trick.

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3
#15

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/06/2014 4:42 AM

A very simple one,

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 633
Good Answers: 13
#16

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/06/2014 8:25 PM

Not sure where you're located, but if you're in US, your local Radio Shack would have the Pic or Arduino Uno or Arduino Micro which will take longer to get out of the package than it will to program for this function. The micro is a 40 pin size version. The accuracy is many times better than any 555 device and it has outputs that can be programmed high or low or as inputs high or low or analog inputs that can sense the pot wiper when the ends are tied to gnd and 5v, 1028 positions. Or you can program it to a led 7 seg display to see the set time. You'd spend more time soldering around the 555.

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#18
In reply to #16

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 4:09 AM

Very well and accurately put!!

But will he believe you (us!)....

Its the only modern way to go.

I paid far more for 555 chips (in comparison!) 40 years ago than the bottom end PICAXE (good enough for the job!) chips do today....and a PICAXE is FAR more fun and far more flexible.....

Though I have to say that I still vote the (43 year old!) 555 as the best chip of all time, but the PICAXE family are creeping up VERY fast!!!!

I do not know personally of an older chip than the 555 that is still produced in the numbers of the 555, but if you know better, please let us all know here, thanks.

The 555 was introduced in 1971 first by Signetics! Though changes and improvements were made by several other companies over the years. As of 2003, it was estimated that 1 billion units are manufactured every year.

For those interested, at least the following manufacturer made them, even the east Germans made copies:-

ManufacturerModelRemark
Custom Silicon Solutions

[8]

CSS555/CSS555CCMOS from 1.2 V, IDD < 5 µA

CEMI

ULY7855

ECG Philips

ECG955M

Exar

XR-555

Fairchild Semiconductor

NE555/KA555

GoldStar

GSC555CMOS

Harris

HA555

IK Semicon

ILC555CMOS from 2 V

Intersil

SE555/NE555

Intersil

ICM7555CMOS

Lithic Systems

LC555

Maxim

ICM7555CMOS from 2 V

Motorola

MC1455/MC1555

National Semiconductor

LM1455/LM555/LM555C

National Semiconductor

LMC555CMOS from 1.5 V

NTE Sylvania

NTE955M

Raytheon

RM555/RC555

RCA

CA555/CA555C

STMicroelectronics

NE555N/ K3T647

Texas Instruments

SN52555/SN72555

Texas Instruments

TLC555CMOS from 2 V

USSR

K1006ВИ1

X-REL Semiconductor

XTR655Operation from -60°C to 250+°C

Zetex

ZSCT1555down to 0.9 V

NXP Semiconductors

ICM7555CMOS
HFO /

East Germany

B555
__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9
#22
In reply to #16

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 8:37 AM

Way tooooo much building! But thanks! :)

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#25
In reply to #22

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 8:55 AM

Actually, the building of a 555 unit is just about the same as building a PICAXE circuit.....but with higher possibility that you will need to re-design/improve with a soldering iron. The possibility that the initial version works first time 100% correctly is very small.....of ANY unit using any technology.

Also, an Arduino/PICAXE unit can be bought built, so basically, only the program needs writing....a few lines should do it.

The Arduino/PICAXE is also easily re-programmed/Tuned, without a soldering iron!!

But the decision is entirely yours, our job is just to tell you "how it is"....

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9910
Good Answers: 1141
#17

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/06/2014 9:04 PM

One way is to use a smaller, higher quality capacitor in a 555 circuit running at a higher rate followed by a counter.

http://www.reuk.co.uk/Timer-Circuits-With-4060B.htm

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Member

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9
#23
In reply to #17

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 8:38 AM

Thanks Rixter. I'm heading in this direction. Great reply.

Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9
#24

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 8:46 AM

Anyone know of a reasonable source to build a prototype? Even a unit like this modified to control 0-999ms, further taking out the push button controls and replacing with a potentiometer where all the user would see is a large readout and knob to increase and decrease time intervals. The timing in this project changes frequently. The key to the finished result is "simplicity".

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 17996
Good Answers: 200
#26
In reply to #24

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/07/2014 9:00 AM

If it has push buttons now, it is highly unlikely to accept a pot instead without major changes to the circuit. The other way round too......

You might be able to interface a digital rotary switch encoder in place of the buttons.....just a thought!

Or just accept the buttons.......no biggy!

__________________
"What others say about you reveals more about them, than it does you." Anon.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 183
Good Answers: 6
#27

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/11/2014 6:27 AM

A thumbwheel switch will give you better setting accuracy. Make a crystal controlled oscillator and divide to 1mS and use presettable counters.

Gajanan Phadte

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 27
#28
In reply to #27

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

02/11/2014 1:48 PM

We found a manufacturer in China to do just that. Small design fee, accurate to 10ms - 100pc order. Well worth it.

Register to Reply
Guru
India - Member - Sensors Technology Popular Science - Cosmology - Dream, Think and Act United Kingdom - Member - New Member United States - Member - New Member Canada - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: AM-51, Deen Dayal Nagar, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, MP 474001, India
Posts: 3418
Good Answers: 32
#29

Re: NON 555 Cyle Timer

04/14/2014 8:56 AM

GreenTeaGuy:


I do have one such precision timer which has 10ms to 100ms precision re-trigger SPDT output possibility.


Give me details on your external trigger input source pulse width, voltage, noise and variations in it and having chances of trigger again while output is active.


We have X10ms interval timer generated from 12MHz clock 100ppm/C and we read time width from push wheel switch 0 to 9 range in which time is used as 10ms to 100ms where 0 is used as 100.


We can also set it as X100ms time intervals and with two switches displaying 00 to 99 you can have timer of 0.1s to 10s.


Write to me if you need help.

__________________
Prof. (Dr.) Shyam, Managing Director for Sensors Technology Private Limited. Gwalior, MP474001, India.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 29 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Andy Germany (4); Antonio.Caldeira (1); Fredski (3); geraldpaxton (1); gmphadte (1); GreenTeaGuy (6); Greenwich CT (4); LongintheTooth (5); PWSlack (1); Rixter (1); Shyam (1); xyz (1)

Previous in Forum: Sound Based Feedback System   Next in Forum: PF Correction Capacitor Requirement

Advertisement