Metals & Alloys Blog

Metals & Alloys

The Metals & Alloys Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about ferrous and nonferrous metals, metalworking processes, and specialty alloys. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Wind from the East?   Next in Blog: Banish Metal Baseball Bats?
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

Posted September 20, 2010 8:01 AM

Like precious gems before them, so-called "conflict minerals" and metals are those from undeveloped regions where profits from their production could fuel ethnic violence. Tantalum from the eastern Congo is one example. Is avoiding use of such materials a problem or only a minor inconvenience with proper international oversight? Should manufacturers be forced to disclose the use of conflict minerals in their products?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Metals & Alloys, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Metals & Alloys today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Technical Services Manager Canada - Member - Army brat Popular Science - Cosmology - What is Time and what is Energy? Technical Fields - Architecture - Draftsperson Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Clive, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 5916
Good Answers: 204
#1

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/20/2010 11:38 PM

If the organization has a quality control system, then yes, the materials should all be documented, and more importantly, specified!

If a corporation has a quality audit, and the management level quality policy states that such materials are unacceptable, then the correct operation of the system will ensure that those materials are not purchased, and that what is purchased is correctly evidenced.

As always, Management has the authority and the responsiblity for appropriate behaviour.

If a corporation wished to sell products which may involve controversial materials, they should pick a side, and stick with it. If their customers wish to purchase fair trade products (for lack of a better term) then they should have access to the evidence of the QMS, or the reporting of a third party organization who has audited that QMS.

If the issue goes astronomical, such as with blood diamonds, then this really isn't a low level debate anymore.. but really, market first..let the market decide, and major players in the market will use their market influence to bias the situation their way.

Chris

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 358
Good Answers: 13
#2

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/21/2010 2:47 AM

There little doubt that smart phone or computer may be fueling one of the most barbaric wars in history, in which unspeakable atrocities are being committed to control minerals used to make laptops, smart phones, and gaming devices. In Congo, as warlords finance their barbarities through selling mineral ore that contains tantalum, tungsten, tin, and gold.

If electronics companies stopped buying those conflict minerals, it could help stop the war by cutting off a major source of money that pays for the militias.

The supply chain is so complex it is very difficult to trace the origin. The truth is electronic companies don't really know whether they're buying items sourced from conflict zones. That's because they rely on their suppliers to tell them whether the minerals come from conflict zones. Hardly any suppliers will tell the truth.

http://www.raisehopeforcongo.org/ shows the concerned citizen a way to combat the scourge. Make a commitment of buy only conflict-free electronics. Send a clear message to 21 giant electronic companies "If you take conflict out of your electronic product I will buy it"

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/21/2010 3:29 AM

Bigger question - Do I worry about what is inside my cell phone or PC when I buy it? No - not at all.

Until the African continent starts producing some statesmen (or women) they will never get out of the mess and I accept zero responsibility for it.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 358
Good Answers: 13
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/21/2010 6:19 AM

Don't you feel that it is with in our powers to collectively force big multinational companies to do business ethically morally and earn profits?

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/21/2010 8:43 AM

Do I feel individuals or groups know 'better'? Generally they do not.

This is nothing more than a method to control the agenda to what individuals or groups feel is correct - force their desire on others.

The wars went on before anyone noticed and will go on until locals manage to control their own business. The corruption of Africa is it's worst enemy.

Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/21/2010 10:01 AM

I'm with Russ, their war is their affair. if they want to kill each other, have at it. If it disrupts my access to needed material THEN it becomes my problem.

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wolfe Island, ON
Posts: 1357
Good Answers: 109
#7

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/21/2010 10:02 AM

The ethics of purchasing or not purchasing "conflict" goods is far deeper than one country can present. We have conflicting ethics and points of view in arms transactions, eating meat, seal hunting, diamond products, oil production, fair trade coffee, environment pollution, child labour, women's right's violations, etc. How does one decide what good is really free of ethical issues. The fact that some despot in the Congo is squandering its resources to purchase arms rather than books does appear to be criminal. But I do know if I don't purchase Tantalum from the Congo, some other company or person will and then compete with a "cheaper" product. We can apply the same logic on any product that may present any sphere of conflict. Do we in the west stop buying Chinese products because they sell arms to support the middle east conflict. Not very likely because we can purchase the other "safe" products from China cheaper.

Unless we have a clear mandate from the majority of nations to define the behavior that one should boycott products, these "conflict" products will a part of human and world business practice. I would love to say I can only support clean products in all my purchases but I know I would be a hypocrite. Many of the products are incorporated into the manufacture of "clean" goods. I will buy those cheap but very satisfactory shoes made in some unknown sweat factory. I would like to say my purchase was naive but in reality I just do not want to think of the manufacturing and source of the good. I question my own ability to be a good citizen of the world and sense of fairness. I do try but do spend money to gain advantage when possible.

__________________
If they want holy water, tell them to boil the hell out of it.
Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Petroleum Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spring, Texas
Posts: 3403
Good Answers: 150
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/21/2010 10:22 AM

The sad fact of the matter is, that whether we buy it from them or not, they will continue to kill each other for any reason they can think of, or no reason at all. (look at the Hutu/Tutsi genocides in Rawanda as a prime example. In many cases the two groups had intermarried to such a degree there was no difference between the two.)

Africa could be a thriving rich continent full of people with enough money to buy Saudi Arabia with their pocket change, if it were not for the corruption and marxism endemic to the governments of the region.

__________________
Who is John Galt?
Reply
Associate

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 54
Good Answers: 2
#9

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/22/2010 3:53 PM

Such over simplification of the situation, on both sides of this discussion, is tragic.

"Make a commitment of buy only conflict-free electronics. Send a clear message to 21 giant electronic companies "If you take conflict out of your electronic product I will buy it""

Do you know how many capacitors there are in the world right now??? The scope of this demand is self-defeatingly unreachable. Black/grey markets will always exist and corporations will always flock to unregulated "waters".

"The wars went on before anyone noticed and will go on until locals manage to control their own business."

So who is controlling the business there now? Them or us? Both?? Vagary can be sabotage.

"look at the Hutu/Tutsi genocides in Rawanda [sic] as a prime example"

The Hutus/Tutsi divide was created by British colonial land divsion policy which favored natives which adopted pro-colonial agriculture and punished those that maintained traditional herding. No place on Earth is an "island".

Just saying....... tragedy on this scale deserves care and attention.

Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#10
In reply to #9

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

09/22/2010 3:55 PM

OK - you pay attention to it then - it is your right to do so.

İ have other more important (to me) things to do like drinking a beer or reading a book or taking a nap.

My commitment is that I will not look at such details.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#11

Re: Conflicted Over Conflict Metals?

02/16/2011 9:31 AM

The world wide moratorium on ivory may have saved the African Elephant from extinction. Yes, there IS a black market, and YES, there is still a problem, but not as much of one. If the wild african elephant had been made extinct, that too would have solved a problem. Which problem solving method would you prefer? (Yes, it really is that simple a problem.)

A world wide moratorium on cell phones would save the mountain gorillas of the Congo and equally as many young drivers here in Canada who are texting at the wheel. Can you see the similarities? Do you think anybody in the "west" cares for more than a moment about it? What are the chances that cell phones will become banned in order to save the gorillas in the mist?

On the other hand, there will ALWAYS be a product, a resource, which will be squabbled over by local gangstas. Ivory, oil, tantalum, slaves, diamonds, and mahogany.

If the "west" gets involved, and refuses to purchase the goods, they will be accused of interference. If they step in and sort out the local warlords, that is called colonialism. (thats the magic word which means don't get involved dude...)

Simply put, the "west" should simply butt out and let them get on with their lives. If they wipe out the gorillas, or the mahogany rain forests, or whatever, then the problem will go away. Damned shame but whatcha gonna do? Keep your kids from buying cell phones? Yeah, that'll work.

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 11 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

chrisg288 (1); Dead Bear (1); kevinm (1); krishnan.ng (2); Rorschach (2); russ123 (3); Yusef1 (1)

Previous in Blog: Wind from the East?   Next in Blog: Banish Metal Baseball Bats?

Advertisement