|
There is a lot of talk about successes in biofuel
production, but less about the technologies that are needed to fit biofuels into
the existing transportation fuel infrastructure. For chemical engineers and synthetic
biologists, the race is on for developing pumps that will do just that.
Chemical and Engineering News says that companies need to
make their pumps versatile enough so that they can be used with whichever type
of biofuels ultimately "wins." Versatility is the key for ensuring that the
companies will make money, and also that the country "will gain energy security
by eliminating dependence on imported oil…"
Chemical engineers and synthetic biologists both have
different approaches. According to Mark Mascal, a chemistry professor at UC
Davis, chemical techniques are considered a broader platform, "because
chemically manipulating carbohydrates, as opposed to fermenting sugars, allows
you to make alcohols, esters, and furans from a single starting point that can
be used to make different types of transportation fuels."
Meanwhile, synthetic biologists have had success in ethanol production,
but this method is limited by its use of alcohols over alkalines and a slow
fermentation process.
Which approach do you think will come out on top?
Source: Chemical &
Engineering News
|
"Almost" Good Answers: