|
Privacy is a tricky thing these days. It's often hard to
differentiate things that are private from things that can be made public.
Today, our computers are a big part of our daily lives. We count on our
computers to provide the news, connect us with friends, keep track of important
information, and so much more. Our computers can say a lot about us. What would
yours say about you?
Yesterday, I was reading the New York Times online and learned
something about laptop computers that I didn't know. When you travel, your
laptop can be subject to search. Although I wasn't surprised, I was still interested
in the justification behind this. Obviously, these searches could be helpful. For
example, the article
explained how a man was caught with child pornography on his computer during a
search. Still, are laptop searches really necessary? Aren't there other ways "to catch a predator"?
Many federal courts in the United States have gone ahead with
this initiative as long as there is "reasonable suspicion". They believe that searching
through a laptop is no different that going through a suitcase. Is this true?
My suitcase generally carries my clothes, toiletries, and shoes; however, my laptop
contains my financial information, pictures of my family and friends, all of my
writing, etc. I think that a suitcase and a laptop are two very different
things.
Much like searching
the Internet, laptop searches are often seen as invasive. In a discussion
regarding this topic, I was told that "if you've got nothing to hide, then what
is the problem?" The problem, as I see it, is that the personal lives of many
innocent individuals may be invaded. It's not hard to find a way to accuse
someone of being "reasonably suspicious". Customs agents don't need to access
medical information, personal journals, or photos.
Advocates for laptop searches all share a similar line of
thought. They say that people can avoid search and potential exposure by
leaving their laptops at home. But I don't think this attitude is realistic. If
you've ever traveled on business, chances are that you've brought a laptop along
with you in order to work, communicate with the office and friends, and access
information for or about your company.
According to the Association of Corporate Travel Executives
and the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), "A suspicionless, unrestricted
search of a laptop computer is simply electronic eavesdropping after the fact.
(It) is distinguishable from the forbidden general searches of Colonial times
only by the technologies involved."
What do you think?
-
Should this be legal?
-
What is "reasonable suspicion"?
-
Are laptops searches equivalent to suitcase
searches?
-
Is this necessary, or are there better ways to
get information?
-
What other countries are conducting similar
searches?
Resources:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/07/us/07bar.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1161335118318
http://www.wired.com/politics/law/news/2007/06/laptopsearches
http://www.eff.org/issues/privacy
http://www.computer.org/portal/site/security/menuitem.6f7b2414551cb84651286b108bcd45f3/index.jsp?&pName=security_level1_article&TheCat=1001&path=security/2007/n2&file=pri.xml&;jsessionid=HDTvC2TBTJXQKHDRClJtZjqz8JCLBp2Cwyp611Vp6D2pHQhscW2z!-390768506
|
Good Answers:
"Almost" Good Answers: