I came across now the thread of 24/10/2014 and I am very disturbed when I read what I wrote in there.
First of all I have to apologize for my-very bad- joke around the name "brich" and I am deeply sorry now if I hurt him in any way.
After about 2 years I saw many of threads in which he participated and I have to say his answers are valuable indeed.
Second, I have to recognize, 10 years ago- my retire date- from up to now my contact with practical world is reduced and my knowledge-even newly acquainted- are theoretically only.
I my time, a technician job was to interpret well an instruction-text or drawing or both-and the engineer job was to make the instructions. I was educated so that I have to treat a job which I never encounter before and nobody will came along to save me.
In these days an engineer needs more practice then theory so the line between an engineer capability and an experimented technician knowledge it is not so clear.
If an engineer has only the authority-that means the right- to sign the papers-I think it is not what has to be expected from him.
I met once, when I was younger, of course, an engineer in a very respectful design institute, authorized to sign the technical papers produced by this institute in almost all countries around USA. I got a very hot advice to keep distance from him since about 80% of his knowledge is useless or even wrong.
So this will be in the future what we’ll expect?
Good Answers: