Searl Effect Generator

Thanks for the three pennyworth (sic) but you seem to have bought-into too much of the Searl spiel yourself. He has never had millions to squander (I long ago obtained all of the financial records of his companies) but, even if he got only £1 from this scam it would still be too much. Incidentally, his much-hated brother has made the biggest lump sum out of the scam. He conned £40000 out of a UK funding agency. When the time comes, I shall report the latter to the relevant UK financial 'watchdog' for wasting money.

Clarke was a lying paedophile. He stole the communication satellite concept from a dead German. In his youth, he made fun of the electrogravitics delusion of the 1950s but then found that there was much more 'mileage', and money, to be had in putting his dubious 'seal of approval' on every possible crackpot idea. "Technology will look like magic to primitive people"? He even stole that (from Agatha Christie). Rossi has proved nothing until his results are replicated by independent, and non-Rentacrank, experimenters.

I am sure that you have listened to the recent podcast, Sailing Beyond Knowledge #42 ('Sailing beyond Sanity' would be more apt). The host, Carlita, repeatedly refers to him as SIR John Searl. Fine, she is an airhead and probably thinks that 'professor' is an insufficiently impressive lie. So how do you explain the fact that neither Searl nor his new poodle, Lockerman, do nothing to correct her? Is that the behaviour of an honest person?

There is nothing wrong with calling John sir. He is a very honest person. You on the other hand are just another idiot who respects nobody. You dont deserve any respect. Searl does.

Now you are just twisting desperately in the wind. You know very well that calling someone 'Sir John' means that one believes that he holds a knighthood. Please stop embarrassing yourself by defending this lost cause; it is pitiful to observe.

I dont care what you say. I believe Searl and all the other free energy antigravity time travel teleportation people. Just because most people in the world are indoctrinated does not mean I have to be a sheep following the pack. I will follow Searl and other maverick inventors. the above things are possible. In fact Searls and the other inventors devices can do the above. I am following the scene. There are many of them now. I am downloading patents especially the Searl replication the Russians did and one by a guy called Mark Tomion. I will find the money to build one of these patents or several others. I totally believe Searl and the others. This is not a lost cause. It is just beginning.

You do realise, I hope, that a patent is not proof of anything. It is a convenient fallacy that 'examiners have to see a working model' before granting a patent. Add to this the fact that some patent examiners and patent lawyers are themselves crackpot inventors, and the whole system becomes a joke. One head of the USPO was a devil-worshipper. I wonder if it still rots from the head down? Download a few thousand more patents and you might begin to catch up with me. The latest 'reactionless propulsion' patent (this month) is so demented that one wonders whether the USPO is simply exploiting the mentally ill for profit.

I note that you have still not answered my question: why did Searl or Lockerman not comment on the airhead's thinking that he had been knighted?

I dont care what you say. Free energy and antigravity time travel and teleportation is possible . I will keep on looking for money to build a starship capable of travel to the stars. There are several others who I am in touch with who are capable of doing the above.

I still don't see any explanation from you as to why Searl did not correct the mistaken belief that he has a knighthood (I think that the airhead also said that he has a Nobel prize, but I may have misheard). Don't you think that this 'passive lying' of his might just be indicative of a generally dishonest personality? Sir John Searl, haha. The Queen may have been stupid enough to put another perpetual-motion/antigravity believer on the Civil List (thus giving him the same rare accolade that was given to Faraday and Herschel) but even she is not that stupid.

I am not interested in minor things like that. i still trust Searl and other free energy researchers.

You think that that is a minor thing? Sure, an interviewer making the mistake once would be minor, but someone not correcting it on any of the many possible opportunities when it was repeated during the interview: that smacks of utter dishonesty. But we know that already from his long record of forgery, desertion of a military post, theft, malicious damage and misrepresentation.

It is not a lost cause. Even Paul Murad has joined the club.That tells me that Searl is for real. you have lost. Either Searl will get funding and build it or Paul Murad who has funding will build the device. There is a company called Archer Energy. They are well funded. I have the book written by Mark Tomion. It is also a derivative of Searls device. How will you stop all of them? You cant.

What do you mean, even Murad? I have a list of about 200 'Rentacranks' who are willing to distort scientific facts in order to impress gullible inventors and journalists, and he has long been on it. Unfortunately, that list does not look good when compared with the millions of rational and honest scientists. I don't have to stop them: reality will do that. But what a pity that money will be wasted that could have backed real scientific projects. OTOH, I suppose that one should really start by castigating NASA for squandering millions of dollars on obvious pseudoscience (oh, yes, Podkletnov was also already on my list). And we shall never know how much the CIA was conned into spending on 'psychic warfare'; just on the say-so of that other perpetual-motion/antigravity crackpot, Harold Puthoff.

Psychic warfare or remote viewing is real. It is an actual psychic power that all people have but some have a high talent for. it is mentioned in ancient texts. Also Hal Puthoff and Murad are real scientists. You are not.

You really are beyond hope aren't you? Do you have psychic ability? You must do, if you declare that I am not a scientist and yet I have not given my name. Or could it simply be that the only real scientists, in your opinion, are those who support Searl and other conmen? Well, of course, that fits in perfectly with my 'Searl-touchstone' and 'Rentacrank' arguments.

God exists and psychic powers exist. Just because you dont believe in anything dosent mean it does not exist. Science still has no answer to the paranormal. Because it is not complete.

As I suspected, pure religious mania! Science does not need an answer to the paranormal because science deals only in what can be observed, and there is no evidence for the paranormal.

That is why science is not complete and not right . A true science must explain everything in nature or it is not correct. The so called laws of nature are wrong. Warp drive free energy and antigravity are possible. Miracles happen. it is a fact that people can change the world by thinking about it and can see the future. Call it what you will. Religion is needed for mankind.

Of course science is not complete, that is why it is still changing (unlike the suppressive self-satisfied dogma of religions and alternative health practitioners). The point is that it is more correct than other ways of investigating evidence because its rules are specifically chosen to eliminate self-delusion. And of course science is helpless when there is no evidence worthy of it, as in the case of perpetual motion, antigravity, flying saucers, mind-reading, spoon-bending, homoeopathy, etc. etc.

Its all real. Even if you say it is not so I will keep on researching these topics and one day make them work. Scientists accept that 10 percent of UFOs are unidentified. These are real flying saucers. There is no doubt about it. Aliens are out there. NASA accepts that there are habitable earth like planets around other stars. That means most stars have one earth lie planet. There is a chance that technological civilisations have come up on some of these planets. It is pure statistics.

Yes, so how do you get around the Fermi-Hart paradox? It seems to me that you are not someone given to deep thought. What is this 'research' of which you write? Are you performing careful experiments, or are you simply looking for internet sites that reinforce your delusions?

Right on ! The Paranormal is indeed not complete, but give it time and it will be

*above: Baron Münchhausen's half-horse (Bucephalus ?) was very thirsty

Keep on laughing. Paranormal claims should be investigated. There is such a thing as UFOs and aliens. NASA has proved there are habitable planets beyond the earth. Ergo there are aliens. Aliens have been visiting us form ancient times in vehicles like Searl and others. Soon NASA will have to accept that antigravity is possible.

Paranormal claims have been investigated: when they are tested by crackpots in other fields, the results are positive (e.g. Puthoff's testing of Geller). When they are tested by skeptics, the results are the same as 'chance' (e.g. Randi's testing of dowsers). You employ very dubious logic with regard to aliens. How, for instance, do you get around the Fermi-Hart paradox? NASA was willing to accept antigravity: that is how it came to waste millions on trying to reproduce an 'effect' which every sensible scientist had already written off as being an experimental artefact. Once bitten, twice shy. I hope!

I dont care what you think. Antigravity is real. Psychic powers exist. Miracles happen. I believe in it. I will one day make money and spend it on building faster than light starships to the stars. Even if science says it is not possible then science is wrong thats all.

Are you a bot?

I think we face one of those "Turing-Test" versions here...

No use listening to you. It is you who are a bot without a independent brain to think.You just follow like a sheep.

We all follow something; that is sort of how knowledge (both personal and societal) advances. But some of us follow the trail of evidence and some of us just follow Judas-goats. Go on, google the term and learn something.

Can this possibly be the same Kumaran who sent me the following message at the beginning of last year?

"Searl is still at it. i am surprised no one saw through his scam for so long. How do these guys get hold of all their supporters and investors. Dont people realise it is a scam. By the way when will your book on antigravity fraud like Keshe and Searl be out. I would love to buy it."

I was wrong. I have realised since then that you are nothing but a loser who doesnt have a job who is harassing genuine scientists. I have decided to give both Searl and Keshe a chance. There is something going on. I believe by 2012 all these guys technologies will be fully developed.

If I were not so busy working with 'genuine scientists', I would have crushed Searl by now. Do you fall for all conmen, or only the ones who use a pseudoscientific gimmick? Do you perhaps respond to those e-mails asking for help in releasing funds? Do you log into your Ebay/PayPal/bank account because an e-mail tells you that their security has been breached? Is that '2012' in our universe, or in one of those alternative ones that you are always prattling about? I expect that you will decide that when you need an excuse in 2013.

I believe Searl and the other guys. That is all that matters to me. The fact that you havent written your book since last year proves you are just all talk. How do I know you are a scientist. Paul Murad is a scientist and he has confirmed Searl. I accept his replication as valid.

So, go ahead and believe them: but don't proselytise for them until they offer some sort of proof. It is not sufficient for one loony to back another one. Why don't you contact the NPL or the NBS and ask them to look into the matter?

I have been researching my 'anti-antigravity' book for some 20 years, so a few more years won't matter. Do you have any idea how many antigravity crackpots there are; how many lunatic 'reactionless propulsion' patents there are to catalogue and laugh at? Anyway, that book is in a queue. I may mention Searl in an earlier book (but only in order to embarrass Murad). I am currently working on a book which has nothing to do with science but could well be a runaway best-seller. Oh, and a previous book of mine has just appeared in a Chinese edition and will shortly appear in a Russian edition. You will be able to see what sort of scientist I am when the anti-antigravity book is finished. You can eat your words then.

You have not written a single book and never have. You are just a fraud. Paul Murad is a true scientist. I believe him over you anyday. I will continue promoting him and Searl and keshe et al over the net.

As I have pointed out before, that is a singularly stupid thing to write since you do not know who I am. You will have plenty of such words to eat by the time that you do know. Meanwhile, Murad is a member of that sad class of scientifically qualified people who publish ludicrously over-imaginative theories (because that wins the adoration of the ufologists and other crackpots), based upon the most mischievous misinterpretations of accepted theory and the dubious 'evidence' of frauds like Searl. It is funny how those who proudly proclaim their 'free-thinking nature' are always the ones who end up marching with the Brownshirts, being audited by the scientologists or shilling for the likes of Searl and Keshe.

I dont believe you. You are not a scientist. That much I know. I still support Searl and the others. You are a nobody. You have written no books.

As I said, 'more words to eat later'.

CR4 ADMIN: Deleted Post

Abuse/Attack: This post was deleted because it was an attack on another user. Please review the CR4 Site FAQ and the CR4 Rules of Conduct.

Dear Admin.

Could you at least tell us what was written in the deleted post ?

This is so Richard Dawkins...

In what way?

Nothing specific - the spirit of things was the same - I admire the guy BTW

He probably thinks that everybody 'writes' books in the same way that Searl does: that is, scan somebody else's work (such as Feynman's Six Easy Pieces) and then add fatuous remarks, pornographic pictures ... and scatological references to me.

It dosent change anything. i still believe in free energy and antigravity as being possible. Ed Mitchell says that is possible along with UFOs so I believe him. He is an inside man while you are a nobody.

How sad to have visited the Moon and yet be doomed to be forever remembered as a crackpot instead of an astronaut. Come to think of it, how does he handle the nutters who say that nobody went to the Moon? Does he suddenly become rational on that particular point?

I dont care what you say. Zero point energy and antigravity are real and i will continue to do research into it. I will learn electrical engineering and use the knowledge to understand patents. I will also figure our a way to make money to do research. I just hope somebody does it soon. i am behind those who are doing research into the field.

That figures: I have noticed (and I am not the only one) that electrical engineers are more likely to be pseudoscientists than are any other technically trained professionals. Here is a thought: why don't you simply buy a doctorate (like Bearden and Valone). After all, if you are going to do worthless 'research', what better preparation is there than a worthless degree?

I am going to do the research. I am an accountant.I will find a way to make money to do such research. I am looking into the stock market as a way to fund research. I dont care what you say.For me zero point energy and antigravity are a reality and I intend to do research on such topics.

Oh, so you are the same Kumaran who was being so skeptical 18 months ago. I know a great way to make a small fortune on the stock market (the secret is shown below). But I wouldn't spread the word that you are accountant; they are generally seen as being bigger crooks than pseudoscientific grifters!

Start off with a large one.

Whatever you say. But free energy and antigravity are real and I totally support research into topics like that and also human conciousness and the ability of the mind to alter the laws of the universe. I am following Ed Mitchells quantrex now. It is quite great. I believe aliens are here also. I hope to travel to the stars soon.

It sounds as if you do not have any immune system at all. One little word of warning: these things are like drug addiction. If you spend all of your time and money on them, you will eventually be able to survive income-wise only by yourself becoming a scam-artist; just as drug addicts have to become dealers as well. So I hope that you are starting out with a large streak of dishonesty (being an accountant is a good start) and can afford a radical moralectomy*.

* Surgical removal of any sense of morality.

I dont care. I want to spend the rest of my life promoting and pursuing free energy and antigravity and psychic powers and all the rest. It is a worthy pursuit in life. Anyway i am not the only one. By 2012 these technologies will become a reality. Already cold fusion is a reality. Hopefully the technologies wont come too late to repair the damage being done due to the greedy people like you.

You think that unquestioning obedience and consequent lying are worthy pursuits?

But haven't you heard, 2012 is the end of the world. Of course, that claim is made by the same sort of people who prattle about psychic powers, aliens and perpetual motion. But you will have to believe them, won't you, because you are incapable of weighing evidence rationally.

"an open mind is like a private dumpster (skip); you own it, but everybody else tries to put their rubbish in it".

I believe that you can choose your future. I am trying to make the future better. The world will end for those who believe it will end. They will go on that timeline. I will make myself chose the universe where earth becomes a paradise in 2012. Already I see on the news more and more people coming up with zero point energy devices. Peswiki is a good source for the latest.

Recessions are always a breeding ground for scams: plenty of desperate people looking for get-rich-quick schemes, and plenty of unscrupulous crooks ready to offer them.

"There are no miracles. What was incapable of happening never happened, and what was capable of happening is not a miracle" Cicero.

Thats just garbage. Miracles can happen and do happen all the time.

Name one.

miracles happen all the time People are cured by the preachers of different religions in the world. They make lame people walk. Anything is possible.

Well, leaving aside the possibility that they might be stooges or dupes (a favourite trick of 'big-top' American healers is to leave 'courtesy wheelchairs' at the entrance, for people who are unsteady on their feet, then have them wheeled up later and be 'cured' of their 'paralysis'), what you are saying is this: someone is given up as being incurable by conventional doctors but later cured by a miracle. Hmm, so which is the more likely scenario; that a miracle has occurred or that a series of doctors (notorious for not wanting to disagree with their colleagues) all made the wrong diagnosis?

Miracles are real. There are people who have the ability to tap into some sort of psychic field or god or higher conciousness in order to do things that seem impossible. Its a fact. Just because you are a godless man dosent mean you should discourage others from believing in god.

No, you choose to believe, without evidence, that they are real. You choose to believe, without testing them, that certain people have 'special powers'. You have abdicated from the world of intelligent discussion.

At least that crook, Sai Baba, is dead. "Another one bites the dust".

Sai Baba is not a crook. I still believe in him. He did a lot more good things than you did. He built schools and hospitals. What have you done? We dont know who you are. You care not a scientist thats for sure. You are just a fraud. You just keep yapping and purring down people who do great things.

Well, he is not a crook now: he is dead. And while giving the odd sop to the suckers to keep them sweet, who knows how much he creamed off for himself. Gee, no wonder that people like Madoff can run their scams for so long if all accountants are as gullible as you. Hmm, gullible or complicit?