Previous in Forum: designing instrumentation   Next in Forum: Performance of the System.
Close
Close
Close
20 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/14/2008 2:52 AM

Dear All,

Please kindly help me,

I have 2 pressure transmitter which 500m far from PLC AI module,

how to communicate the devices without decrease the 4-20mA signal quality?

what is the tips or tricks? Is there any devices that can solve the problem?

Thanks for the help,

regards

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kazakhstan
Posts: 753
Good Answers: 8
#1

Re: 2 pressure transmitter 500m far from PLC

02/14/2008 3:59 AM

I had such experience even for completely analog case. But 500 m is significant distance.

(1) you should get a high quality cable pulled in maximum far from any power one;

(2) cable should be shielded and earthed on side of your amplifier (ADC);

(3) in case of using a parallel connection of two transducers (bad practice) be sure that input impedance of every sensor is the same. I used additional resistors to balance impedances, but it is not good practice as well and should be conducted with care;

(4) assuming bridge circuit of transmitters, it is recommended to apply so-called 6-wires scheme instead 4-wires;

(5) your digital(PLC) and analog schemes should be isolated and not share the same power supply;

(6) plus to (5) it would be good to employ isolated instrumental amplifer like this http://www.analog.com/en/subCat/0,2879,759%255F783%255F0%255F%255F0%255F,00.html

you need one more power supply for this option.

(7) your transmitters should posses very high isolated level, at least 4000 Ohm for >100V testing voltage.

(8) You'll get much less headache if you place ADC and controller near transmitters. I'm sure it's achievable.

Good luck.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2
In reply to #1

Re: 2 pressure transmitter 500m far from PLC

02/14/2008 4:14 AM

Since I am still a junior in this field, please kindly advise me for below case;

We have plan to use 18AWG Instrument Cable, two wire connection, connected to ABB DCS,

1. so, do we have to used an independent 24 dc power supply for the field Instrument ?

2. If we use the amplifier, is it attached at the field instrument, or can be put at PLC panel ?

thanks a lot for your advice and attention

regards,.

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kazakhstan
Posts: 753
Good Answers: 8
#3
In reply to #2

Re: 2 pressure transmitter 500m far from PLC

02/14/2008 4:45 AM

Hi guest!

It's nothing. My recomedations were represented for all "undesired" cases. It does not mean you should apply them all at once.

ABB is good brand and transmitting current signal (4-20mA) much more easy than mV.

You said "We have plan to use 18AWG Instrument Cable, two wire connection, connected to ABB DCS". It means: you already have separated PW supply for you two transmitters parallel connected on field side. Isn't it so? As well it means you have amplifier (believed to be insulated) and mV/mA converter embedded at your transmitters. It's very good also.

I have not any idea about your DCS/PLC but they will got prepared signal. If you'll get troubles you'll resolve its.

So I hope all will go well. If you have some doubts I would advice you before installation check your system when cable is yet coiled.

All will be well. Do not worry.

Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#5
In reply to #2

Re: 2 pressure transmitter 500m far from PLC

02/14/2008 8:08 AM

<...18AWG Instrument Cable, two wire connection, connected to ABB DCS...>

Sounds OK. 20mA will pass down wet string, almost! 4-20mA is very secure as signal transmission goes, as it is practically immune to all bar severe attempts at interference. Provided the cable is something like a shielded, twisted pair, then that is industry-standard, and rarely will problems become apparent.

<1. so, do we have to used an independent 24 dc power supply for the field Instrument ?>

Not usually. The 24VDC power supply is usually, and often, configured to supply a multitude, if not all of the analog and volt-free digital digitals. And the power the instrument needs is derived from the 2-wire loop. That's the beauty of going this way.

<2. If we use the amplifier, is it attached at the field instrument, or can be put at PLC panel ?>

It depends upon the overall loop resistance as measured: the cables in the field, any series indicators in the panel and the input resistance of the analog input all contribute their ohms, and they all add up to a figure. Check the manufacturer's information on the instrument. Most of them have a chart showing maximum loop resistance for given supply voltages. Provided one is in the non-shaded part of the chart, i.e. the loop resistance is less than the minimum for that voltage, then operation will be OK across the whole of the 4-20mA range.

If a 1:1 current amplifier is used to compensate for high loop resistance, it will be found in the panel usually, though it is possible that these days most of the functions that would have cascaded from it in twentieth-century panels can be handled as digital signals in the PLC, HMI or DCS downstream of the analog input. In the configuration outlined in the original post, it would be unlikely to be required as even over that distance, the conductor resistance is relatively small compared to other parts of the loop, though it would need to be checked either against the cable manufacturer's published information or by site measurement to gain confidence.

If there is an excess of loop resistance, one of the solutions is to increase the power supply voltage. In this case, it is desirable to have a separate DC supply for the analog and another one for the digitals. The voltage on the analog one can then be cranked up a bit to compensate for the excessive loop resistance, to get back "on-side" on the chart. Most manufacturers' nominal-24VDC transmitters will operate quite happily on 36VDC, though it pays to check their instructions just in case.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 22
Good Answers: 2
#18
In reply to #5

Re: 2 pressure transmitter 500m far from PLC

02/15/2008 2:26 PM

I believe replies 2, 3, and 5 are all good answers. I would like to add that I do not believe a variable power supply is needed. The resistance of a 1000 meter loop of 18 gauge copper is about 10.8 ohms. Max loop resistance for transmitters are in the hundreds of ohms range. (Of course you need to add input impedance of the AI module.) Another thing is that you will need to calibrate the analog input. With Allen-Bradley systems there is offset and gain compensation settings through the software. If you use a transducer/transmitter then the input calibration corrects for transducer, transmitter, and transmission errors. If the transducer is connected to a meter/transmitter then calibrate the meter first and calibrate the input to the meter. Then the input calibration corrects for transmitter and transmission errors.

Reply
Guru
Philippines - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - Who am I?

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 2147
Good Answers: 53
#19
In reply to #18

Re: 2 pressure transmitter 500m far from PLC

02/15/2008 10:58 PM

I do not believe a variable power supply is needed

Which is why I said that 500 meters is very possible and that he try just hooking everything up before getting a variable power supply.

If in case, the current is not getting through (for whatever reason), he would at least knowing that a variable power supply may be needed.

__________________
Miscommunication: when what people heard you say differs from what you said. Make yourself understood.
Reply
Guru
Philippines - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - Who am I?

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Mindanao, Philippines
Posts: 2147
Good Answers: 53
#4

Re: 2 pressure transmitter 500m far from PLC

02/14/2008 6:24 AM

Every instrumentation book and instrument manual I've ever read says that 1000 meters is the upper limit for transmitting a 4 to 20mA signal. So, off hand, I'd say that 500 meters is very possible.

Most current loops use 24 volts for loop power. I'd advise you to use a variable voltage power supply that can go up to 32 or even 48 volts.

If you have a transmitter simulator, inject 20mA into the loop and measure the current at the analog input. If it's lower than 20mA, slowly increase the power supply's output until the current reads 20mA. Then add two or three volts more for good measure.

If you don't have a simulator, use the pressure transmitter as the current source.

Before you go and buy a variable voltage power supply, why not just try connecting everything to check if it works as it is. It'll save time and money.

__________________
Miscommunication: when what people heard you say differs from what you said. Make yourself understood.
Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#6
In reply to #4

Re: 2 pressure transmitter 500m far from PLC

02/14/2008 8:16 AM

<...use a variable voltage power supply that can go up to 32 or even 48 volts...>

Seconded!

It's handy to have the facility just in case, even if it isn't used.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
#7

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 12:04 AM

Hey guy's

I do a lot of this kind of thing -- not hard (I have done up to 7.3 miles).

But it is necessary to be aware of the environment at both ends if your transducer is

on a chunk of pipe near a stand pipe on hill it can get dicey.

Worst case is use a lightning arrester of the sealed variety on the transducer, I use a Transtector unit built into a 1/2" pipe nipple it is specific for voltage and for 4-20 ma.

Use twisted shielded pair wire ground the shield at the transducer only.

At the PLC end use a powered low impedance input full isolator isolated at all three points the best place to put the separate power supply for the loop is at the transducer , but that is rare to have the power ckt there so at the plc is ok.

The power supply should be a fully isolated out put up to 2500vac rating.

Use a second lightning arrester at the PLC end with fuses fast blow type 1/4 a max. locate the fuses and arrester at the first available point in the PLC enclosure, ground the arrester well.

As far as loop power supply voltage goes make certain that the transducer can take the voltage at less than 1 ma and considering the voltage drops in wire and arresters, as well as the placement of the p/s and possible or likely shorting points.

All of this is for worst case , of course, but that gives the bigger and worst case lookouts.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#8

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 4:39 AM

FIRST WE SHOULD TRY TO CONNECT THE SIGNAL DIRECTY TO PLC WITH THE 5OOMETER CABLE, I THINK IT WILL WORK WITH OUT ANY SIGNAL LOSS.

EVEN THOUGH IF ANY SIGNAL LOSS IS THERE WE CAN USE SIGNAL ISOLATOR

HAVING IN PUT 4-20 mA & OUT PUT ALSO 4-20 mA WHICH IS TO BE INSTALLED NEAR TO TRANSMITTER.THE ISOLATOR WILL WILL TAKE CARE OF CABLE RESISTANCE & GIVE CORRECT OUT PUT AT THE INPUT TO THE PLC.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 282
Good Answers: 16
#9

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 8:54 AM

I just recycled my response from a question yesterday to control a relay 600M away.

If I were going to pay for the expense to pull a 500M cable then I would be dang sure to plan for future expansion. What would you do if next month you wanted to add more control points?

Many of the common PLC's feature open standard network communications. For example, a simple Allen-Bradley DH+ (Data Highway Plus) trunkline can span up to 3000M. It will be very easy to add more analog or digital I/O to the existing network.

Click for info:
http://www.ab.com/en/epub/catalogs/12762/2181376/214372/1491278/

Regards, Delmar Schmidt
Melfi Technologies Houston
www.melfitechnologies.com

__________________
Specializing in Dynamic Weighing Systems for Powder and Bulk Solids Handling
Reply
Power-User
United States - Member - American by birth,southern by the grace of GOD Popular Science - Weaponology - you can't carry that! Technical Fields - Technical Writing - why can't I use a pencil? Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 203
Good Answers: 2
#10

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 9:22 AM

If there is funding I would invest in a "profi bus" system or even an Ethernet system. you will then be making your sensors more intelligent, you will be able to move the data faster and farther.

__________________
The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play... If you think you can or think you can't you'll always be right
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 282
Good Answers: 16
#11
In reply to #10

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 10:00 AM

Ethernet is only good for about 100M length cable segment. Don't know about Profibus

__________________
Specializing in Dynamic Weighing Systems for Powder and Bulk Solids Handling
Reply
Power-User
United States - Member - American by birth,southern by the grace of GOD Popular Science - Weaponology - you can't carry that! Technical Fields - Technical Writing - why can't I use a pencil? Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 203
Good Answers: 2
#12
In reply to #11

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 10:11 AM

OOPS! your right I was more on the data transfer neglecting distance. I was thinking if there facility was Ethernet based they would have hubs in the production area. I took that for granted, as we have 90% of our automation is Ethernet based.(control and monitoring) I like the mod bus and the Profibus , we use both in our facility and it can make an off the shelf sensor a nice communication base tool.Thanks for keeping me on track!

__________________
The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play... If you think you can or think you can't you'll always be right
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Active Contributor

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
#13
In reply to #12

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 11:54 AM

Please don't take this wrong but---

no communication medium is faster than real time -- analog is real time

If the transducers , respond with engineering units , and most do , they appear faster because the PLC/controller does not have to process the signal and again in closed loop with just a few (not hart) transducers it is very fast.

The reason I am commenting on this is that THE BIG SALES thing is Ethernet , Profibus ,and several others out there "it will do it all " kind of attitude. It is like any thing else it has limits and you put all of your transducers, PLC/ controller units , touch screens , and SCADA on one buss it can get DAMN slow!

I have had to "pickup the pieces" after such monolithic thought was applied , so I bristle a bit when the answerer is ****** will do it all.

There is no "horse answer" to this question it depends on his system overall and not just his electrical but also his physical plant.

Yes I am aware that most of the engineers out there question the idea of long 4-20 loops but it does work if it is planed out well and specs are adhered with, Frankly I have never gotten hart or any other com loop to go even close to 7 miles , other than fiber I would not trust any com medium beyond 1000 meters even so called modem types. If the loop is remote, no power, and particularly static or lighting exposed environmentally 4-20 is the best choice , Hart on current may work but exposes the PLC or hart modem to damage , and that "may work" is a question also.

If this old boy has only A/I inputs (no comm loop ) or the transducers are not in the same place then without a doubt the 4-20 or 10-50 ma loop is his best/least cost way to go.

Again please no insult intended just me spouting off , you know opinions are like a$$*oles every one has one and in your face they all stink!!

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User
United States - Member - American by birth,southern by the grace of GOD Popular Science - Weaponology - you can't carry that! Technical Fields - Technical Writing - why can't I use a pencil? Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 203
Good Answers: 2
#14
In reply to #13

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 12:33 PM

Nope on offence at all!!! I am old school too. I like the new technology as good as anybody , but there are far and few between that can even begin to trouble shoot some of the analog systems out there. I try to make it easy on the newer guys to plant control. The need for speed and automation and making things easier sometimes makes things more complicated. I can slam out some relay logic quick and have something up and running before some can spec out a micro plc and get a price on it.

We have a lot of temp control devices here and they are all I to P 4-20/3-15. and there is 4 guys out of 30 can can tune it. Thank you for the input and I enjoy any feed back. It only makes us all better!!!

__________________
The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play... If you think you can or think you can't you'll always be right
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 282
Good Answers: 16
#15

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 12:49 PM

No offense here either. I comply with the KISS procedure for any of my projects. However pulling another 500M twisted pair for every I/O expansion will not be a simple task.

I agree that the older Ethernet networks are not real-time and can be easily bogged down by excessive network traffic. We typically specify newer Ethernet/IP, and always dedicate our network to only reading the loadcells and controlling our motor drives. We dedicate a second Ethernet/IP network card for communicating to a customer supervisory system.

It is possible to communicate long distances over Ethernet/IP using fiber switches. However the added complexity and cost would be overkill for this simple application monitoring only a few pressure points.

(why are the responses to this thread being hidden?)

__________________
Specializing in Dynamic Weighing Systems for Powder and Bulk Solids Handling
Reply
Power-User
United States - Member - American by birth,southern by the grace of GOD Popular Science - Weaponology - you can't carry that! Technical Fields - Technical Writing - why can't I use a pencil? Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 203
Good Answers: 2
#16
In reply to #15

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 12:57 PM

You can check the off topic comment box and it will reduce it down so the ones who don't have time for nonsense does not have to read it. I find it all good but I hate the off topic score and the remarks of the ones who traded there funny bones for degrees.

__________________
The more complex the mind, the greater the need for the simplicity of play... If you think you can or think you can't you'll always be right
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Active Contributor

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 22
#17
In reply to #15

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/15/2008 1:51 PM

Thanks guy's

I had the notion that I was going get some flack out of my last.

Admittedly I am an old goat (been at this for 40 years) and relied on some "old tech", but it is with reason some of the "new" is way over sold, and the sales people out there are pedalling stuff that they have no concept of. I have electrical "pipe and wire" people in my office all the time trying to sell the newest widget from VFDs to PLCs and even DCS and SCADA.

If you want to see confusion on a face ask them to define the difference between PLC and DCS --- Its a kick!!

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Long.92E,Lat.26N
Posts: 1336
Good Answers: 14
#20

Re: 2 Pressure Transmitter 500m far From PLC

02/16/2008 10:16 PM

Back to fundamentals-and KISS !

Problem: Reach a 4-20mA signal from point X to point Y (500m away)fairly accurately at minimum cost,max reliability.

Solution:

At X the originating 4-20 mA be dropped through series-- 2 small silicon diodes+500 Ohms. You get ~1V+(2>10)V signal . Call this C

(At X)-Take a small NPN silicon Transistor .Feed DCV ~16>20 to collector. Feed Cto base. Load 1000 Ohm Emitter to ground. You get ~0.5+(2>10)V at Emitter to Ground. Call D

Send D to 1Km >2Km> ( which is point Y )via a twisted pair and feed +D to base of another single transistor signal repeater like at C. Here you load Emitter to Ground=500 Ohm and take out 4-20 mA between Power supply +and Collector.

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 20 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); caramba (2); Delmar (3); JonRR (3); logix101 (4); mfiedler56 (1); MUKULMAHANT (1); PWSlack (2); Vulcan (2)

Previous in Forum: designing instrumentation   Next in Forum: Performance of the System.

Advertisement