Previous in Forum: Solar Pannels   Next in Forum: Português
Close
Close
Close
48 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 6

Water Batteries

08/03/2008 6:06 PM

Greeting to all those on this site

While listening to 'Joe talking' on u tube last evening, there was one discussion where he was sharing his intuitive views on the properties of stainless steel. While in that line of thought he mentioned the use of a salt water battery using copper and aluminum. Standard procedure right? The exception was that sand was added to the electrolyte and may be responsable for developing a 'combination effect.'

We may know the properties of things when used independently, but when put together in combinations, the individual properties may change. So there are 'field effects.'

For instance, one of the properties of 316L steel is that it a poor conductor of heat and energy. In my flame testing using vortex implosion, stainless steel heats up much easier than most common metals. Even titanium can be made translucent with the propane from a barbecue tank. Giving the flame implosion properties reverses what we know about generating energy in the exothermic state.

Water can be changed into a burnible fuel by changing its frequency. Water into wine anyone?

Back to the water battery. When listening to Joe talking about the water battery, it occured to me that a a conical anode and cathode this neutral conicals may prove to be a highly effecient 'salt water battery.' Any comments on this? Envision a Joe Cell made into a water battery using salt water and sand as the physical seperator.

If back EMF is generated by a 'collapsing field' whether it be magnetic or not, the opposite and equel reaction is that a water battery can generate dc from a self-inducing spike. The combinatin of the two metals, salt water and sand using a Joe Cell format may just do something this strange and wonderful. So now we have a water battery that is connected to the energy of the earth. Anyone venture to comment on all this. Would be a simple test to do. The galvanic reaction between the copper and the aluminum could set up an induces charge in the sand to trigger a collapsing field energy.

I've no phd's behind my name. Just a highschool grad. But I am connected to the source which counts for something. John Keely gave inventiveness to a higher power, so did Tesla, Stanley Meyers, Paul Pantone, Slim Spurline, and even Joe.

I'm just a pilgrim passing through this life but my heart is to see people independly free from the system given the choice, and the freedom to come together in community. By coming together like sticks in a bundle can we become unbreakable. It is time for the masses to wake up and be freed from the matrix.

Looking forward to you sharing your comments and expertise. Thankyou, Joshua.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User
Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member United States - Member - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 440
Good Answers: 7
#1

Re: Water Batteries

08/04/2008 12:39 AM

Time to get some salt water, aluminum and copper and start playing.--Does temperature effect it? Depth? What's the voltage? Can it be run in series as cells in a battery to increase the potential?

Dissimilar metals in saltwater have a destructive force --Maybe it can be harnessed-- don't accept convention and you don't need to quote anyone, unless it's not your opinion.

WhoTF is Joe on youtube?

I like your post, Joshua. I wish I had the answers, but I too have the same questions.

__________________
Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand --Kurt Vonnegut Jr.
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 6
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/04/2008 4:15 PM

Hi Kilgore

Not to far away from you. In Port Aberni for the moment about an hours drive nw of Nanaimo.

Ever since making contact with Martin Hunter in the early part of the 90's I've been having an awakening so to speak. He is he director of the National Institute For Inventors in Seneca, SC. Much of what is now on u tube, he was getting out supressed technology worldwide by snail mail. Never met the man, but am planning on going down that way sometime the latter part of this month.

There may be a way to design a copper-alluminum battery where it will be zero corrosive and be able to release much more of its energy. As I undertand, the catylist, salt or whatever in the water, is responsable for encouraging the electron flow.

The Joe Cell was named by Joe who invented it in 1995 downunder. He did not name it after himself, but those who tried to duplicate his work did. If you go to u tube, and type in 'Joe Cell, Joe talking', you will be able to listen to him firsthand.

In order for the Joe Cell to work, it must first be filled with 'charged water' not salt water. A charging cell using the same configuration is used to charge the water then put into the Joe Cell on the vehical.

The neg. and pos. flow together on a pathway like unto a mobius coil. Electron flow go out and comes back in a complete cycle. As this happens, it causes a collapse of the field energy resulting in a spike. This spike completes the triangle of energy.

As the water is being charged, the water being mostly acidic is phase changed which increases the ph. The health of our bodies depend on a high ph of 8.4 to maintain a high immune system. The water also has an immune system. High ph water will be tasty to drink having a neg. charge and cold. Its the impurities in the water that cause the water to heat. As the impurities come out of the 'molecular state' of the water, the water now takes on 'zero resistance' or becomes 'superconductive.' As you know, water takes on intension which has been proven by that Japanese doctor.

All this tells me that if water that is in the superconductive state is used in the battery regardless of the type of annode and cathode, it will produce an exponential electron flow. There would not be any need to add anything to overcome the resistance in the water. Water that is electrically pure will conduct electrons with very little heating. This is all very basic stuff just that no one that I know has connected all the dots to make it work.

Instead of producing 1 or 2 volts per cell, the water battery should produce on a level on one magnitube or higher.

Also, the best anodes and cathodes to use would no longer be metal but carbon rods. You would no longer need the potential difference to encourage electron flow. You now have a very simplified water battery with zero catylist.

As the water is now in a state of zero resitance, it now becomes a sort of accumilator of energy. You don't have to generate the energy chemically. Tesla, Keely, Morray, Brown, Gray and others were able to tap into the energy that exists all around us.

My best gues is that the battery would generate some kind of energy field or bubble that would capture the radiant energy. Water is universal and in its superconduve state can be tuned to any frequency. Haven't done this yet, just know that it will work.

So the first step is to build a charging Cell using the JC configuration, and start perfecting this new kind of water. New Water is the term given to it. If you drink it, it will put put your body back into alignment so that it can heal itself. We get sick because our energies get out of alignment.

ALL THOSE WHO READ THIS POST I CHALLENGE YOU TO PUT WHAT I'VE SAID TO THE TEST. YOU'RE THE EXPERTS. IF IT WORKS AS I ENVISION THIS WATER BATTERY WORKING, IT WOULD OPEN UP A WHOLE NEW PARADYM OF DOING BUSINESS.

Building a working Joe Cell to charge the water would be the first thin, or just have someone to build it for you. Downunder they tested this new water by take a few ounces and using a small plastic funnel, put it inside of a balloon. Next, they blew up the balloon, then took both ends of a jumper cable hooked to a battery charger, and held the connections onto the side of the balloon for approx. one minute. Next, they placed the balloon on the ground, and lit it with a long board. The balloon exploded like a hydrogen balloon. The water that spilled out onto the ground would ignite with a lighter and burn like butane having a blue flame. The water being superconductive, took on the memory of the 12 volt dc, converting the water into a burnable fuel.

A water battery employing this type of properties should cause the electron flow to become resonant causing an equal and opposite reaction. plates or cells could be used for the neutral but may not be needed. Too induse the desired charge into the water to capture the radiant energy, build the containment out of orgonite. They will make the water battery into a tranducer converting right hand sping energy into left hand spin. The neg. side can be earth grounded and the pos. side hooked into an antenal array. This would make the water battery into a type of Tesla Coil that is tuned to the higher frequencies. The water should accumilate this energy as it is able to recieve and transmit at the same time. You have a type of water capacitor that is highly active. The energy coming into the water cell would flow from one terminal to the other and into the water as this would be the point of least resistance. It should be possalbe then to connect two secondary outputs to capture the peak energies in the water. Once the water is tuned and charged, it would become your working medium. There you have it.

When this stuff comes to me Kilgore, I have to write it down or loose it. It all comes down to combining the four elements together with the fifth element being the resulting energies.

To make a receiver, you must first have a conducting medium. Then the pos. needs to been tuned to the frequency you want to attract. A Tesla Coil or pancake coil is already resonant and tuned to this higher energy. The earth complete the circuits and can be enhanced by placing a Tesla Coil in the ground. Both the water and the earth are needed along with the air from which the energy is recieved. The fire is the electron flow that is generated to capture the 5th state energy.

I would imagine brother that some of the learned engineers out there are going to get a bit ruffled from this cause it does not fit into there way of thinking. All the thinkers and inventors of the past and present think outside the conventional box of science. And most of them had working models that proved their point.

For three years now, I've been using propane to create an implosion burn inside of a metal pipe. Stainless been on the low end as being a conductor of heat, works the best and can easily be made transparent orange with very little fuel.

I've spun propane and air inside of titanium stock, and with certain materials placed within the end of the pipe, induced a sound reaction that caused the pipe to become superconductive. Have anyone seen titanium glow where who could almost read a newspaper in the dark? Or seen copper become superconductive causing the propane to sublimate into the plasma state melting the titanium? I've got the pics to prove it and if you want could even send you some of the samples that destroyed the pipe in the last test. I've sure that you would see a change on the molecular state.

I've no doubt that a simple water battery can be made that would drawn in the Tesla energies and transduce them at the same time into dc. A battery that would contiunue to run and never need charging. Some of you that have the facilities, time and resources could easily make this. But I must warn you, if your intensions are for self gain or any other alterior motive, it will not work for you. Why? Because the water will pick up on your intension. Water is affected by our intention as that Japanese doctor has proven. Our intension is the missing ingrediant to make it work.

The reason the earth is begining is going into a state of chaos and unrest, is because the intensions of the people are focused on self and not on others. The only way to survive the times ahead is to draw together with those who have the same intension. A shaking and a seperation is happening between those who have a love for self and those who have a love for others. If we draw together having the right intension, we will see results. And these results will manifest into someting tangible that will become a blessing to many. As I've already said, these water acumilator energy batteries will work to provide all the electrical energies for the home. The result would be a pure energy output with near to zero distortion. In otherwards, you could use it as the souce power to generate vortex flux. The reason that magnectic flus is stationary, is that the energy has junk in it. Get rid of the junk and the EM field will spin. Forget about having to wire your house cause you won't need it.

Got to go brother. Working on making the water at this point then can commense to put this water cell battery together. It would be easier to make the water as it has more that just one application. It's the best water purifier on earth. Now your able to grow food that will pure and healthy to eat. Just one of the many benifits.

New Water can be generated by condensing the water from Browns Gas flame. The Joe Cell is able to electrically purify large quanties of the stuff. So this would be the starting point. Got to go. Sure appreciate your reply. Blessings, Joshua.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
4
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#2

Re: Water Batteries

08/04/2008 4:05 PM

Stainless steel is one of the WORST electrode materials for water electrolysis due to the hydrogen overvoltage of iron.

Water can be changed into a burnible fuel by changing its frequency. Water into wine anyone?

This scam has been covered in great detail in previous threads. Sorry.

John Keely gave inventiveness to a higher power, so did Tesla, Stanley Meyers, Paul Pantone, Slim Spurline, and even Joe.

You do realise that some of these are scam artists don't you.

Real science and pseudoscience can be very difficult to distinguish. Have a look at what myself and other scientists and engineers have written. Basing any research and development work on an unstable base of scams and hopelessly bad science and lab work will always lead to disaster.

The combinatin of the two metals, salt water and sand using a Joe Cell format may just do something this strange and wonderful. So now we have a water battery that is connected to the energy of the earth. Anyone venture to comment on all this

Could you please provide us a link to the "Joe Cell'. Is it yet another overunity free-energy-from-salt-water device?

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 6
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Water Batteries

08/04/2008 4:41 PM

Hi Jack of All Trades

I do appreciate your comments and understand your point of view.

Much experimenting is being done on the Joe Cell. Joe himself had a NDE back in 1995, and it was after this that he intuitively put together the cell that was able to power a vehical with the gas line fully disconnected.

If you go to u tube, you will be able to see his posts first hand. Just type in Joe Cell, Joe talking, and go form there. It is worth the few hours to get it from the horses mouth.

You may want to check out 'Stan Deyo' talking about the disclosure of how to make anti-gravity as well.

For the past three years I have been experimently with creating vortex combustion that is able to convert a burnable fuel like propane into an endothermic state releasing much more of its potential energy. During this time I have witnessed many anomolies, one of which is the generation of over a million BTU. In these tests using only short copper pipes, the metal itself has intantly become transparent while ejecting a OU flame in the fourth state.

In the titanium tests, I have seen the titanium sublimate to the superconductive state of the boiling point, seen copper become superconductive and melt the titanium, and seen where a plasma arc was created within a split second that sheared the titanium pipe in half. Got the pieces to prove it. Sound or self generating frequency is the key to converting third state matter and energy into the fourth state. In the first titanium test, the pipe itself became pot-marked inside and out as a likely result of the energy transfer from within the sub space of the material. It left the test piece with a strong arcing smell. As you know, the arcing is a sign of the metal being converted into the gas state of which there is no record.

In one test using 99 percent iso, a the plama state was triggered converting the copper pipe into the supercondtive state with a high yield plasma ejection. Turning on the water vapor flush, I turned off the iso and the water continued to burn in the fourth state of matter for a full ten seconds. I'm not saying something that I did not experience firsthand.

Bill Williams who had recently duplicated the Joe Cell was approached by two MIB and told to stop all operations or see the death of himself and his family. Why would there be such opposition if it was a bunch of nonsense?

As far as my flame pipe experiments, I'm soon to put them on u tube. They may look simple but the hidden potential can be applied a thousand different ways if one has the intuitive ability to bring it forth.

Thanks for your reply, Joshua.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#28
In reply to #4

Re: Water Batteries

08/06/2008 3:52 PM

Sorry I am with Blink on this one. See my previous threads over the years regarding my personal assessments of these and similar pseudoscience devices and scams that violate numerous scientific laws.

If you have any doubts, try building one yourself. Just make sure that you know enough about real science and electrical principles to be able to make accurate measurements (zero point energy is not real by the way, and most of Joes reference material is by known pseudoscience scammers). And as Joe says, make sure you don't short the Joe cell or it won't work.

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Somewhere in the hills of Pennsylvania, I think.
Posts: 246
Good Answers: 4
#5

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 12:04 AM

Sounds like someone has baited you with a line of S--T and you swallowed it; hook, line, and sinker. Or, are you trying to bait us?

__________________
I'm somewhere between the age of thirty-something and Alzheimer's. I just can't remember where!
Register to Reply
2
Guru
Hobbies - Musician - New Member Australia - Member - Torn and breading Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Magnetic Island, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 3721
Good Answers: 74
#6

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 1:45 AM

Joshua

You seem very enthusiastic about it all. Could you not consider that these thoughts have been thought before? You do seem new to the subject so your 'overstating' should be excused. It is an interesting world out there, you are sooo right.

Now to the bi-metal reactor. When electrons flow they come from some where and will go some were. Man can harness this. It is not new. You could run a Little light for a couple of days if you keep all the parts in place. Corrosion comes to mind. The components are sacrificed so to say. They do not come for free. Ever.

How much replenishment will such a system need? I hope we all have shares in copper and aluminium mining companies because we are going to need a lot of the stuff to keep our energy requirements/addictions were they are now.

Suggesting that such "technology" could be a, or THE solution to the energy crisis is simply ignorant of the facts and disregarding all other more trust worthy solutions.

I fell off a very high horse one day and I was as enthusiastic as you about not knowing it all. The height of the horse was directly proportional to my lack of knowledge of the subject.I am not claiming this now. It is important to be very sceptical about jumping to conclusions and being guided by some false prophets and promises that will never come true. Thats what most of the "Joe's" of this world are. Prophets that have not studied the books and I am not getting into religion here. I must have been one, to know one. You'll work it out in the end.

"It is time for the masses to wake up and be freed from the matrix."

Like I said, to know the matrix you have to become the matrix. Waking up is not a problem! Having your home heated or cooled etc. is. And ........

Good luck Mate. Ky

__________________
The Twain Has Met
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#19
In reply to #6

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 5:35 PM

Wonderful answer.

I still have bruises on my elbows and knees from the last time I fell of my high horse!

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
48
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#7

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 2:07 AM

ALL THOSE WHO READ THIS POST I CHALLENGE YOU TO PUT WHAT I'VE SAID TO THE TEST. YOU'RE THE EXPERTS. IF IT WORKS AS I ENVISION THIS WATER BATTERY WORKING, IT WOULD OPEN UP A WHOLE NEW PARADYM OF DOING BUSINESS.

Hi Joshua.

I think you will find most of us a CR4 to be quite helpful to people asking questions about science and engineering. Many of us are practicing scientists and engineers and most of us consider rational thinkers who have contributed to our understanding of how things work to be our heroes: Einstein, Feynman, Newton, Watt, Joule, Langmuir, etc. etc. etc. To be honest, most of us hold people like Stanley Meyer, a convicted fraud, and others who claim to be able to run cars on water (which is the equivalent of postulating a perpetual motion machine) in very low regard. Many of us will patiently explain the science involved, but often the believers in the Keelynet kinds of things then turn belligerent and arrogant, assuming themselves to be far brighter than the likes of Einstein and other conventional scientists. They claim such idiocy as the laws of thermodynamics being outmoded, which is, of course gibberish: they are more certain today than in the past.

The real inventors and innovators of our day are the people like those who brought us the space age, microcomputers, jet airplanes, gliders and then powered flight, GPS, cell phones, the telephone, TV, real fuel cells (that combine H2 and O2 to form water... not the fuel cells that Dennis Lee fraudulently sells, which are simple electrolysis units) closed loop fuel injection systems, modern medicine, etc., etc. These are real scientists and engineers who can easily and instantly agree on many basic principles of physics, chemistry, and mechanics.

Do uneducated, arrogant frauds working in their garages, sometimes create useful things? Occasionally. Do real garage inventors, educated in the subject matter with which they are dealing, invent useful things -- of course. Do real scientists who have actually studied this stuff in phenomenal depth, and who were the smart kids in grade school, high school, college, and graduate school understand their subject matter better than the typical lay person? Of course. Imagine the incredible arrogance of anyone who would claim otherwise. (In medical terms: do you want your heart surgery performed by a butcher or a surgeon?) Many of the more belligerent scamsters who have visited CR4 treat stupidity, rudeness, and ignorance of basic science as a virtues. Most of us at CR4 do not. They call it thinking outside the box. We call it nay saying -- saying "no" to science.

For me personally, real scientists, doing real science, have served as highly-valued mentors, often giving of their time completely freely, out of simple love for advancing science and helping people to understand science. I'm sure others here have had similar experiences, and certainly all successful engineers rely very very heavily on science -- all the calculations we do are based in science. We don't like to insult our mentors, teachers, and heroes, so we lean heavily on accumulated wisdom and on experiment: show us it works under scientific scrutiny, and we will be thrilled to help get the word out: that is the nature of science and scientific journals. Nanotech is exciting stuff. HHO is not.

So, frankly we have little to no respect for charlatans, of the sort you can find at Keelynet: Perendev, Bedini, Searl and the other perpetual motion machine guys, including Dennis Lee... The HHO guys such as Brown, Joe, Klein, Stanley Meyer, and again Dennis Lee... all the hundreds of hydrogen booster (onboard electrolysis system) scamsters which pop up so fast that the FTC can't begin to keep up with shutting them down. We also don't have a lot of patience with companies which scam inventors, such as Davison*. In short, I'd have to say that few of us are big on scams and arrogance: we take science seriously and don't like to see pseudoscience paraded around as if it is science. None of us works to "suppress" technology, and many of us share brand new technology with others just for the joy of doing so. You will not find many conspiracy theorists here: Stanley Meyer was convicted of fraud because he was a fraud. Dennis Lee was convicted of fraud because he was a fraud. Searl went to jail because he was stealing from the electric company. Searl's inverse gravity machines have been observed flying into space only in Searl's imagination. There is no "suppression," no "conspiracy," just simple crime prosecution. Crooks get caught -- just not often enough.

So if you are interested in science, you've found the right place. However, it seems that such is not the case, because so little of what you say has a basis in science. If instead, you are interested in pseudoscience, I'd recommend Keelynet. Many of Dennis Lee's sites are also entertaining. Jpseph Newman is an absolute hoot, if you haven't seen him already. Most of the material on Peswiki is also pseudoscience, so you may find that sight interesting. Searl has his own site, which is incredibly funny for people with any background in science, but is taken seriously by many pseudoscientists. If you search for "free energy" you will find loads of sites you would probably enjoy more than CR4.

I can virtually guarantee that no one here who is a scientist or engineer will take you up on your challenge, because so little of what you have said is supportable by science. But don't let that discourage you. Most of the people here are actively engaged in engineering and science, so unscientific baloney does not sell well here. But your concepts could sell well, perhaps very well, at some of the pseudoscience sites. There are, for instance, hundreds of people all over the world doing "replications" of "magnet motors" which engineers and scientists consider patently idiotic. Not one has actually worked yet, but many people have imagined them to work... and for many people that's enough. Offer your challenge on some of those sites and you may get some takers. Here, you might just as well be writing in Martian -- little you say makes sense to many of us, but that's only because we are accustomed to speaking in the language of science. On other sites, you might be viewed as a Messiah. To be good science fiction your stuff needs work, but that may be another avenue to consider. However, you might want to anchor some of your conjecture to real science -- if it is too far out there, people won't be engaged. Maybe try for a little more human interest, too. The best science fiction is really about people.

Free energy, over unity, Brown's gas having properties other than ordinary H2 and O2, HHO (meaning "atomic" hydrogen and oxygen, rather than the real constituents of oxyhydrogen gas), fuel line magnets, crystals used for heeling purposes, antigravity machines, etc, etc. These are all things better supported at other sites.

Here, we deal in science, and view the promoters of such drivel as falling into four classes: 1. aggressive frauds, 2. people profoundly ignorant of the central principals of science, 3. jokers or 4. insane.

People in the first and fourth class we cannot help. People in the second class can simply read a good physics text, a good chemistry text, a brief text on thermodynamics, and (for the automotive scams) a text on combustion engineering. Then come back with questions that have a basis in science. No PhD is needed. Alternatively, seek out the other sites where, because you have thrown in a couple big words and inappropriately applied jargon, you will very likely be viewed as a hero. If you are in the third class, in other words if you are writing all this tongue-in-cheek, then I think it needs a little work too -- but please don't be offended, that's just my opinion. Others may find it really funny. It just seems to me that we've had so many posts like yours that they just don't get a laugh anymore.

And remember that all are welcome here, unless, of course, you are a true fraud.

* the most recent settlement against Davison is for $26,000,000 but they keep going, bilking inventors. There is big, big money in fraud.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 48)
Guru
Canada - Member - Toronto, Ontario (South Parkdale On The Lakeshore) Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - Great Lakes School Of Marine Technology (Owen Sound and Port Colbourne) Technical Fields - Architecture - Private Practice 1976-1990 Technical Fields - Education - Toronto Teachers' College 1971 Technical Fields - Marketing/Advertising - Founding Member Hobbies - Hunting - Founding Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - Founding Member

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 1265
Good Answers: 14
#24
In reply to #7

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/06/2008 1:03 AM

Hi, Blink!

My goodness gracious!!! Won't you just listen to YOU???

GA#13 for luck.

Mark

Register to Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Engineering Fields - Transportation Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Technical Fields - Procurement - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Architectural Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Marketing/Advertising - New Member Engineering Fields - Food Process Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mariposa Ca
Posts: 5800
Good Answers: 114
#26
In reply to #7

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/06/2008 2:44 PM

Thanks for the wonderful reply/explanation.

I can virtually guarantee that no one here who is a scientist or engineer will take you up on your challenge, because so little of what you have said is supportable by science. But don't let that discourage you.

Recently on another thread I went round & round try to explain some good basic tests that could be proformed to verify the wild claims of a Browns gas generator supporter.

I liken them to alcoholics!

They don't have a problem & for damm sure don't want help with the problem they don't recognize.

Thanks for taking you valuable time to post

P.S. Does anyone know what is the highest GA talley on this site.

& hows the 800 MPG 3 wheeler coming? [inside joke]

Register to Reply
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#27
In reply to #7

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/06/2008 3:42 PM

Nicely put. An extended compilation version of what I have said over the years here.

GA for you.

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Israel
Posts: 2968
Good Answers: 24
#29
In reply to #7

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/07/2008 10:30 AM

"...There is big, big money in fraud..." - And they never run out of suckers, for some mysterious reason. Is it to keep the current level of entropy neck-high?

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale Florida
Posts: 5708
Good Answers: 123
#35
In reply to #7

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/10/2008 2:10 PM

It ain't like you need my 2 cents worth, but that was the most polite way of rebuffing someone I ever heard. Wonderful writing.

__________________
Bob
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 6
#36
In reply to #35

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/10/2008 6:16 PM

Greetings All

I don't mind getting politely rebuffed. However, if you go to <magnetpowerinc.com> and listen to the radio podcast, you may find yourselves being rebuffed. Just being polite here. Be blessed, Joshua.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 328
Good Answers: 29
#38
In reply to #36

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/11/2008 5:59 PM

Manchild,

Did you mean www.magneticpowerinc.com?

A quick look at this site is all it takes - mentions of "quantum vacuum" as an energy source, and "zero point energy" are a dead giveaway.

Pseudoscience, pure and simple, else known as male bovine fecal material.

__________________
paulusgnome
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Education - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Posts: 576
Good Answers: 13
#39
In reply to #38

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/12/2008 6:34 PM

Wikipedia: Zero-point Energy

"In quantum field theory, it is a synonym for the vacuum energy, an amount of energy associated with the vacuum of empty space. In cosmology, the vacuum energy is taken to be the origin of the cosmological constant which is thought by many to produce dark energy. Experimentally, the zero-point energy of the vacuum leads directly to the Casimir effect, and is directly observable in nanoscale devices."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-point_energy

---

Wikipedia: Vacuum Energy

"Its effects can be observed in various phenomena (such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the Van-Der Waals bonds, the Lamb shift), and it is thought to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe on cosmological scales."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy

---

Wikipedia: Casimir effect

"The Casimir effect was measured more accurately in 1997 by Steve K. Lamoreaux of Los Alamos National Laboratory [12] and by Umar Mohideen and Anushree Roy of the University of California at Riverside [13]. In practice, rather than using two parallel plates, which would require phenomenally accurate alignment to ensure they were parallel, the experiments use one plate that is flat and another plate that is a part of a sphere with a large radius. In 2001, a group at the University of Padua finally succeeded in measuring the Casimir force between parallel plates using microresonators[14]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect

__________________
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 6)
Power-User
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Posts: 328
Good Answers: 29
#40
In reply to #39

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/12/2008 8:26 PM

It is very easy to selectively quote something in such a way as to give the impression that something is said which is quite contrary to the original intention of the author. Such is the case here.

At the risk of also selectively quoting from the uber-reliable Wikipedia,

From the article on Zero-Point Energy :

"The Casimir effect has established zero point energy as an uncontroversial and scientifically accepted phenomenon. The concept of zero point energy has also become associated with pseudoscience, particularly the design and invention of "free energy" devices, which are essentially perpetual motion machines."

And from the article on Vacuum Energy :

"The existence of vacuum energy is also sometimes used, outside of mainstream physics, as controversial theoretical justification for the possibility of free energy machines. It has been argued that due to the broken symmetry (in QED), free energy does not violate conservation of energy, since the laws of thermodynamics only apply to equilibrium systems. However, consensus among particle physicists is that this is incorrect and that vacuum energy cannot be harnessed to do usable work. In particular, the second law of thermodynamics is unaffected by the existence of vacuum energy."

__________________
paulusgnome
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Education - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Posts: 576
Good Answers: 13
#41
In reply to #40

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/15/2008 10:06 PM

Note that I did not interpret the wiki excerpts. Interesting that you assumed I posted this information in support of the obviously dubious "water battery" web site. On the contrary, I agree that no one has (as far as we know) figured out a way to tap the zero-point energy/vacuum energy. Maybe no one will ever succeed. The point of those excerpts was to point out that *mainstream science considers the ZPE to be a real phenomenon*. So we shouldn't automatically reject a claim simply for mentioning such terms. We should reject claims if tests fail to provide supporting empirical evidence. The scientific method relies on empiricism, not guilt-by-association.

__________________
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -- Piet Hein
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#37
In reply to #35

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/10/2008 7:07 PM

Thanks, Bob. I'm glad so many people have appreciated the post. I spent a little longer than I would on the typical post, figuring I could reuse it by linking to it as the need arises... if the past is any indication, the need could arise often.

In my Explorer Favorites list I have an entry for "Hydrogen Production (real)." Odd there would need to be the qualifier, but its reason for being can be seen by Googling "making hydrogen." Two of the three highlighted links at the top are scams. Every one of the eight sponsored links along the right are scams. Surprisingly, only one of the "ordinary" links gives instructions for an automotive HHO generator, while the others appear to be legitimate electrolysis demos, etc.

So many people want to believe in free lunches.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: City of Light
Posts: 3943
Good Answers: 183
#43
In reply to #7

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/23/2008 7:18 AM

Congratulations ! Although you did not have the time to make it shorter () I HIGHLY appreciate your comments. As you know I am on same side as you and got several comments which were at the limit of insulting or even beyond because I claimed that such discussions are not for cr4 but for other places where people want to discuss nonsense and appreciate their TOTALLY unsustainable ideas.

I am glad that the critical eye of engineers is present at cr4 !

I gave you a GA and think you deserve much more.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#44
In reply to #43

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/23/2008 5:45 PM

Thanks!

There is a remarkably strong anti-science contingent in the US and elsewhere, and similar non-analytical, non-critical thinking extends into many issues even well outside the typical realms of science and engineering. I'd like to think that if enough of us speak up, we can change the course of the river a little.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: City of Light
Posts: 3943
Good Answers: 183
#45
In reply to #44

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/24/2008 7:21 AM

I am not so optimistic as you because there is a lack of knowledge and where is no knowledge it is very easy to make people believe in the most unbelievable things, people accept every thing if they do not have a reference and this is only present when knowledge is available.

It is dramatic that many of them are not stupid, they have been successful in their activities and because of that believe to be able to break the laws.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Next to the Prime Merridian (51°29'34.50"N 0°13'32.85"W)
Posts: 780
Good Answers: 1
#46
In reply to #7

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

07/16/2009 4:11 AM

did you collect all these in a day?

__________________
Making mistake is part of learning.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#47
In reply to #46

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

07/17/2009 1:02 AM

I notice from one post that the first 13 or so were in one day. It seems that is was a couple weeks later when I came back to the thread and saw the number around 28 or so. Since then, it has gone up and down a couple either side of 30.

It proves this theory: Put enough monkeys in a room with typewriters, and they will eventually type the works of Shakespeare. If you just make a post long enough, there's bound to be something in it the people like.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#8

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 5:34 AM

Whatever halucigen it is that you are smoking, drinking or ingesting, I strongly recommend that you stop immediately. It's having a really bad effect.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Gone to Alabama with my banjo on my knee...
Posts: 5595
Good Answers: 20
#9

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 7:06 AM

Ken, well thought, and well put. Gentle and genteel all at once - I commend you! Not one single reference to snake oil, however, which personally, I prefer, as it lubricates without staining. But for the overall effectiveness of your reply, I not only voted you a GA, but award you (for ONLY the second time to anyone):

__________________
Veni, vidi, video - I came, I saw, I got it on film.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#18
In reply to #9

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 5:32 PM

Thanks for the very kind words, and especially the star. I saved it to my hard drive and will take it out to look at it on special occasions.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Power-User
Canada - Member -

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Good Answers: 4
#10

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 7:28 AM

Ken,

And yet another GA for you, kind sir. Well done.

__________________
Handle every stressful situation like a dog. If you can't eat it or play with it, just pee on it and walk away. - unknown.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#21
In reply to #10

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 5:44 PM

Thanks very much. Feedback like yours helps keep me sane... or close.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: "Springwood", North Tamborine Mountain. Qld. OZ.
Posts: 837
Good Answers: 28
#11

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 8:51 AM

Hey! EM.

Not only do I commend Ken, and fully support his views, but like your thinking too.

Excellent response to Ken's post. I am a passionate supporter of those who will give credit where it's due, and for that, from me, you too get a GA.

First Class!

Cheers,

Stu.

__________________
"Nothing, is as it seems." Dr Wally.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#22
In reply to #11

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 5:58 PM

Thanks, Stu.

I value EM's posts (here and elsewhere), and yours (here and elsewhere) (but only because you both had the good sense to give me GA's.)

Actually, we have a pretty incredible group of people here, who not only know loads about how "stuff" works, but also a lot about how people work. This is a great site to learn not just about F=MA, but also about the value of humor, kindness, and generosity.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Power-User
Canada - Member - BC Born, Alberta Raised, Quebec (poutine) crazed... Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - An airplane is just a bunch of beams... Hobbies - Model Rocketry - Had fun as a kid...fun stuff Hobbies - CNC - dreaming of cutting Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - PID ME!

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal, CANADA
Posts: 368
Good Answers: 10
#12

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 8:54 AM

"The height of the horse was directly proportional to my lack of knowledge of the subject." ROFL! I think we all fall off at some turning point where naive enthusiasm becomes realism. Nothing wrong with getting back on the horse...just do it properly and once you know how to ride!

__________________
kkjensen
Register to Reply
Power-User
Canada - Member - BC Born, Alberta Raised, Quebec (poutine) crazed... Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - An airplane is just a bunch of beams... Hobbies - Model Rocketry - Had fun as a kid...fun stuff Hobbies - CNC - dreaming of cutting Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - PID ME!

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal, CANADA
Posts: 368
Good Answers: 10
#13

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 9:05 AM

A big thanks and GA to Ken for taking the time to reply to a big question with a big answer...it couldn't have been done clearer or more tactfully.

__________________
kkjensen
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 246
#23
In reply to #13

Re: Water Batteries-Joshua Reply

08/05/2008 6:04 PM

Many thanks. It was a rather long answer, and when my answers get long, I am always reminded of a Mark Twain quote: "Sorry for the long letter. If I had more time I could have made it shorter."

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - Popular Science - Paleontology - New Member

Join Date: May 2008
Location: Holeincanoe Ontario
Posts: 2169
Good Answers: 27
#14

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 9:59 AM

When Ray Davis started his original solar neutrino experiment, he bought
several thousand gallons of cleaning fluid to fill the detector. I've been
told that shortly afterwards, he was overwhelmed by sales people wanting to
sell him vast quantities of coat hangers.

So it is with frauds and charlatans....

__________________
Prophet Freddy has the answer!
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#15

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 10:22 AM

good idea?. i have no idea about the process potential, but you are 100% correct, inventiveness comes form a higher power...HE communicates HIS ideas through us and some act on it, some don't, some don't have the resources, some do...as far as your theory, i encourage you to contact as many research engineers in that field as you can an don't take the first or second "no" for an answer...

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 749
Good Answers: 13
#16

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 2:57 PM

Really manchild?

"Water can be changed into a burnible fuel by changing its frequency."

What does that mean? What is the "frequency" of water and how do you change it?

What is the state of water induced by "changing its frequency" that makes it a "burnible fuel."

What are your references for these assertions?

j.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 749
Good Answers: 13
#17

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 3:35 PM

Manchild,

Nobody on this site, I would venture, appreciates your sentiment for freeing the masses more than I do.

But when it comes to your having a high school diploma I would revoke the diplomas of all the school officials, teachers, etc., that allow people with your eclectic view of all things, let alone science, to acquire a diploma because in the first place your total lack of any coherent material relationships between things leaves me aghast. And when I talk of allowing you to get a diploma I really mean failing to educate you so that the diploma represents that they have adequately taught you about the real world and how we think about it.

For instance, "sand was added to the electrolyte and may be responsible for developing a 'combination effect.'" Pray tell what is that combination effect?

Later you talk of that "sand as the physical separator." Pray tell what is it that sand is separating and what is it effecting and how is it doing that?

Back EMF is just that, the reversed electromotive force (Now clearly understood as the reversed movement of electrons). Back EMF speaks purely of electron movement, why and where do you think that gives you grounds for hypothesizing, without any data, that "something this strange and wonderful" can be equated to back EMF.

If I am being difficult, I am doing it not out of personal animosity although the sort of thinking you produce here certainly pisses me off. I am doing it because you demonstrate in a most egregious fashion, the inability of other folks like you to see any rational coherent order to the natural world and especially to the way we think about it.

Are you aware that in the last four or five hundred years we have worked out the actual relationships, each in their proper category, of actual things, of actual phenomena.

Are you aware that great work was not the result of notions, ideas emanating from mind, without in fact being the result of hard work and application to real things, not ephemera.

Now instead of being pissed off respond. How do you see what is being said about your meaningless contribution here, meaningless in the sense that the things you say are clearly stuff cooked up in your mind, with good intentions no doubt, but nonetheless with no connection to what I hope most of us see as the concrete rational world rather than mindless notion?

j.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 501
Good Answers: 8
#20

Re: Water Batteries

08/05/2008 5:35 PM

Sand? What kind of sand?

Quartz, granite, sand from coral?

Nothing magic there.

I made salt water batteries when I was a kid more than fifty years ago. Used all kinds of materials - none lasted long and you could not get much current either. Used acids too that worked better.

Heck - you can take a penny and a dime - stick them on your tongue and make a battery. How do you think they get the bulb to light when they screw it into their mouth?

But have some fun - there is plenty salt and plenty water, plenty sand too.

I would not use aluminum it oxidises too quickly and there goes your power.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - Charter Member Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Charter Member

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Posts: 1946
Good Answers: 73
#25

Re: Water Batteries

08/06/2008 7:57 AM

Excellent Ken, I-2 w/GA.

manchild post could be hoax.

Someone would have to be pulling our collective leg here.

__________________
I go into every human encounter expecting to be framed for a crime I didn't commit. Dilbert, 2013
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver (not BC) Washington (not DC) US of A
Posts: 1261
Good Answers: 12
#30

Re: Water Batteries

08/07/2008 1:02 PM

I just read an article on Global Spec about a hand made photo-voltaic device which uses cuprous oxide, copper, and salt water. It actually works

BUT

each cell produces .25 volts at 33 uAmps... or .00000825 watts. With this much power you could do... absolutely nothing. The chemistry simply is not there, and there is nothing anyone can do to change it.

I think I will opt for the hot tub sized nuclear reactor to go in my back yard (another item on the same Global Spec). It at least puts out enough power to be practical...

and I could power the BIGGEST Christmas display in the entire neighborhood!!

Sincerely

Bill

Register to Reply
Power-User
Canada - Member -

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 435
Good Answers: 4
#31
In reply to #30

Re: Water Batteries

08/07/2008 1:12 PM

I hope you got deep pockets, though...."We are currently projecting a consumer cost of about $25 million for the module,"

__________________
Handle every stressful situation like a dog. If you can't eat it or play with it, just pee on it and walk away. - unknown.
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 21
#32

Re: Water Batteries

08/09/2008 10:29 PM

HI THERE

i have used water battery in a small scale and they do work at the moment useing one to power a clock an just about anything containing suger or salt it will work on think for mine used two strips of zinc and two of copper and run two wires between the two then from the connection points on the battery connection to two wires that connects to a small radio or clock havent did much more work then that

__________________
im here if you wan't something done right
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 6
#33
In reply to #32

Re: Water Batteries

08/10/2008 12:05 AM

Hi Canderous

Heard that scientests in Russia have perfected super deionized water, and have heard of a company that has invested millions of dollars into pumping out 2oo thousands gallons a days of super ionized water having an extra three electrons. The water is highly conductive. Anyone got any comments concerning this. From what I can remember, they spent upward of 36 million to develop the plant. Imagine using this super ionized water to make a highly efficient water battery. The neg. charged ions become the electolyte.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Anonymous Poster
#34
In reply to #33

Re: Water Batteries

08/10/2008 12:41 PM

How bout a link or any kind of background?

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Anonymous Poster
#42
In reply to #33

Re: Water Batteries

08/22/2008 12:12 PM

Sorry to spoil your fun kiddo, but deionized water is simply water with negligible dissolved minerals. It would be the worst possible electrolyte to use for a battery because ultrapure water does not conduct electricity. And why spend millions of dollars to make water conduct electricity well when you can get it for free? Just scoop up a bucket of seawater. The high dissolved salt content within makes it a good conductor.

And as for the notion of putting disimilar metals into an electrolyte to generate electricity, of course it works. It's the principle of the voltaic cell, but it'll work for only a couple of minutes before it dies off. Reason? Because the terminals will corrode, unless you keep wiping them clean to expose a fresh conductive surface. And no, changing the frequency of water (whatever that means) will not cause it to burn. A tiny amount of water heated to a very high temperature will, because thermolysis breaks it down to H2 & O2, but what's the point of using vast amounts of energy to burn water when there are far more efficient fuels to burn?

By the way, there are ways to extract H2 from water apart from the workable but highly inefficient process of electrolysis, and there is a way to turn water into a flammable fuel. I won't say what they are though, because those of us who bothered to pay attention in school during Chemistry class will know what they are. Besides, they can be pretty dangerous processes, particularly for anyone who doesn't know what they're doing. If you're really interested to know more, go dig up you old high school Chemistry text book. And as for all you "water-for-gas" scammers & allied nutcases out there (c'mon, you know who you are), well, keep guessing, because I'm not going to help you scam people with what I say.

Ciao dude.

Anakin Skywalker out.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 135
Good Answers: 6
#48
In reply to #33

Re: Water Batteries

11/01/2009 6:19 AM

How much energy is used in the production of the "super deionized" water?

__________________
If you want to know what God thinks of money, just look at the people he gave it to. - Dorothy Parker
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Register to Reply 48 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (3); Blink (9); bob c (1); Bricktop (1); canderous ordo (1); d_m_rosenberg (1); Duckinthepond (1); EnviroMan (1); FKIA (1); Garthh (1); Isti80 (1); Jack Jersawitz (2); jack of all trades (3); jmart23 (1); Kilgore Trout (1); kkjensen (2); ky (1); manchild02 (4); MarkTheHandyman (1); nick name (2); Paulusgnome (2); Rick@cae (2); Sciesis2 (1); Stueywright (1); svengali (2); Yuval (1)

Previous in Forum: Solar Pannels   Next in Forum: Português
You might be interested in: Battery Holders, Battery and Fuel Cell Components

Advertisement