Hi friends,
I believe, based on my observations in practise over many years, the tuned behaviour of flow -control loops which have the control valve placed after the flow-meter is very good. Since liquids are incompressible, the lag or delay in sensing of flow is negligible and the integral time-constant (Ti) is small. This results in a very stable loop which can adapt rapidly to changes in set-point. Such changes in set-point are usually dictated by cascades as well.
However, placing the flow-meter downstream to the control-valve creates a certain delay in sensing of changes in the flow, caused by the valve's controlling action. Again, a related source of trouble is the possibility that down-stream of the valve, the line may not be completely filled.
All the same, this belief of mine was challenged recently, when we used a rotameter type flow-meter. Valve movement caused movements of the rotameter float, which compounded the oscillations in the valve, making it impossible to tune! I regained some control by placing the CV downstream and used a Lag-filter of some 25-30 seconds time constant to get stable flow measurements. But the control was very sluggish.
Thus I raise this question, which is better ?? FM before or after CV?? or does it depend on the flow-meter?
I wish to hear from people who've been through similar situations, about their experiences
17 minutes ago
Good Answers:
"Almost" Good Answers: