Previous in Forum: Active Instruments and Passive Instruments   Next in Forum: P&ID instrument Abbreviations
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8

In Closed-loop Flow Control, What is Better? FM Before CV or CV Before FM

11/22/2011 2:22 AM

Hi friends,

I believe, based on my observations in practise over many years, the tuned behaviour of flow -control loops which have the control valve placed after the flow-meter is very good. Since liquids are incompressible, the lag or delay in sensing of flow is negligible and the integral time-constant (Ti) is small. This results in a very stable loop which can adapt rapidly to changes in set-point. Such changes in set-point are usually dictated by cascades as well.

However, placing the flow-meter downstream to the control-valve creates a certain delay in sensing of changes in the flow, caused by the valve's controlling action. Again, a related source of trouble is the possibility that down-stream of the valve, the line may not be completely filled.

All the same, this belief of mine was challenged recently, when we used a rotameter type flow-meter. Valve movement caused movements of the rotameter float, which compounded the oscillations in the valve, making it impossible to tune! I regained some control by placing the CV downstream and used a Lag-filter of some 25-30 seconds time constant to get stable flow measurements. But the control was very sluggish.

Thus I raise this question, which is better ?? FM before or after CV?? or does it depend on the flow-meter?

I wish to hear from people who've been through similar situations, about their experiences

17 minutes ago

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Popular Science - Biology - New Member Hobbies - Musician - New Member APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - New Member Hobbies - CNC - New Member Fans of Old Computers - ZX-81 - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Centurion, South Africa
Posts: 3921
Good Answers: 97
#1

Re: In closed-loop flow control, what is better?? FM before CV or CV before FM

11/22/2011 2:36 AM

Flow meters are affected by turbulence caused by valves , fittings or obstructions.

What is the distance between your CV and FM?

__________________
Never do today what you can put of until tomorrow - Student motto
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 8
#2
In reply to #1

Re: In closed-loop flow control, what is better?? FM before CV or CV before FM

11/22/2011 2:43 AM

Typically 3-4 metres. basically bends for vertical FM orientation & straight runs.

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#3

Re: In closed-loop flow control, what is better?? FM before CV or CV before FM

11/22/2011 3:16 AM

As liquids are practically incompressible it shouldn't matter. However, flowmeters generally do need to be placed in low-turbulence zones and following their manufacturer's installation instructions.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Technical Fields - Education - New Member Fans of Old Computers - Apple II -

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 191
Good Answers: 46
#6
In reply to #3

Re: In closed-loop flow control, what is better?? FM before CV or CV before FM

11/22/2011 8:06 AM

PWSlack is right-on: assuming an incompressible fluid, with completely filled pipes both upstream and downstream of the control valve, there should be no difference in lag time for the flowmeter's response to valve positioning. A change in valve position should cause a corresponding change in flow throughout the piping system. The only real lag time for an enclosed liquid is the speed of sound through that liquid.

However, control valves are some of the worst offenders for creating the kinds of large-scale turbulence (swirl, eddies) that tend to mess up flowmeter accuracy. For this reason alone, it is inadvisable to place a flowmeter downstream of the valve unless it is a type of flowmeter that is unaffected by flow profile (e.g. Coriolis, positive displacement).

__________________
They call me "lightning" when wielding a hammer, because I never strike twice in the same place
Register to Reply
2
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#4

Re: In closed-loop flow control, what is better?? FM before CV or CV before FM

11/22/2011 3:26 AM

FM→CV.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Near the New Madrid Fault. USA
Posts: 269
Good Answers: 1
#11
In reply to #4

Re: In closed-loop flow control, what is better?? FM before CV or CV before FM

11/23/2011 12:17 PM

Right you are and stay away (5 pipe dia.I think) from 90's.

__________________
It's not Rocket Science
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#5

Re: In Closed-loop Flow Control, What is Better? FM Before CV or CV Before FM

11/22/2011 7:59 AM

I agree with Tornado.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - USA! Hobbies - Musician - Sound Man Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - More than a Hobby Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: City of Roses.
Posts: 2056
Good Answers: 101
#7

Re: In Closed-loop Flow Control, What is Better? FM Before CV or CV Before FM

11/22/2011 11:48 AM

Agree with Tornado's simple and effective answer.

One thing that many people fail to realize about flow meters (it's usually printed in the Manufacturers literature), is that a certain length of straight unobstructed pipe/tube must be installed before the flowmeter to calm down any turbulent flow into semi-laminar flow before any accurate reading can be taken. Sometimes it is recommended to have a flow straightener before the meter if turbulent flow is present.

It's early... Where is my coffee?

__________________
Don't believe everything you read on the Internet!
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: texas
Posts: 92
Good Answers: 8
#8

Re: In Closed-loop Flow Control, What is Better? FM Before CV or CV Before FM

11/22/2011 1:11 PM

Hi,

Turbulance is a big factor when meassuring flow. Flow needs to be as laminar as possible.

Flow elements need to be installed upstream of the final elements, the distances upstream and downstream of the flow element away from pipefittings or any other restrictions vary depending on the type of flow elements being used.

For example restriction type flow elements require greater distances compared to mag meters.

Thank you

__________________
"The older I get -The better I was"
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 143
Good Answers: 24
#9

Re: In Closed-loop Flow Control, What is Better? FM Before CV or CV Before FM

11/22/2011 11:34 PM

I agree with almost all the posts, but feel some clarification is needed.

There are many different types of flow meters that operate via different principles, paddle wheel, Magflo, Vortx, or the simple oriface etc

For the specific style of meter you have, you need to understand the working principle, then design your system around that principle. In general manufacturers will give you the information you need to adhere to. Follow these instructions accurately.

As others have said, in general the flowmeters need stable flow for a certain lengths upstream and downstream. Note stable flow, not Laminar flow. For example MagFlo typical rule of thumb is straight lengths of pipe for 5 pipe diameters upstream, and 10 pipe diameters downstream. No valves, T's, elbows, or any other flow interuption within this space (including chemical dosing). And MagFlo's are typically accurate over 0.1 - 10 m/s velocity - and 10 m/s is well into turbulent flow (not laminar).

Note: this rule of thumb should be checked against the manufacturers recomendations.

Where I disagree with most of the posts is, I don't believe there is any significant difference in tuning the control loop between the control valve and flow meter wether it is placed upstream of downstream of the CV. Water doesn't compress, so the flowrate change is virtually instantaneous, therefore it shouldn't matter. If the distance between FM and Cv was large, then stressing/flexing of the pipeline may cause a lag in the control.

There is one other consideration that in reality will be a very significant driver for this decision. If the pressure loss over the valve is large, positioning the FM downstream of the CV will advantagous for pressure rating of this instrument (ie the cost of a lower pressure instrument vs a higher pressure rated instrument can be very significant).

My 10 cents.

Anthony

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Tulsa, OK
Posts: 184
Good Answers: 2
#10

Re: In Closed-loop Flow Control, What is Better? FM Before CV or CV Before FM

11/23/2011 11:40 AM

Generally the Flow Meter is installed upstream of the control valve so that fluctuations of the flow due to valve control action do not give a false reading.

Also upstream if the upstream and downstream sizes are maintained then the flow recovery is good enough that the flow element is not affected.

Any instrument donstream of a valve will be signalling the pressure and flow drop caused by the control valve.

So unless something very specific and special is needed then always place the flow meter upstream of the control valve.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Register to Reply 11 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

ajwinemaker (1); Hendrik (1); lyn (1); PWSlack (1); rajsiyer (1); Rockyscience (1); RVZ717 (1); tonykuphaldt (1); Tornado (1); vargaalex (1); wrenchpuller (1)

Previous in Forum: Active Instruments and Passive Instruments   Next in Forum: P&ID instrument Abbreviations

Advertisement