Login | Register

"On This Day" In Engineering History

Tune in to find out about significant engineering events that took place "on this day".

The blog image is "Gestural Engineering, MIT Museum, Cambridge, MA", by pianoforte.

November 13, 1927 – The Holland Tunnel Opens

Posted November 13, 2009 4:22 PM by Moose

On this day in engineering history, the first of 51,694 vehicles drove through the Holland Tunnel, a dual-tube structure that passes beneath the Hudson River to connect the island of Manhattan with New Jersey.

Named after Clifford Milburn Holland, the project's first Chief Engineer, the Holland Tunnel consists of a north tube that measures 8,558 ft. and a south tube that is 180 ft. shorter. Some 500 ft. longer than New York's Lincoln Tunnel, the Holland Tunnel also features 700,000 more ceiling tiles for a total of 4 million.

Construction Begins

Construction on the Holland Tunnel began in 1920, seven years after a joint New York-New Jersey transportation commission recommended the building of a tunnel instead of a bridge. After rejecting several proposals for a bi-level structure, the coalition decided upon a twin tube design by Clifford Holland, a Harvard-educated engineer who, in the words of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, "sees in a tunnel all the allurement which a mole finds in a nicely constructed burrow". Holland's two-duct design called for one duct to draw-in clean air and the other to exhaust dirty air. Air movement would be controlled by 42 blowing fans and 42 exhaust fans in four ventilation buildings.

Cast Iron and Concrete

On a good day, teams of construction workers called "sandhogs" advanced 40 ft. Their progress followed the movement of two massive, hydraulically-powered, cast iron shields. Each shield weighed 400 tons and had a forward thrust of 6,000 tons. As the sandhogs advanced behind their 16-ft. long shields, they shoveled away mud and blasted through rock. The construction crews also bolted together iron rings – some 115,000 tons in all – and poured 130,000 cubic yards of concrete to form the lining of the Holland Tunnel.

The Sandhogs Succeed

Early in 1927, two brothers met beneath the Hudson River when the teams of sandhogs that they commanded finally "holed through". Later that year, when the Holland Tunnel was finally complete, President Calvin Coolidge traveled to Manhattan to press a golden lever that parted American flags on both sides of the tunnel – allowing vehicles to pass at one minute past midnight. Absent from the festivities were Clifford Milburn Holland, who had died during surgery in 1924, and 14 sandhogs who had given their lives to build this engineering marvel.

Resources:

http://www.nytimes.com/1994/06/27/nyregion/a-tunnel-holland-named-us-historic-landmark.html

http://www.nycroads.com/crossings/holland/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clifford_Milburn_Holland

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holland_Tunnel

4 comments; last comment on 11/16/2009
View/add comments

November 6, 1944 – Plutonium Production Begins

Posted November 06, 2009 12:01 AM by Moose

On this day in engineering history, the Hanford Atomic Facility first produced weapons-grade plutonium for the Manhattan Project, a top-secret effort to produce an atomic bomb for Allied use during World War II.

Established in 1943 near Hanford, Washington, the Hanford site housed the world's first first-scale plutonium production reactor. Built by Dupont and based upon designs by physicist Enrico Fermi, the B Reactor produced plutonium-239 by irradiating uranium-238 with neutrons.

Fissile plutonium material from Hanford was used first at the Trinity test site in the New Mexico desert, and then in the Fat Man bomb that an American B-29 bomber dropped over Nagasaki, Japan.

What is Plutonium?

Plutonium, a silver-gray radioactive metal with six allotropic forms, occurs naturally but only in minute quantities. Like neptunium, another transuranium element, plutonium is produced by the radioactive decay of uranium, a very dense and radioactive metallic element present in rocks and soil and more common than gold, silver, or mercury.

In 1940, researchers at the University of California, Berkeley bombarded uranium with neutrons from a cyclotron to artificially produce first neptunium and then plutonium. The discovery of these and other transuranium elements by the Manhattan Project scientists remained highly-classified throughout World War II.

Plutonium Applications

Plutonium is used both as an explosive agent in nuclear weapons and in civilian applications for nuclear power. According to Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), a former Manhattan Project site that is now part of the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE), one kilogram (kg) of plutonium yields approximately 22-million kilowatt hours (kWh) of heat energy. With regard to military applications, the complete detonation of a kilogram of plutonium is equivalent to some 20,000-tons of chemical explosive.

After the Hanford Atomic Facility began plutonium production on November 6, 1944, the spent fuel was reprocessed on-site. The Hanford B Canyon, the world's first large-scale reprocessing plant, used remote-controlled equipment to chop the spent fuel into pieces. After the pieces were dissolved in nitric acid, a corrosive and highly-radioactive acid solution chemically extracted the weapons-grade plutonium. During the Cold War, this gravity-fed chemical factory became one of eight such American reprocessing facilities for separating plutonium from spent reactor-fuel.

Resources:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site

http://periodic.lanl.gov/elements/94.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plutonium#Production_during_the_Manhattan_Project

http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/atomic+number+94

http://www.hss.energy.gov/healthsafety/ohre/roadmap/achre/intro_9_3.html

http://www.uraniumsa.org/about/what_is_uranium.htm

5 comments; last comment on 11/08/2009
View/add comments

October 21, 1966 – The Aberfan Disaster

Posted October 21, 2009 12:00 AM by Moose

On this day in engineering history, a mass of mining debris claimed the lives of 144 people in Aberfan, a Welsh village near Merthyr Tydfil. After several days of heavy rains, land subsided at Colliery Waste Tip No. 7, one of the large piles of loose rock and mining slag that Britain's National Coal Board (NCB) had deposited above Aberfan on the side of Merthyr Mountain. The resulting landslide was so loud that some villagers thought a jet was about to crash. But the "horrible nightmare" that eight-year old Gaynor Minett witnessed was far worse.

A Long Time Coming

For nearly 50 years, excavated mining debris from the Methryl Vale Colliery had been dumped above the village of Aberfan, Wales. Arranged in piles or "tips", the mining waste was layered above highly-porous sandstone that contained underground springs. Although Aberfan authorities had long worried about the possibility of a landslide near the village school, NBC officials remained indifferent. Local mining managers denied that the ground near Colliery Waste Tip No. 7 contained a spring, and the NCB itself remained without a tipping policy.

On the morning of October 21, 1966, more than 150,000 cubic meters of water-logged waste slid down Merthyr Mountain at a high rate of speed. Although a majority of the mass was deposited on the lower slopes, some 40,000 cubic meters buried parts of Aberfan in a slurry 12 meters deep. The dead included 116 students who had just arrived at Pantglas Junior School (picture above). "I could see the black out the window", Gaynor Minett later recalled.

The Tribunal of Inquiry

On October 26, 1966, the Secretary of State for Wales, Cledwyn Hughes, appointed a special tribunal to investigate the Aberfan Disaster. For 76 days, the inquiry interviewed 136 witnesses and examined 300 exhibits. One of these exhibits, a March 1964 letter from D.L. Roberts, the NCB area mechanical engineer, described plans to discontinue tipping "where it is likely to be a source of danger to Pantglas School". Tragically, existing tips such as Colliery Waste Tip No. 7 were left in-place.

In its official report dated August 3, 1967, the inquiry concluded that "the Aberfan Disaster is a terrifying tale of bungling ineptitude by many men charged with tasks for which they were totally unfitted, of failure to heed clear warnings, and of total lack of direction from above". The NBC's legal liability to pay compensation was "incontestable and uncontested", but legal recourse would not bring back Aberfan's children.

Resources:

http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/politics/aberfan/tri.htm

http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/politics/aberfan/let4.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberfan

6 comments; last comment on 10/23/2009
View/add comments

September 22, 1979 - The Vela Incident

Posted September 22, 2009 6:00 AM by ShakespeareTheEngineer

On this day in engineering history, a United States Vela satellite detected a double flash of light in the Indian Ocean between Bouvet Island and the Prince Edward Islands. The satellite's primary mission was to monitor Earth's atmosphere and space for nuclear explosions in accordance with the 1963 Partial Test Ban Treaty, an international agreement that prohibited the detonation of nuclear weapons except underground.

An ad hoc panel later found that the cause of the September 22, 1979 incident was a meteoroid hitting the satellite. Although the panel cited a discrepancy in bhangmeter readings as evidence, others who examined satellite data concluded that the double flash was a nuclear detonation. These parties included government contractors, national laboratories, and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) - a part of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD).

The Partial Test Ban Treaty of 1963 was signed by the world's three nuclear-capable countries (the U.S., U.K. and U.S.S.R.) to limit how often, when, and where these powers could test nuclear weapons. To monitor treaty compliance and help halt nuclear proliferation, the United States launched Project Vela (the word "vela" means vigil in Spanish). .U.S. efforts were divided into three parts: ground (and subterranean), atmospheric, and space/orbit detonations.

Proving a Test Was Harder Than Envisioned – Limitations in Technology

In addition to analyzing data from the Vela satellite, the United States used other methods to determine if the Vela Incident was a nuclear weapons test. Attempts to collect samples of radioactive fallout were unsuccessful, however. First, there was the problem of reaching the remote Indian Ocean site quickly enough. Second, there were technological considerations.

Those who believe the Vela Incident wasn't a nuclear test cite the age of the satellite, which was already two years past its design retirement date. If the satellite's sensors were no longer fully functional, its readings were probably inaccurate. By design, the sensors on these satellites would detect a nuclear test through a light emission variance (a short, initial flash followed by a second, more prolonged flash).

Assigning Responsibility

Although no one has ever claimed responsibility for the Vela Incident of 1979, there have been a number of theories about the source of the nuclear test. Such speculation has always been a hotter question than whether it was a test in the first place, given the state of the Cold War and other geopolitical problems facing the Carter Administration in 1979.

The three most common theories about the origins of a nuclear detonation are that the Vela Incident was a South African test, an Israeli test, or a joint South African-Israeli test.

Project Phoenix?

Given the geographic location of the Vela Incident, a South African connection seems plausible. That Israel would cooperate with the apartheid regime seems less so. Evidence discovered since the end of South Africa's race-based regime casts new light on the mysterious double-flash, however.

At the time, both Israel and South Africa had nuclear ambitions and capabilities. Accordingly, Israel allegedly assisted South African in developing the delivery system (more than the device itself). A 2008 publication, The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and its Proliferation by Thomas C. Reed and Danny B. Stillman add further credence to this possibility.

Thirty years later, details of the Vela Incident remain hidden behind politics, espionage, and government secrecy (even government systems that no longer exist). According to those who have come forward, however, the event was a nuclear test by Israel and South Africa, and possibly dubbed Project Phoenix.

Resources:

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Safrica/Vela.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_Incident

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vela_(satellite)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Vela

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_Test_Ban_Treaty

2 comments; last comment on 09/23/2009
View/add comments

September 14, 1959 – The First Man-Made Object to Reach the Moon

Posted September 14, 2009 6:00 AM by ShakespeareTheEngineer

On this day in engineering history, the now defunct Soviet Union (U.S.S.R.) scored an important victory in the Space Race when its Luna 2 spacecraft crashed into the Moon. It was the first time a man-made object had reached the moon's surface, and further validated the existence of solar winds. Although American astronauts would walk on the Moon just ten years later, the United States had lost another contest to its Cold War rival.

The Soviet Union's Luna Spacecraft

Also known as mechta (meaning"dream" in Russian), Luna 2 was the follow-up spacecraft to the semi-successful Luna 1. In January of 1959, Luna 1 had provided new information about Earth's radiation belt, the lack of a magnetic field on the Moon, and the existence of solar winds (or ionized plasma). When a malfunction in the ground-based control of Luna 1's rockets caused an incorrect burn time, however, the errant spacecraft passed by the Moon at a distance of 5,900 km instead of reaching the lunar surface. Nine months later, the Soviets tried again with the slightly modified Luna 2.

If It Ain't Broke…

That Luna 2 involved more of a tweaking than a complete redesign explains the close launch dates of the two spacecraft. Determined to confirm the existence of the solar wind detected by Luna 1, Konstantin Gringauz redesigned his four sensor ion traps to use a "tetrahedral arrangement, instead of planar, to get better measurements of the plasma flux." There were also adjustments to the three-component fluxgate magnetometer so that its range factor was "reduced by a factor of 4 to -750 to +750 nanoteslas (gammas) so that the quantization uncertainty was -12 to +12 nT."

Mission Accomplished

Luna 2 accomplished its mission in nearly every way. It confirmed readings by Luna 1 and released an orange cloud of sodium gas, which helped the Soviets to track the spacecraft and study the behavior of gas in space. On September 14, 1959, just 36 hours after launch, Luna 2 met its predetermined fate. A sudden loss of radio communication confirmed that it had crashed into the Moon as planned, west of Mare Serenitatis or "The Sea of Serenity". Thirty minutes later, the third stage of the spacecraft's rocket (Luna 2 had no propulsion itself) became the second man-made object to strike the Moon. The nature of these impacts helped prove that the Moon had no appreciable magnetic field or radiation belts.

Soviet Legacy Strewn About

The Soviet space program left some early man-made marks on the moon. America's Cold War rival designed two spheres, each made of pentagonal pennants, which showed the emblem of the Soviet Union and the Cyrillic letters for the U.S.S.R. (CCCP). These metallic "soccer balls" were designed to shatter on impact and scatter the pennants over a large radius. The Soviet Union even went so far as having explosives on Luna 2 to slow the spacecraft's impact speed, ensuring that the pennants were not vaporized on impact. When Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev presented U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower one of the spherical pennants as a gift, it was made ever more clear that the race to the Moon was on.

Resources:

http://www.zarya.info/Diaries/Luna/Luna2.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_2

http://www.mentallandscape.com/V_Pennants.htm

4 comments; last comment on 09/17/2009
View/add comments


Previous in Blog: Homage for Henry! (Part 3)  
Show all Blog Entries in this Blog