OH CR4P! Blog

OH CR4P!

"An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes, which can be made, in a very narrow field." -Niels Bohr

These words frame the OH CR4P! blog, a place which encourages engineers to discuss, reminisce, and learn about mistakes, failures and mishaps made by those who have become "experts" the hard way.

Previous in Blog: Failure of the Therac-25 Medical Linear Accelerator   Next in Blog: Risk and Its Part In Engineering Failure
Close
Close
Close
11 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

Posted February 14, 2012 2:14 PM by cheme_wordsmithy
Pathfinder Tags: disaster dust explosion powder

The consequences of a dusty apartment likely only extend to a couple sneezes or the silent disapproval of guests. But in an industrial setting, the worst-case scenario is much more serious. In fact, dust explosions are among the deadliest of all industrial disasters.

But the materials associated with dust fires are often not ignitable in their typical form (you wouldn't be afraid to put a match to an ear of corn or a sheet of aluminum). Grind these materials up into fine powders, however, and you're dealing with a very different animal.

This is a problem for many industries. Particles have much more exposed surface in contact with the air than solid masses, resulting in a much faster and more violent explosion. Powders and dust can develop as a result of many different processes, including polishing, grinding, transporting, and shaping of different materials. Below is a list of different types of materials involved in dust explosions (Source: dustexplosion.info)

Three Significant Cases

Three of the most deadly dust explosions in the U.S. have occurred within the last decade.

The first of these happened on January 29, 2003 at the West Pharmaceutical Plant in Kingston, North Carolina. Half of the 150,000 square-foot plant was completely destroyed in a chain reaction of explosions that ripped through the plant, killing six people and injuring thirty-six others. The shockwave was said to have broken windows up to 1,000 feet away and propelled debris over two miles. The explosion was the result of a synthetic rubber processing machine, which dipped strips of rubber in finely powdered polyethylene. The ventilation systems were (unbeknownst to the workers) collecting this polyethylene dust on the top side of the ceiling. Investigators believe that the dust was ignited after being disturbed and subsequently suspended in the air.

The second explosion happened less than a month later at the CTA Acoustics manufacturing plant in Corbin, Kentucky. The facility produced fiberglass insulation for the automotive industry. The explosion was fueled by a phenolic binder resin dust which accumulated in the production area and was likely ignited by flames from a malfunctioning oven. The explosion killed seven workers and injured forty others.

A third explosion occurred a little over 4 years ago, February 7th, 2008, at an Imperial Sugar factory in Port Wentworth, Georgia. The initial explosion occurred in the center of the old, four-story refinery, where the sugar was bagged by workers and stored. The explosion caused 13 deaths and 42 injuries. This video provides details surrounding the incident.

What Can Be Done?

Some 30,000 factories in the U.S. are vulnerable to dust explosions based on their operating environments and the substances they work with. Since 1980, around 350 of these explosions have occurred, resulting in 133 fatalities and many more injuries.

So what has gone wrong with these many disasters? I expect that most of these accidents (including the three cases above), can be linked to negligence or ignorance of the associated hazards.

[Nobody thought that sugar dust could do this… Source: CSB.gov]

One of the keys to preventing dust fires and explosions is an understanding of the importance of a clean workplace. News reports regarding the CTA Acoustics explosion revealed that inspectors weren't trained to recognize dust as a critical safety hazard. The same was true for most of the plant workers, who may have said something about the accumulation if they had known. Recognizing the need to keep the facilities clean and relatively dust free would have likely prevented the catastrophic explosions from occurring.

But like all problems, there are many other factors that could provide the ingredients for a dust fire (namely its fuel or ignition source). Hot surfaces, electrical devices, and friction points can all cause ignitions when exposed to sufficient concentrations of particles, and thus equipment needs to be properly designed and maintained (see image below for a chart of responsible ignition sources - Source: dustexplosion.info). Other factors, such as the introduction of open flames or foreign materials by workers, can be prevented by common sense.

Proposals for new safety legislation and standards are still pending 4 years after the Georgia sugar refinery explosion. The difficulty is that many employers do not follow current OSHA safety regulations as they stand.

"It's been on the books since the early 70s. If employers comply with the housekeeping standard, then they have eliminated dust, and you cannot have a combustible dust explosion," says Ed Foulke, the head of OSHA.

I'd like to think that the failure to comply is a failure to understand the possible consequences - a mindset that it is a nuisance to productivity coupled with the "it won't happen to me" syndrome. I can understand this attitude - I sometimes convince myself that a little "organized chaos" is the most productive management system for my own workspace. But then again, my workspace isn't likely to spontaneously combust if it gets too messy…

References:

CBSNews - Is Enough Done to Stop Explosive Dust

Interstates - Preventing Dust Explosions

NFPA Journal - Dust to Dust

OSHA - Combustible Dust In Industry

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: "Dancing over the abyss."
Posts: 4884
Good Answers: 243
#1

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/14/2012 10:28 PM

Nice post. Milo

__________________
People say between two opposed opinions the truth lies in the middle. Not at all! Between them lies the problem, what is unseeable,eternally active life, contemplated in repose. Goethe
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#2

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/15/2012 4:05 AM

I wonder how many of us sneezed as soon as we started reading? (I did).
I'd guess that the accumulation of dust (or other combusibles*) where it can't be seen is a key factor.
Maybe false ceilings should be banned in factory environments?
Del

*Grease laden fluff under the escalator at the King Cross underground station fire.

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/15/2012 5:41 AM
__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Reply
Power-User
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 367
Good Answers: 18
#6
In reply to #2

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/15/2012 9:46 AM

I'm afraid not. In my experience places that do this kind of work are well aware of the mess around them. I spent many weeks doing contracted electrical work inside a plant that manufactured zinc in a town called Clarksville, TN. My first day in the plant workers warned me and my coworkers that sparking metals from banging tools and such should be avoided to prevent ignition of the zinc dust.

Inside the plant one could look in any direction and see dust piled 1/2" thick on every surface. Dust was all over large pieces of equipment like furnaces and mills, on top of electrical conduits running along the walls, clinging to chains and signs hanging from the ceilings, even piled on the tow motors (fork lifts) driving around in the plant. Even if one could claim not to notice the amount of dust in the manufacturing area, it would be impossible not to notice the amount of dust that soiled one's clothes after leaving the manufacturing area.

The ultimate problem is that all safety organizations can really do is complain. Fines for a dusty plant are small enough that a company would rather pay them then spend money on the cleanup and maintenance that would be required to actually fix the problem.

Here's some recent news about dust fires: http://www.chem.info/News/2012/02/Safety-Zinc-Plant-Catches-Fire-Burns/

__________________
The most valuable of all talents is that of never using two words when one will do. ~Thomas Jefferson
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1
#4

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/15/2012 7:51 AM

Education, education, education. Even OSHA need to train the inspectors what to look for. You are correct housekeeping will eliminate most of the explosions or minimise them. The initial explosion creates the main expolsion. The initial explosion disrupes the explosive dust that has settled in the building floor, ceiling, rafters, and on top of equipment. This becomes an explosive cloud and then you have the big one. It happens in milliseconds. The dust needs to be cleaned throughout the building. You need proper practices when cleaning as well. Just blowing dust around and collecting it will cause an expolosive cloud.

Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1602
Good Answers: 19
#7
In reply to #4

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/15/2012 10:45 AM

"Just blowing dust around and collecting it will cause an expolosive cloud."

Once upon a time, I worked in a facility that did this with paper dust. I and the Maintenance foreman half heartedly fought with the Plant Manager over this practice, but could not get him to change the procedure. Hopefully someone better than me has convinced this facility to change their ways in the last 20 years, because blowing dust around in a confined area is just an explosion wating to happen.

__________________
Eventually, one needs to realize that it is far less important to be the smartest person in the room than it is to sit next to that person and make friends.
Reply
Power-User
Hobbies - CNC - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mid-West USA
Posts: 498
Good Answers: 28
#5

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/15/2012 8:29 AM

Very interesting post. Not what I expected when I read the topic. I thought it was going to be another story on black lung but with a factory or machine shop setting.

Grain elevators/bins blow up due to this. I worked for a guy that used to be a crew foreman for a grain elevator/bin installer. He would catch guys playing around with cutting torches while doing repairs inside the bins. They would smack the side of the bin and knock some dust off then light it with the torch WHILE they were inside it. It resulted in a small explosion that popped open the man holes in the top of the bin. He did a demonstration back at the shop with a 55 gallon barrel and a very small amount of dust that drove home how dangerous it was and put a stop to it.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: NYC until mid 2015, currently NC
Posts: 756
Good Answers: 8
#11
In reply to #5

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

04/04/2015 12:19 AM

Unless the guys that "played around" were total dolts, I doubt that they forgot the lesson.

__________________
Good judgment comes from experience, and a lotta that comes from bad judgment.
Reply
Associate

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 51
Good Answers: 1
#8

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/16/2012 6:49 AM

This is not new, factories have been suffering from dust explosions since they were first built a few hundered years ago. The cotton mills in my own area are listed in the newspapers for the number of explosions and deaths. Ships have also blow up, the dust in their storage holds becoming charged.

Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1602
Good Answers: 19
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/16/2012 11:06 AM

I agree that dust explosions are not new. Your comment is NOT off topic.

What is new is that the US OSHA is looking to actively inspect and regulate for dust hazards in the workplace. Perhaps something useful can come from this effort, like an actual redduction in the amount of dust hazards and resulting explosions.

__________________
Eventually, one needs to realize that it is far less important to be the smartest person in the room than it is to sit next to that person and make friends.
Reply
Power-User
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - Technical Writer Engineering Fields - Environmental Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 247
#10

Re: Deadly Dust - The Importance of a Clean Workplace

02/20/2012 3:06 PM

Just found an interesting article regarding dust explosions and nanomaterials:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/02/120215143112.htm

Seems like the nantoechnology/nanomaterial boom could introduce a whole new level of hazards.

__________________
“A man wrapped up in himself makes a very small bundle.” — Benjamin Franklin
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 11 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Casper71 (1); cheme_wordsmithy (1); EElectrician (1); Milo (1); PWSlack (1); Ried (2); Steve Tayloe (1); The Mechanic (1); user-deleted-1105 (1); whatthef (1)

Previous in Blog: Failure of the Therac-25 Medical Linear Accelerator   Next in Blog: Risk and Its Part In Engineering Failure

Advertisement