Electrical Components Blog

Electrical Components

The Electrical Components Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about power generation, distribution and protection; connectors and relays; sensors, RFID & passive components; and magnetics and transformers. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Suppliers Silly to Sabotage Standards?   Next in Blog: Will Batteries Ever Work?
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Replace or Rebuild?

Posted September 17, 2008 1:10 PM

Whether you work with motors, drives, turbines, or electrical controls, eventually things wear out. The same holds true for the production process and facility itself. The issue then is whether to replace the older item or to rebuild it. Regardless of the item in question it comes down to a matter of total cost. For many it's cheaper, easier, and faster to upgrade than to buy or build new. So my question is, how do you calculate the costs and benefits of both? Are your ideas and justifications accepted openly, or are they pushed aside by perceived priorities?

Eventually tools, processes, and even plants wear out. How do you calculate the costs and benefits of replace vs. rebuild? Are your ideas accepted, or do finance department perceptions take precedence?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Electronic Components, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Electronic Components today

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 479
Good Answers: 9
#1

Re: Replace or Rebuild?

09/17/2008 6:05 PM

This is not a new concept.

First there was "engineering economy" which all civil engineers were required to take (you will be asked at least one question on the PE exam).

Then "value engineering" on government funded projects by EPA.

More recently, "life cycle cost analysis" is the buzzword.

All of these methods attempt to determine the best "viable" alternative by considering true cost (take into account inflation).

ENR (Engineering News Record) Cost Index goes back at least 100 years.

These same principals can and should be applied to a production process.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Capital City, Cow Hampshire, USA
Posts: 476
Good Answers: 3
#2

Re: Replace or Rebuild?

09/18/2008 6:35 AM

Some questions i'd ask myself: 'Will the replacement eqpt. be more efficient than the old?' , then: 'Am I more/less likely to be able to obtain spares in the future?'

__________________
If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you've always had!
Reply
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 51
Good Answers: 2
#3

Re: Replace or Rebuild?

09/18/2008 9:30 AM

there are solutions for rebuilding worn machinery, that change the equation: the posibility to apply on site, in operation, a new surface treatment and renew metal surfaces for many more years of operation, at a fraction of the cost of part replacement.

We applied this treatment to gears, bearings, vacuum pumps and compressors, with total success. see www.rewitec.com

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 479
Good Answers: 9
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Replace or Rebuild?

09/18/2008 9:48 AM

Here you are identifying an alternative (repair/rebuild). Let us call this Alternative No. 2.

This is an important step. When available and viable alternatives are not first identified, the outcomes over the life-cycle of the (plant, machine, process, whatever) are not optimized.

So your decision tree may look something like this:

1) replace widget.

2) repair widget.

3) Partial replace widget.

4) No action (do nothing).

So, in this case, Alternative No. 2 has been considered (previous management team never considered "repair" alternative), all cost numbers where calculated over the life-cycle and Alternative #2 was chosen as the best viable alternative, all things considered.

Considerations may include reliability, cost, performance, maintenance, etc.

Costs must include labor, equipment, materials, everything! All costs must be converted to Present Worth $ over the entire life-cycle. Use sinking fund, present worth, etc. cost tables to complete the analysis.

Reply
Associate
United States - Member - Old Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Topeka, Ks.
Posts: 49
Good Answers: 3
#5

Re: Replace or Rebuild?

09/19/2008 2:23 PM

Go back & read your post. The answer is the post itself. Good Luck

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Otto34 (1); Sasnak (1); sidevalveguru (1); user-deleted-9 (2)

Previous in Blog: Suppliers Silly to Sabotage Standards?   Next in Blog: Will Batteries Ever Work?

Advertisement