G. A. Deluga,1 J. R. Salge,1 L. D. Schmidt,1* X. E. Verykios2 Published this Science 13 February 2004: Vol. 303. no. 5660, pp. 993 – 997 DOI: 10.1126/science.1093045
By putting 103 Proof Ethanol through a rhodium -ceria on a ceramic foam they produced 160% of the ethanol into hydrogen in an exothermic reaction(100% from ethanol and 60% more from the water).
This bypasses the major cost of fuel from ethanol which is water removal. If one can produce 52.5% ethanol in a single distillation, At the time this was published with poor resources I figured the cost at $0.16 per the BTU equivalent of a gallon(U.S.) gas for production.
My question or statement is why was this never developed into a Hydrogen production even by the major players?
Yes they would make less money but the P.R. gain could have been huge.
I have never seen anything else about it. Did I miss some design flaw or other?
2 bits from
Brad