Previous in Forum: Peristaltic Vs Diaphragm   Next in Forum: Book Review: The Big Bang Never Happened
Close
Close
Close
29 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Anonymous Poster

Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/01/2008 4:36 PM

I was wondering if Newton's laws of motion could be applied into cold fusion? "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" If this was true it would take an equal amount of energy (to be absorbed) to fuse the cells, as given off when split. Could it be possible that in cold fusion experiments when energy was recorded; that it registered energy that was attracted (or produced by the cells) in order to fuse together. Then that energy (which we are trying to get) was used up in the fusion process? This could explain the heat that was recorded in the experiments (friction). If the energy could be extracted just before fusion it would harness the maximum potential of the cell and no heat would be given off because of the lack of friction.

I'm no expert in the subject. I just wondering. Any thoughts from the big guns?

Should we be looking at Cold Pre-Fusion?

Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#1

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/01/2008 5:03 PM

No.

Newtons Laws of motion only apply on a Macro scale... At atomic level it's a totally different ball game (little joke there... 'cos balls would follow Newton's Laws...ok it wasn't that funny ....sue me..)

Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - Sworn to preserve and protect Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - How tiny is it? APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Good idea. Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - Energy in Transition

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near DC, USA
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 15
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/01/2008 6:47 PM

Del,

Have you followed the thread at http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/20925#comment219848

It has turned into quite a discussion - better than I had hoped when I started it. Call me a romantic if you wish, but I see some hope that the cold fusion thing, whatever the effect is caused by, will turn into something very significant.

Regards.

__________________
“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't.” – Samuel Clemens in Following the Equator, Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#6
In reply to #3

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 2:16 AM

Nope..the posts were too long for my Catly attention thingy.....

Brevity is a vertue.

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: The 'Space Coast', USA
Posts: 11119
Good Answers: 918
#2

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/01/2008 6:05 PM

The context for Newton's Laws are for mechanical motion.

They do not apply to atomic fission or fusion. The two processes are quite different from each other and involve conversion of some mass to energy, which is not related to Newton's mechanical Laws of motion.

The process for Cold Fusion is unknown. It was touted as a deuterium-deuterium fusion reaction, but there are no byproducts in the amounts required to account for the reaction (among other issues), so it probably isn't nuclear fusion.

Mainstream science has passed on further study into Cold Fusion, but there are a core of believers that continue to refine the experiments hoping for a breakthrough.

There is a whole thread on this that goes on ad nausium if you have a lot of free time. Wikipedia gives a good summation on the subject, too.

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Popular Science - Paleontology - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Popular Science - Genetics - New Member Popular Science - Biology - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: The Nevernever as much as possible, Earth when I have no choice.
Posts: 665
Good Answers: 11
#4

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/01/2008 11:15 PM

Dear Guest, As I understand it, much of the laws of physics do not apply at the subatomic level. For example the concept of Perpetual Motion is considered impossible at the macro level, but is an absolute necessity at the subatomic level.

Just a thought Dragon

__________________
Ignorance is the beginning of knowledge. Heresy is the beginning of wisdom. The ignorant heretic is the wisest of all.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: KnoxTN
Posts: 1485
Good Answers: 6
#5

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/01/2008 11:48 PM

The Cold Fusion announcement was not made in any scientific paper and was not reproducible by respected university and college research staff members.

The question of Newton's laws of motion is not relevant as it does not apply to atomic or nuclear reactions.

__________________
Do Nothing Simply When a Way Can be Found to Make it Complex and Wonderful
Reply
Power-User
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - Sworn to preserve and protect Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - How tiny is it? APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Good idea. Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - Energy in Transition

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near DC, USA
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 15
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 5:39 AM

Lack of reproducibility - Urban Legend.

Szpak, S., P.A. Mosier-Boss, and F. Gordon. Experimental Evidence for LENR in a Polarized Pd/D Lattice. in NDIA 2006. 2006. Washington, DC.

Coauthors: Mosier-Boss, P. A., Gordon, F.
Category: Experiment particle
Keywords: neutron, co-deposition, voltage, magnetic field

Recent experiments at the U.S. Navy San Diego SPAWAR Systems Center have demonstrated nuclear effects with palladium co-deposition cathodes subjected to magnetic or high voltage fields. CR-39 is used to detect high energy particles. It is placed in close proximity to the cathode because the particles do not travel far. These experiments appear to be highly reproducible.

DOWNLOAD

(This reflects research from US Navy Space and Naval Warfare Center (SPAWAR) Research sho has repeated the effect - also by Naval Research Labs (NRL) and Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division, china Lake. That is just US Navy - with whom I am affiliated. The effect has been reproduced by various universities in US as well as National Labs and Univeristy Labs overseas. Look it up. Its easy.)

__________________
“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't.” – Samuel Clemens in Following the Equator, Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar
Reply
Power-User
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - Sworn to preserve and protect Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - How tiny is it? APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Good idea. Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - Energy in Transition

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near DC, USA
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 15
#8
In reply to #5

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 5:47 AM

One of Many who reproduced the effect early on:

From the University of Utah Research Park, Salt Lake City, Utah: National Cold Fusion Institute.

Storms, E. and C.L. Talcott, Electrolytic tritium production. Fusion Technol., 1990. 17: p. 680.

Coauthors: Talcott, C. L.
Category: Experiment particle
Keywords: electrolysis, Pd, D2O, tritium

Abstract
Fifty-three electrolytic cells of various configurations and electrode compositions were examined for
tritium production. Significant tritium was found in eleven cells at levels between 1.5 and 80 times the
starting concentration after enrichment corrections are made.

DOWNLOAD

__________________
“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't.” – Samuel Clemens in Following the Equator, Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar
Reply
Power-User
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - Sworn to preserve and protect Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - How tiny is it? APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Good idea. Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - Energy in Transition

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near DC, USA
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 15
#9
In reply to #5

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 6:00 AM

More recent. From the National Science Academy of Japan and published in the Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, http://www.ipap.jp/jjap/index.htm.:

Arata, Y. and Y.C. Zhang, Anomalous 'deuterium-reaction energies' within solid. Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B, 1998. 74 B: p. 155.

Coauthors: Zhang, Y. C.
Category: Experiment heat
Keywords: electrolysis Pd, Pd-black, heat+, D2O, H2

The abstract begins:
Both D2O-cell and H2O-cell are constructed with the same Double Structure Cathode (DS-cathode), and connected in series as a "Double-cell" to examine the energy generation under the same electrolytic current. D2O-cell generates tremendously excess energy during a long. Such as over several thousand hours, but any energy is never generated in H2O-cell when the chemical energy is subtracted in both cells. . . .

DOWNLOAD

(Note they claim the Deuterium cell generated "tremendous excess energy" for thousands of hours. Fairly repeated.)

__________________
“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't.” – Samuel Clemens in Following the Equator, Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar
Reply
Power-User
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - Sworn to preserve and protect Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - How tiny is it? APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Good idea. Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - Energy in Transition

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near DC, USA
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 15
#10
In reply to #5

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 6:47 AM

Do you like Stanford University? McKubre is from Stanford.

McKubre, M.C.H. Cold Fusion at SRI (PowerPoint slides). in APS March Meeting. 2007. Denver, CO.

Coauthors:
Category: Experiment other
Keywords: sonofusion

Cold Fusion at SRI
An 18 Year Retrospective
(and brief Prospective)

DOWNLOAD

I could go because there are thousands of citations from all over the world. Bottom line is that it is a mistake to discount this technology. It is definitely real. If it can be controlled it will change the world.

I gotta go get some breakfast now, but thanks ....

Well, one more thing. It bothers me to see Dr. Fleischmann run down as some kind of quack. Just take a look at this exerpt from one biography:

In 1967, at the remarkably young age of 40, Fleischmann was offered a position as the chair of electrochemistry at the University of Southampton. There, he built up the department and, in doing so, earned it a world-class reputation. He was the recipient of numerous awards during this time. From 1970 to 1972, he held the prestigious post of president of the International Society of Electrochemists. In 1979, he was awarded the medal for electrochemistry and thermodynamics by the Royal Society of London. In 1983, he retired from Southampton. Two years later, in 1985, he was awarded the Palladium Medal by the U.S. Electrochemical Society, and he received the highest honor for an English scientist, Fellowship in the Royal Society.

__________________
“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't.” – Samuel Clemens in Following the Equator, Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 749
Good Answers: 13
#13
In reply to #10

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 9:27 AM

"I could go because there are thousands of citations from all over the world. Bottom line is that it is a mistake to discount this technology. It is definitely real. If it can be controlled it will change the world."

Ummm...

If numbers of believers is the determining standard how about praying for energy from a cold fusion cell?

I have no doubt there are untold hundreds of millions who would agree that is the way to go.

Anyway, I have this personal Demon, Mxxxxlllppplx, that hangs out over me ready and willing to grant me anything I want. He tells me if you will pray to him just before you eat your breakfast he will alter Newton's laws, and further alter the laws of nuclear physics and so ensure that cold fusion cells, the ones with double-diodium cathodes will produce all manner of free energy. All that as soon as you have finished breakfast.

As a bonus he will ensure that your car will henceforth run on pure water.

j.

Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Power-User
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - Sworn to preserve and protect Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - How tiny is it? APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Good idea. Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - Energy in Transition

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near DC, USA
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 15
#22
In reply to #13

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 3:15 PM

Very strange attempt at a put-down, Jack. Stan suggested there was no corroborating evidence for a particular physical phenomenon. I provided information to help him understand his error. Your response is to suggest this somehow makes me a religious extremist. What a wild, wild disconnect!

See those every now and then......

__________________
“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't.” – Samuel Clemens in Following the Equator, Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Anonymous Poster
#11

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 8:46 AM

OK OK - We could throw Newton overboard. But still no one really answered the question. If splitting the atom creates energy -could the reverse affect happen when trying to fuse them together. And with experiments showing that there is energy present when fusion happens - is it possible that the energy is spent up when the atoms fuse together? Could there be away of extracting the energy just before they use it for them selves? V1sor gave me some great links -thanks for that.

so bottom line - theory (see underlined) - Energy is created in order for fusion to occur. The atom absorbs the energy in order to fuse to another. Is it possible to steel the energy just before fusion, to see how much is present?

Reply
Power-User
United States - US - Statue of Liberty - Sworn to preserve and protect Engineering Fields - Nanoengineering - How tiny is it? APIX Pilot Plant Design Project - Member - Good idea. Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Engineering Fields - Energy Engineering - Energy in Transition

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near DC, USA
Posts: 128
Good Answers: 15
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 9:24 AM

I am not entirely certain I understand, but lets try this: A variety of types of atoms, and nuclear components, can be caused to join together. That process is called fusion. Causing the process to occur takes a BIG push on a very small scale. It is no small task. In most combinations the payoff is the possibility of an interesting reaction, but the cost is use of a LOT of energy. It is known that fusion of hydrogen (one proton) into helium (two protons) will be one of those very interesting reactions, because it generates a lot more energy than is input. That is the point of the process commonly referred to as "fusion." In other cases the reverse is true.

I think you are asking if fusion could be used as type of refrigeration. It is an interesting question. I am not aware anyone has tried to pursue it, but I am confident it would be extremely difficult at best.

Am I even close to answering your question?

__________________
“Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities. Truth isn't.” – Samuel Clemens in Following the Equator, Pudd'nhead Wilson's New Calendar
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 749
Good Answers: 13
#23
In reply to #11

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 5:43 PM

The question has been answered a half dozen ways.

In fusing hydrogen atoms (The basis of the hydrogen bomb) energy excess to the fusion, energy that comes from the fusion process itself, is liberated.

Very good engineers, who in my opinion have been underfunded, have been trying for a great many years to contain the process so as to utilize that excess energy/heat for any number of purposes.

Ain't no mystery or puzzle in that. Not even an unproven theory.

It is an unsolved engineering problem that ought to be soluble in a manner 'sides blowing people up with it.

As for our friend with atoms forced through a tube, you may design car manufacturing tool components, but if I came to to you and told you I heard of a way to force garbage through a tube and extract there-from a neat self powered stamping press but I forgot where or when, just what would you tell me.

To be explicit your notion of forcing atoms through a tube and extracting energy therefrom, no matter where or when you think you heard it, excessive to what you used to do so, assuming such a thing at all, seems just as absurd as my garbage turned stamping press.

Now you may be a good engineer so you might be interested in buying a classical, historical example of first rate engineering. It is an absolute antique of great value and has been bought and sold many times. I'll let you have it cheap and it is in a prime location.

Would you like to buy the Brooklyn Bridge?

j.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#26
In reply to #23

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 7:38 PM

No Jack, He might actually listen and try to think of a way to make what you were describing. Not immediately "Your on drugs!" Maybe you should rethink the way you present your thoughts. Or not.

Blue

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 749
Good Answers: 13
#27
In reply to #26

Re: Cold Fusion - Just a theory

05/02/2008 11:52 PM

Blue,

If he listened and tried to make what I was describing, and you think that would be a reasonable thing to do given my proposition, if I hadn't been taken for a smart ass, then there is something wrong here and it ain't with me cause my proposition was shear nutso.

This thread started with a proposition trying to apply Newtonian Mechanics concepts to atomic and sub-atomic areas. A couple of people tried to straighten that out.

Then Cadop, who apparently manages a cad department that actualizes tool engineering propositions in cad driven mechanical drawings popped in with atoms lined up single file and forced down a tube to somehow extract energy.

My entry was actually half kidding. Instead somebody got insulted instead of looking at what they were proposing and hopefully trying to examine it self-critically.

The rest naturally followed.

I am pretty careful what I put on this site. There are folks who are just getting jammed into industry in places where they get inadequate or no training and work in places where industry is just starting up and pretty crude.

Imagine the foundry described in the NY Times where guys wearing nothing but a loin cloth and shoes are carrying and pouring molten iron from hand ladles into floor molds to cast manhole covers for NYC. Pretty crude and pretty dangerous.

Some of the stuff on here, put up by one or another often well meaning person, can get folks without adequate knowledge in serious trouble. True, atoms lined up and forced down a tube does not reach that level. Nonetheless, questionable material should be challenged.

My attitude is you contribute to a discussion, do so without being subjective. You can't back up or source what you say, like any good academic, scientist, or engineer...What else is there to say?

j.

Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Anonymous Poster
#14

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 9:57 AM

What I'm trying to say is when they are pushed together and energy is created by the atoms, if not extracted, they use the energy produced in order to fuse to each other. So - while being pushed together, the time when the maximum amount of energy is being produced by the atoms, could the energy be taken from them before the combination of the 2? Wouldn't that be the ideal time to extract the energy? Let them gear up for fusion, but don't let it happen. Steal the energy from them.

Hence a Pre-fusion extraction

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 749
Good Answers: 13
#15
In reply to #14

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 10:31 AM

The energy released is excess to that of fusion, i.e., becomes available as the result of fusion. It is some of the energy that was used to hold two nuclei together as disparate bodies but becomes excess when the two are forced to become one.

Now let's see what kind of imaginary schemes there are to access that energy before fusion. Perhaps a tri-diodium cathode?

j.

Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Anonymous Poster
#24
In reply to #15

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 7:22 PM

Here we go again!! It would be nice if these discussions actually were such, not some sick form of bashing people who have a different opinion!

Grow up!!

Blue

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
2
Commentator
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Near Boston, MA USA
Posts: 71
Good Answers: 1
#16
In reply to #14

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 10:44 AM

The reason that fusion reactions create so much energy is because when the atoms fuse, the resultant mass of the fused atom is slightly less than the combined mass of the two individual atoms. The "missing" mass is converted directly into energy according to Einstein's wonderful equation of E=mc^2. This is how you get the energy from fusion...it sounds like some people here think it is somehow similar to "momentum" or some kind of kinetic energy but it is not. I hope this helps clear things up.

__________________
"That's just my opinion, I could be completely wrong."--Dennis Miller
Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
#17

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 11:24 AM

I've heard of an experiment where atoms were forced through a tube in a single line and energy was produced and extracted. Could this be the same concept?

__________________
"Lie to me baby, I have no use for the truth."
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 749
Good Answers: 13
#18
In reply to #17

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 1:47 PM

Concepts can be anything you can imagine in your mind depending on what you are smoking. "I've heard" tempts me to put you in that category.

This is an engineering site. You know folks that deal in hard stuff, iron bar and structures, masonry, gases, electricity, I'm sure you get the idea.

Hard stuff in mind is also specific information traceable to specific sources and as well supported by hard material data.

So where did you hear?

j.

Reply
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
#19

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 1:56 PM

Actually the experiment was conducted in Asia. The were to attach the machine to a seven story building and see if they could power it for 24 hours. This was bout 5 or 6 years ago. I don't know how the experiment ended out - due to a busy life style I lost track of it. But I did see a segment in the news when they were preparing the connections to the building. So sorry, but I didn't hear it from a friend - who knew a guy - who was seeing..........

__________________
"Lie to me baby, I have no use for the truth."
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 749
Good Answers: 13
#20
In reply to #19

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 2:25 PM

So what did you say you smoked?

j.

Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
#21

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 3:02 PM

What ever Jerksawitz

Sorry but I didn't know that you where the holder of everything knowledgeable. Deepest regrets. I guess that I must of dreamed it or even better made it up. Does that make you feel better?

And even though it's pretty much legal hear, I don't smoke it.

And as for "This is an engineering site. You know folks that deal in hard stuff, iron bar and structures, masonry, gases, electricity, I'm sure you get the idea."

You must pardon me, I wasn't aware of the guild lines of the boys club. I should just put my tail between my legs and go back to my office and finish designing the machinery that is used for the production of automobiles. Sorry if I don't meet up to your standards.

Cadop = Computer Aided Design Operations (which I happen to run the department)

__________________
"Lie to me baby, I have no use for the truth."
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#25
In reply to #21

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/02/2008 7:29 PM

Don't let it get to you Cadop, There are those who create and those whose only purpose in life is to say "Your wrong! That can't be true, because I don't understand it!"

We all have to decide who we listen to and who we ignore.

Blue

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Associate

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
#28

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/05/2008 8:48 AM

If you read what I wrote, you would notice that I didn't purpose anything. I was following the story for a couple of weeks, and even had a segment on the news about their attempts. Sorry if I can't recall the details, but if experiment was in the lines of what the person who started this thread was thinking, it would give them a direction to follow. That's all I was trying to do, and even hoping maybe someone else heard of such an experiment and could give more details about it (even if it wasn't successful).

But suggesting I must of been smoking something (not only once) just shows how ignorant you truly are. You don't know who I am or what I do. I'm a Mechanical Engineer and my wife is a Chemical Engineer. So we do discuss experiments that are out there, even if they are a stretch in finding a solution. But like everyone we hope that maybe some break through could be made, even if it's understanding something a little bit more through failures. If who ever started this thread really was interested, they could try to find out what happened with the experiment.

But you just blew it off because it was something that you never heard of. What if everyone thought like you - no experiments would get of the drawing board do to scepticism.

And another thing - my wife LOVES it when I wear my loan cloth. You should see the smile on her face.

Thanks Blue

__________________
"Lie to me baby, I have no use for the truth."
Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Anonymous Poster
#29
In reply to #28

Re: Newton's Laws of Motion and Cold Fusion

05/06/2008 6:51 PM

S'up Cadop! Sorry, couldn't resist. Da Nada. I do have one small question: LOAN Cloth? If you meant LOIN CLOTH that conjures up an image that will take care of MY nightmares for the next six months!!

Your partner in impossibility, Blue

Reply
Reply to Forum Thread 29 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Hero (1); Anonymous Poster (6); cadop (4); Dragonsfarm (1); Jack Jersawitz (6); JimR79 (1); Stirling Stan (1); user-deleted-1105 (2); v1sor (7)

Previous in Forum: Peristaltic Vs Diaphragm   Next in Forum: Book Review: The Big Bang Never Happened

Advertisement