Deep Ice

Is that the majority of the man-made CO2 emissions comes from the burning of fossil fuels with the remainder coming from slash and burn farming. Fossil fuels are a limited resource and soon wont be able to provide for our ever growing energy needs. In other words, our own greed will force us to develope a better method of generating energy. As none of the current alternatives lead to CO2 emmissions (fission, fusion, solar, etc.), we should be alright. Of course the temperature of the planet will be higher by then, but hopefully not substantially higher.

Too much of CO2 sure will change the atmosphere for a while and next 100 years will be badly affected.

Perhaps, this excess CO2 will be eaten away by forest trees if they are not disturbed. This is the only natural way to keep the CO2 in limit.

For nature, there is a way to show its anger, when limits are crossed. You can have endless fun in nature destruction.

Shyam

Try reading the massive data at www.co2science.com and realize that co2 is a good thing, and that we should thank people who drive SUVs for making co2. Wild fires and natural burning creates many bad things, such as soot, NOx and co, whereas a good running engine burns the fuel into co2 and h2o. We should tripple co2 concentration, not lower them. CO2 has next to no effect on warming, according to the data. I find it funny that nobody would hire an engineer who made a computer model to simulate a process when he gets the wrong answers consistantly, but when politics get involved, these same failing engineer are listened to and considered experts, when they clearly have no clue, according to the data. Try getting the climate models to match real world data. If you can't, you don't have a model, you have fiction. The facts show we want more co2, not less, especially if the solar cycle is increasing. Read co2science.com and get the facts straight. Turn your brain on...