Previous in Forum: Calculate of filler for counterflow packer cooling tower   Next in Forum: mechanics of materials
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7

maintenance factor "m" & minimum design seating stress

05/30/2009 12:55 AM

Good Morning to all

i want to know what will be affect on flange thikness of "m" & "y" value and why?

is there any fixed relation between them?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
4
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 295
Good Answers: 51
#1

Re: maintenance factor "m" & minimum design seating stress

05/30/2009 2:39 AM

Good (very early) morning, in my part of the world.

For in-depth details you should look to Appendix 2 in ASME Section VIII Div 1.

But in general, the flange thickness will need to increase with increasing "m" and "y" values. I say "in general", because it depends on 2 conditions: 1. Operating 2. Gasket seating. Whereas the operating condition is usual the larger value of the two (refer Wm1 in App.2 VIII-1) and governs the joint and only depends on "m" and not "y"; however, this detail is most likely a moot point because an increase in either "m" or "y" almost always means an increase in the other.

The reason is due to the moment created across the gasket surface:

(picture just for illustration taken from another source, so the nomenclature does not match VIII-1)

So you can see that when you increase "m" and "y", you require a larger bolt load, which causes a greater moment, and thusly requires a thicker flange to keep the stress levels within allowable.

  • The thickness is more simple with a blind flange, see UG-34:
    • t = d(CP/SE + 1.9WhG/SEd3)1/2
      • where the value of 'W' is directly related to "m" and "y", so you can see that if you increase "m" and "y", you increase W, and consequently 't' must be increased.
  • The thickness of regular flanges is a little more involved so you should refer to App. 2 VIII-1; but the general principle is the same:
    • increase "m" and "y" → require a larger bolt load → create a larger moment → require a thicker flange
__________________
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Egypt - Member - Member since 02/18/2007

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1733
Good Answers: 248
#2
In reply to #1

Re: maintenance factor "m" & minimum design seating stress

05/31/2009 3:11 PM

My dear XMech you derived a good reply with my "Good Answer".

And I recommend for sandeeppandey0789 to do such a calculations by himself (manually or by using ready made software) using different values for "m" and "y" to see their effect on flange thickness.

__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 295
Good Answers: 51
#3
In reply to #2

Re: maintenance factor "m" & minimum design seating stress

05/31/2009 9:01 PM

Thanks Abdel!!

__________________
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

Previous in Forum: Calculate of filler for counterflow packer cooling tower   Next in Forum: mechanics of materials
You might be interested in: Seating, Flange Protectors, Flange Mounted Bearings

Advertisement