Previous in Forum: What's the Generic Name for This Machine?   Next in Forum: Fluids and Heat Pipes
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4

Chilled Water and Condenser Water Piping

06/17/2009 3:19 PM

How to calculate the chilled water pipe sizes & condenser water pipe sizes for higher flow rates like 20,000 gpm & above.what is the recommended friction loss & fluid velocity in the piping system.As we come across this type of thing in district cooling.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
3
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 295
Good Answers: 51
#1

Re: Chilled Water and Condenser Water Piping

06/17/2009 9:17 PM

It is a matter of compromise between the two -

  1. High velocity = higher pressure drop = smaller pipe size = smaller installed cost ⁄ higher operating costs
  2. Low velocity = lower pressure drop = larger pipe size = higher installed cost ⁄ lower operating costs

For general water service you should look for a velocity around 5 -10 ft⁄s, therefore:

20,000 gpm (imp) = 44.56 ft3⁄s

Choose a velocity of say 7.5 feet⁄s

Then you need a pipe internal area of 44.56⁄7.5 = 5.94 ft2 = 855.36 in2

Which correlates to 34 inch - XS pipe.

Of course actual flowrates depend on length of pipe, fittings, valves, elevations, ..... and of course the pump capacities.

Remember this is only a guideline, and if you want to design for higher velocities you may to a point, so if you have extra pump horsepower and are not worried about operating cost, then you can use smaller piping.

But be particularly mindful of water hammer with higher velocities - that much water has a lot of momentum.

__________________
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Chilled Water and Condenser Water Piping

06/17/2009 11:54 PM

The 7.5 ft/s seems reasonable for first estimation. For a project of this size, you might want to do an economic analysis. Select a few pipe sizes either side of this initial choice, calculate the pressure losses via Darcy-Weisbach, Williams-Hazen, or other accepted formula (or by whatever formula your local jurisdiction may require). Then size the pump(s) accordingly. Compare the installation costs with the operating costs over the desired time frame. Don't forget pipe insulation for any chilled water lines. You will almost surely find that much larger or smaller piping is uneconomical, but two or three standard pipe sizes in the middle will be credible options.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#3

Re: Chilled Water and Condenser Water Piping

06/18/2009 3:25 AM

For a liquid, just keep the velocity between 1m/s and 3m/s, as a rule-of-thumb. If it's outside those limits, the pipe diameter is wrong.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: O'er looking the silvery Tay
Posts: 255
Good Answers: 18
#4

Re: Chilled Water and Condenser Water Piping

06/22/2009 11:07 AM

Hi m z,

The real issue with district cooling or heating is the management of the differential temperature. If you can double the delta T then you can halve the Q!

I've spent years sorting out systems where the Q is far too high and the pumping losses are excessive. You should look very closely at the application end and see how to maximise the uptake of the thermal energy by stretching the deltaT. I know that large scale chilled water distribution is difficult to control and pumping costs become very uneconomic without demand side regulation. If you are using waste heat as the source of the cooling effect think in terms of distributing the hot water(larger Delta T) to absorbtion cycle chillers and save on the pumping costs.

__________________
If it ain't broke,leave it well alone .........until it comes looking for you!
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Register to Reply 4 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Massey 726 (1); PWSlack (1); Tornado (1); XMech (1)

Previous in Forum: What's the Generic Name for This Machine?   Next in Forum: Fluids and Heat Pipes

Advertisement