Previous in Forum: What is the English Word for This Machining Activity?   Next in Forum: VALVE WITH DIFFERENT SCHEDULE AT BOTH END
Close
Close
Close
17 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: India
Posts: 111

Pipe ID and Pipe OD

11/23/2009 4:43 PM

All,

Some pipes are denoted /described by ID & some by OD.

What is the idea behind this philosophy?

Thanks

__________________
Be simple and specific for a great success in Life
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/23/2009 6:35 PM

Pipe is defined by ID, tubing is defined by OD.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Anonymous Poster
#3
In reply to #1

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/23/2009 10:07 PM

Pipe is defined by ID, is controversial (unless you put almost)

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Childers, Queensland
Posts: 412
Good Answers: 5
#6
In reply to #1

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 1:33 AM

Pipe is defined by ID, tubing is defined by OD.

Just to elaborate slightly "Pipe is defined by ID" because it's original purpose was as a vessel to carry fluids hence the inside was the important dimension AND "tubing is defined by OD" because it's original purpose was structural hence the outside was the important dimension!

However, engineers like tubing for stuffing fluid in cos' it's handy and some joker made a whole load of fittings for tubing to facilitate it's use as a pipe. Now pipe and tube is indelibly mixed!

__________________
"A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools!" Douglas Adams 1952-2001. E&OE!
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/23/2009 9:27 PM

Practically it was of importance to me for fits.

Interior Dimension is 3/4" for instance and outside Dimension is 1" for instance.

I had no idea at all philosophy was involved.

I thought this sort of thing was simply about physics.

I thought I needed to know both interior dimension and exterior, outside dimensions when putting stuff together in places.

Big ID to small ID over distance maintains pressure when doing plumbing.

Big wires come in the house, and then small wires spread throughout.

Similar "Philosophy".

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#4

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/23/2009 10:08 PM

The reason for this "philosophy" seems to be buried in history. I'm not sure this is a correct explanation, which I heard long ago: Once upon a time, pipe was made from wrought iron according to inside diameter, with a wall thickness to suit typical pressures. This established an O.D. for each pipe size, and pipe is actually manufactured by O.D. With the advent of steel, the wall thickness could be less. The O.D. was maintained and the I.D. enlarged. Thus what started out as 1/2-inch pipe (0.840 O.D.) is now still 0.840 O.D., but 0.622 I.D. (Schedule 40). The old 1/2-inch designation was retained, but only as a nominal, rather than actual, I.D.

I don't think there are any formulas for this; instead it is semi-arbitrary, and you have to look things up in a table. Engineering handbooks and pipe catalogs have this information, as do many online resources. It takes a bit of getting used to, but there actually is some underlying sense to it all.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
2
Guru
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member Egypt - Member - Member since 02/18/2007

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cairo, Egypt
Posts: 1733
Good Answers: 248
#5

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/23/2009 11:09 PM

Pipe is defined by its nominal pipe size NPS and its Schedule, i.e there are standard dimensions for such a pipe, and in this case we can call it as pipe, unless it will become a tube which characterized by its non-standard dimensions.

So, tube -in general- is defined by its OD and its thickness, except that tubes used in fired heater furnaces and heat exchangers, where we can define their tubes by its NPS and Schedule or by its OD and BWG (Birmingham Wire Gauge).

See CR4 Threads: Tubes or Pipes? & The Difference Between Tubes and Pipes

__________________
It is better to be defeated on principles, than to win on lies!
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#7
In reply to #5

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 3:01 AM

GA. Unfortunately, this thread and all others referenced herein are riddled with errors. Correct information is present in each of these threads, too, but an unfamiliar reader won't be able to tell which is which.

Among the more unusual items are 1) spiral-welded pipe formed from helically wound skelp, and 2) elliptical tube, which is used in some high-end bicycles and in at least one brand of evaporative condensers (resulting in an advantageous air flow path over the staggered tubes).

Playing into all of this are 1) history and 2) the manufacturing processes involved. I wish I could find a video from an evap condenser manufacturer--it would be quite something to watch. If there is enough interest in this, I will try to describe it later.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#9
In reply to #7

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 4:06 AM

GA. Unfortunately, this thread and all others referenced herein are riddled with errors

Then why GA?

Google "Non standard pipes" and you will see the number of entries.

Standard Tubes - any way are covered under specs.

The difference of pipe and tubes (likely came through wiki) is a bit outdated.

And leaving aside the non-circular tubes (usually though they should be, in common day parlance nobody calls them)

The above comment (NPS and Schedule) is limited to the standard (BHPV to be specific- but there is life outside that too- for example the lines used to carry water or oil or ... are pipe line or tube line?) and for that purpose, you have the standards for pipes and tubes. And the same thing applies for non-standard (as well as many standards who differ - DIN, JIS,...)

The main difference between pipe and tube is the usage and fitment on the ends- how one is going to end the channel - through adhesion (welding or any other type) /threading/ - pipe, through fittings- tube.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#10
In reply to #9

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 4:58 AM

The GA is for Mr. Galala's post. He is especially well informed and almost invariably helpful.

The thread includes many other posts that are poorly informed, including such nonsense as non-seamless being called seamless, or tube being measured by I.D.

(One of the other cited threads includes a delightful parody of pipe/tube specifications, including such gems as "tubing shall be perfectly tubular, and piping shall be perfectly pipular" and "the I.D. shall be smaller than the O.D., or else the hole would be on the outside.") In a similar vein, if L/D ≈ 100, it's long pipe; if L/D ≈ 10, it's short pipe; if ≈ 1, it's a spacer; if L/D ≈ 0.1, it's a washer. If it's male on both ends, it's a nipple; go figure. Not to mention unions and couplings and other such pornography.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Anonymous Poster
#11
In reply to #10

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 11:24 AM

This is what keeps me away from registering in this forum.

He is especially well informed and almost invariably helpful.

1. With due regards, telling the OP to search CR4 earlier posts - I have seen at least in other hundreds of threads but none got GA.

2. You yourself has mentioned that "The thread includes many other posts that are poorly informed, including such nonsense as non-seamless being called seamless, or tube being measured by I.D"

Do these threads (as per your own admission) help the OP to get the answer he need?

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 6)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#12
In reply to #11

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 12:04 PM

"This is what keeps me away from registering in this forum."

Obviously, it doesn't keep you from sharing your opinions. And how, exactly, does your unsolicited criticism help the OP?

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 3)
Anonymous Poster
#13
In reply to #12

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 12:41 PM

That has,

In post #1- It was you who have hit the nail on head- of course no GA for you. You were exactly correct (except the Pipe ID part, in minor way, since now Pipes also are OD defined).

later I have elaborated that aspect in other posts. The OP has been answered and no GA for them. Guests do not matter, but yours could and should have.

I am not squabbling or nit-picking, but sometimes facts hurt.

Just look at how-many GAs you have given (may be just for the sake) - and how many got for the one you should have earned. And I have seen a lot of deserving GAs missed. Want a list ?

Search a few of the interesting topics and you yourself will see it.

regards.

BTW: I am already OT, so pressing another extra OT- does it matter, may be smoothens some ruffled ego .

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#14
In reply to #13

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 1:30 PM

You, and many others, place FAR TOO MUCH emphasis on GA's.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Anonymous Poster
#17
In reply to #14

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/25/2009 3:50 AM

Of course not . Sorry to prove you just a bit wrong.

I am on guest role, missing GAs , and getting GAs (even as a guest ). You may call me on a mission to check the maturity of the forum members- though I agree that I am incapable of, but then I have been always an iconoclast.

This is a serious technical forum, and then the answers are on the merit of the answer and not on the merit of the poster. You have contradicted yourself when you said that You, and many others, place FAR TOO MUCH emphasis on GA's.

If You didn't why do you award GAs to person and not the contents ?

The GAs as phys has mentioned once - are just for an average person to have a cursory glance and read through the GAs only - so that he does not have to go through the n posts (not verbatim, only the sense).

GA marks are to take out the relevant (GA) from semi relevant (normal) to irrelevant (OTs).

It must bring some thing relevant and new - not some thing that has been so often repeated that it has lost the charm. The OP should have checked previous threads - and there are a number of them - or even used a search engine.

Pipe or Tube, What is the weight of MS Angle, What pressure ... schedule, ... are the threads that the OP must be politely asked to search on the forum. Politely, since a lot of the members do not know the facility.

As far as GA is concerned, I get my satisfaction from the facts that OP is satisfied (what is the english word, worm gear efficiency,....).

Had I wanted GA, I would have logged in my avatar and filled my kitty.

I am not arguing about what is the policy you, or others put on marking GAs just putting a spark of introspection.

And as far as the knowledgeable and helpfulness is concerned, we do have a lot of others here (and they are sadly without GAs, though I do log in and correct whenever I see one- no I don't put OTs or cancel GAs as Henrik has suspicion (I don't know about whom though)- If some one has awarded a point.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 6)
Anonymous Poster
#8

Re: ID/OD controlled pipe

11/24/2009 3:53 AM

There are non standard pipes available and they are called pipe.

There are standard tubes available (ASTM/DIN/JIS)

The differences are not very clear except the usage and fitting.

The tubes (circular) typically has a slightly closer tolerance on OD to accommodate the fittings - the compression fittings do not act well to seal in case the tolerances are as wide as pipes.

The pipes do not have to accommodate the compression fittings and hence do not impose this restriction.

Eg Tube 1" will have a tolerance ±0.1mm on OD, for pipe it may be about 0.5mm

For 4" it is 0.38mm on tube , 0.8mm for pipe

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - Retired Piper

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bayonet Point, Florida
Posts: 635
Good Answers: 61
#15

Re: Pipe ID and Pipe OD

11/24/2009 5:56 PM

How often are we going to hear this same question and the multitude of incorrect answers and wild attempts at justifying the fuzzy logic of those incorrect answers.

The original poster asked (16 months age):

"Some pipes are denoted /described by ID & some by OD.

What is the idea behind this philosophy?"

Pipe is not denoted/described by the ID. Pipe is denoted by it's "Nominal" size. This goes for all sizes and in both imperial and metric designations. It just so happens that the pipes larger than 12" (imperial) have an Outside Diameter the same as the "Nominal" pipe size (NPS). All the other NPS sizes and all the metric sizes are identified by a metris Diameter Nominal (DN) size that do not actually correspond to the actual measurment. Please, as all of us older long time pipers have done, learn to accept it, you will not change it

Here are two questions (and my answers) related to this same question

Pipe vs. Tube

The question:

What is the difference between Pipe and Tubing?

My answer:

Tubing is normally "cold drawn" seamless with the O.D. the same as the size designation (i.e.: 1" inch tubing has an O. D. of 1 inch). You can get different pressure ratings of 1" tubing by changing the wall thickness. Thus the I. D. is smaller. Tubing normally comes in twenty foot lengths or in coils. Tubing is normally joined with compression type tubing fittings.

Pipe is made seamless or rolled and welded (sometimes referred to as ERW pipe). The pipe sizes up to 12' has a nominal size which is close but not the same as the actual O. D. Pipe in sizes 14" and larger have an O. D. the same as the nominal size. Both the seamless pipe and the ERW pipe come in different wall thicknesses depending on the pressure/temp criteria. Pipe normally comes in lengths called "single random" (20'+/-) or "double random" (40'+/-). ERW pipe is also furnished in very long lengths, spooled on large coils for pipeline needs. Pipe is normally joined using butt weld pipe fittings.

Pipe Sizes - NPS vs. metric

The question:

"How does nominal size relate to actual diameter?"

My answer:

Pipe sizes, along with the related pipe fittings, pipe flanges and valves are designated in both inches (NPS - Nominal Pipe Size) and metric units (DN - "Diameter Nominel").

Pipe is identified by "nominal" or "trade" names that are loosely related to actual dimensions. For instance, a 2-inch galvanized steel pipe has an inside diameter of about 2 1/8 inches and an outside diameter of about 2 5/8 inches. It is called "2-inch pipe" only for the sake of convenience.

There are the inch names for pipe products called NPS or "nominal pipe size" and their metric equivalents called DN or "diametre nominel". The metric designations conform to International Standards Organization (ISO) usage and apply to all plumbing, natural gas, heating oil, and miscellaneous piping used in buildings.

NPS

(inches)

DN

(mm)

1 25
2 50
3 80
4 100
6 150
8 200
10 250
12 300
14 350
16 400
18 450
20 500
22 550
24 600
26 650
28 700
30 750
32 800
__________________
Do it once and do it right
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#16
In reply to #15

Re: Pipe ID and Pipe OD

11/24/2009 6:42 PM

Where I come from, a simple question deserves a simple answer.

Thanks for giving us the anal retentive version.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 17 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Abdel Halim Galala (1); Anonymous Poster (7); Beej50 (1); lyn (4); PennPiper (1); Tornado (3)

Previous in Forum: What is the English Word for This Machining Activity?   Next in Forum: VALVE WITH DIFFERENT SCHEDULE AT BOTH END

Advertisement