Fastening, Joining & Assembly Blog

Fastening, Joining & Assembly

The Fastening, Joining and Assembly Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about fasteners and hardware, design for assembly, adhesives and sealants, and welding and joining technologies. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Roll-Up Your Television   Next in Blog: Could robots teach technical courses?
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Why Not Fabricate and Assemble 3D Parts in Space?

Posted December 16, 2010 7:00 AM

If 3D parts printers can be made to work in zero gravity, components for space stations, spacecraft, and even extraterrestrial colonies could be made in space, thereby saving significant dollars in launching finished components from earth. Made In Space also says that the mass of structures could be reduced by 30% since they don't have to withstand the vibrations and G-forces of a launch. Does this sound like a viable way to reduce the high costs of future space missions?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Fastening, Joining & Assembly, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Fastening, Joining & Assembly today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
2
Guru
Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: The 'Space Coast', USA
Posts: 11119
Good Answers: 918
#1

Re: Why Not Fabricate and Assemble 3D Parts in Space?

12/16/2010 7:52 AM

I think that there isn't much of a business case for doing that. Simply put, the number of "space missions" requiring that kind of hardware is not that huge nor is there a compelling reason to have a large number of space missions. At least for the foreseeable future.

The second problem is the huge startup costs to get something up and running the large operational costs to maintain it. We are just crawling in that domain with the Space Station. The leap to full-scale production facilities in low-earth orbit will require a lot more learnings than we currently have.

The third problem is that whatever the need is for low-earth orbit production, it will have to be a commercial venture, which means that it will have to generate a profit. Right now the only profit generating ventures in space are communication satellites and thrill rides to the edge of space.

Finally, as more commercial launch systems come online the cost of moving materials into low-earth orbit will decline, which works against the idea of orbital factories - for the foreseeable future.

Sadly, I wish we had a more compelling reason to explore and exploit space (beyond the ever expanding demand of texting), but our nation lacks the vision to drive us in any direction at all and the populous has little interest to ignite their imagination on the subject.

Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Optical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Trantor
Posts: 5363
Good Answers: 647
#2

Re: Why Not Fabricate and Assemble 3D Parts in Space?

12/16/2010 9:45 AM

If 3D parts printers can be made to work in zero gravity...

Well that's a pretty big if, isn't it? The ones I know about work using by selectively curing regions within a bath of liquid resin. It's kinda hard to hold down a bath of liquid resin in zero-g. And wouldn't just the cost of putting all that resin in orbit cost more that putting just the finished parts into orbit?

Using a version of the Navy electric rail gun that was discussed recently on CR4, finished parts could be launched into orbit pretty cheaply.

__________________
Whiskey, women -- and astrophysics. Because sometimes a problem can't be solved with just whiskey and women.
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: The 'Space Coast', USA
Posts: 11119
Good Answers: 918
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Why Not Fabricate and Assemble 3D Parts in Space?

12/16/2010 10:31 AM

Some of the advantages of low-earth orbit is that you can make a centrifuge that can produce any degree of gravity needed.

However, I just can't see a payoff for all the extra effort and cost unless the end product is something very exotic and of great value (here or outside the confines of Earth).

Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#4

Re: Why Not Fabricate and Assemble 3D Parts in Space?

12/17/2010 2:44 AM

"Science reporters" should be required to get the decimal point to within at most two places....

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Associate

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 42
Good Answers: 2
#5

Re: Why Not Fabricate and Assemble 3D Parts in Space?

12/17/2010 10:06 AM

There are 3D printers that build solid parts a layer at a time without a liquid vat, but the final parts are usually very weak and brittle, so are not suitable for use as a working part. Materials are constantly improving, though. Also, the energy requirements are significant, and would also result in a great deal of heat that would have to be dealt with.

Like others have said, there will have to be a financial benefit to building on site versus on earth.

Reply
Participant

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1
#6

Re: Why Not Fabricate and Assemble 3D Parts in Space?

12/23/2010 3:50 PM

The first thing that comes to mind is weight. A collection of finished parts would probably weigh less than the raw material needed to print it. Isn't weight one of the most important considerations in escaping Earth's gravity?

Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 12
Good Answers: 1
#7

Re: Why Not Fabricate and Assemble 3D Parts in Space?

04/28/2011 3:44 PM

If you could send up or process scrap into powdered aluminum, you have the right vacuum conditions to form and weld aluminum since there is no atmosphere to oxidize the weld. With the powdered aluminum, you might be able to focus the energy to grow the piece slowly rather than needing the instant mega-Btus of a furnace. Just exposing the powder to the sunny side should bring the temprature up to a few hundred degrees right off-the-bat.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Hero (2); cwdonoghue (1); Gary Viveiros (1); McTech (1); Tornado (1); Usbport (1)

Previous in Blog: Roll-Up Your Television   Next in Blog: Could robots teach technical courses?

Advertisement