Coatings & Surface Engineering Blog

Coatings & Surface Engineering

The Coatings & Surface Engineering is the place for conversation and discussion about coatings; substrate modifications; cleaning and surface preparation; and friction, lubrication and wear. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Are Nanocoatings the Future of Sustainable Surfaces?   Next in Blog: Too Many Regulations?
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Pilot Paint Program a Success?

Posted October 07, 2011 8:29 AM

Oregon's PaintCare Pilot program, started in July of 2010, has reported that its first year was a resounding success. The program established 95 collection sites that took in approximately 469,665 gallons of paint: the latex paint is recycled into new paint while the alkyd products are sent for fuel blending. Will Oregon's success inspire other states to take the paint recycling plunge? How would your company respond to a mandated "product stewardship" program?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Coatings & Surface Engineering, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Coatings & Surface Engineering today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#1

Re: Pilot Paint Program a Success?

10/07/2011 2:54 PM

One has to take any of these Oregon programs (my home state) with a grain of salt.

The loony left rules so anything they like is automatically declared a 'success' working - not working - an economic disaster - they are declared a success.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 859
Good Answers: 33
#2

Re: Pilot Paint Program a Success?

10/07/2011 11:55 PM

In Los Angeles County, when we have "Toxic Waste Collection Days" (Imagine latex paint being toxic??), we must stand in car lines for an hour, and allowed only 5 cans or so of old paint--The exhaust fumes alone will kill you, and they will not allow commercial companies to take part. NOW--If the purpose is to remove these materials from landfills, and the like, why do they put a limit on the amount, and why do the residential and commercial people become TWO? Just asking?? So the commercial guys, they take their old latex paint, roll out about 30 feet of 15# roofing felt (Black , I may add), leave it in the sun, pour the latex paint over it, leave it til hardened (water-based, remember), and roll the whole hardened mess up, and dispose of it as a solid. There--Problem solved, no laws broken, and the hypocrisy remains staggering..

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#3

Re: Pilot Paint Program a Success?

10/08/2011 9:12 AM

Um.......................HELLO!!!!

I'm guessing that the vast majority of this paint is latex. Drying latex paint gives off primarily water vapor as it dries, once dry it can be harmlessly tossed in the trash.

Now, these people must really think we're stupid.

This program has a $200,000 surplus, and is just soooo wonderful because the cost is built into the cost of paint. There's a name for this....................it's an over-burdensome, big nasty government..............ready................TAX!!!!!

Do they think we're supposed to feel special because they are able to invent new names for ways to steal our money?

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Pilot Paint Program a Success?

10/08/2011 11:54 AM

From the Oregon site:

This new law ties into the wider producer responsibility movement, in which Oregon is a national leader. Producer responsibility means manufacturers take responsibility for reducing the life cycle impacts of a product, including internalizing the end-of-life management costs, rather than having government set up and fund collection programs for waste products. The U.S. movement has resulted in 19 state electronics laws (including Oregon E-Cycles), seven state thermostat laws, one fluorescent lamp law, and several laws on batteries and auto switches.

As great as this sounds, much of US manufacturing is suffering. With the housing and construction market in the dumps, paint stores are not doing great either. Now they have been forced to become paint collection centers.

All of these laws make things much more expensive for both US manufacturers as well as consumers. Here's my next question: Are these laws forcing Chinese manufacturers to be responsible stewards of the planet, and take full responsibility for the products they produce through their entire life cycle?

Anybody want to bet that the answer is no, and that this only applies to US manufacturers.

Gee.....................Why can't we compete?

Fortunately, we've got the feds hard at work on these questions.

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Engineering Fields - Transportation Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Technical Fields - Procurement - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Architectural Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Marketing/Advertising - New Member Engineering Fields - Food Process Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mariposa Ca
Posts: 5800
Good Answers: 114
#5

Re: Pilot Paint Program a Success?

10/17/2011 9:51 AM

Latex paint probably isn't a problem

categorizing everything in a paint can the same way prevents "mistakes"

could you design a system that allowed latex, but prevented everything toxic form going to the landfill?

would it cost more or less than the present system?

who would pay?

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

C-Mac (1); Garthh (1); kramarat (2); russ123 (1)

Previous in Blog: Are Nanocoatings the Future of Sustainable Surfaces?   Next in Blog: Too Many Regulations?

Advertisement