Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition Blog

Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition

The Sports, Fitness, and Nutrition Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about topics related to sports and sports fitness, general fitness, bodybuilding, nutrition, weight loss, and human health. Here, you'll find everything from nutritional information and advice about healthy eating to training and exercise tips for improving your overall well-being.

Previous in Blog: March Madness   Next in Blog: The Verdict: Water vs. Sports Drinks
Close
Close
Close
11 comments

A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

Posted March 28, 2012 9:23 AM by HUSH

The Tour de France. The Olympics. Major League Baseball. All these events have one glaring black-eye for their prestigious athletes (no, not boredom). Doping.

Anabolic steroids are the most common form of performance enhancing drugs. Mimicking testosterone in the body, steroids are a catalyst for protein synthesis. While larger, quickly-rebuilt muscles are a distinct advantage in the sporting world, they are not the future of illegal supplementation. It is suspected that the new era of doping is coming, that of gene doping.

Right Arnie? ...via Vizyon Filmleri


The Australian company Genetic Testing Corp. offers a test to detect the gene ACTN3 which makes a type of fast-twitch protein essential for sprinters and other athletes who need explosive acceleration. This gene can also mutate into R577X, which makes the individual better suited for distance running than sprinting.

Rendered ACTN3...via Wikimedia

If DNA testing for these genes is already available, some scientists believe gene therapy isn't far behind. On some levels, gene doping has already been happening. Researchers have been able to deliver IGF-1, a pseudo-insulin producing gene that has significant anabolic effects in adults. By injecting the genes into an innocuous virus, the virus acts as the courier for the gene where it delivers it to the host cell.

Considerable risk is present for the doped athlete. Steroids often result in increased body hair and acne, a deeper voice, and if used extensively, damage to the body's natural attempts to repair damaged tissue. Gene therapy comes with other serious side effects. In 2002 and 2007, separate cases of children with x-linked severe combined immunodeficiency, or 'bubble-boy' syndrome, contracted leukemia after cells that did not contribute to their diseases were targeted in gene therapy. Furthermore, there is not a large enough sample to determine long-term adverse effects of gene doping which permanently changes a cell's DNA structure.

Gene therapy is no hope for this 2001 flop...

For the 2006 Olympics in Turin, Italy, IOC officials were concerned with the use of Repoxygen, which is a type of gene therapy that prompts the body's production of erythropoietin (EPO) when the body has insufficient oxygen supply. Creating more red blood cells to transport O2, EPO would be beneficial for a number of athletes.

Repoxygen--and gene therapy as a whole--are banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency. WADA, headquartered in Montreal, oversees the PED use in many international competitions and helps private leagues, like the NFL, NHL and FIFA, establish doping protocol. WADA specifically prohibits gene doping:

"The non-therapeutic use of cells, genes, genetic elements, or of the modulation of gene expression, having the capacity to enhance athletic performance, is prohibited."

Testing for gene doping, until about 18 months ago, proved difficult. It was originally thought that it would only be possible to determine gene doping through an expensive gene transfer test. WADA invested $1 million to investigate gene doping tests. In late 2010 (blah blah blah, old news, got ya), German scientists developed a way to differentiate transgenic DNA from the natural DNA of a person. Gene doping can now be done with simple blood tests.

Pictured: German scientists...via Pitt Ren

Yet, that does little to discourage potential cheaters. Typical PEDs are widely measurable, yet athletes continue to use them. Gene doping, let alone gene doping tests, are less common. The so called 'money leagues'--professional sports with extreme revenues and salaries (MLB, NFL, EPL)--do not investigate gene doping, and their athletes are the most apt to afford such measures.

Where does that leave the future of athletic equality? In the hands of the athlete-- the same as it has always been. Ruthless competitors are always looking for that physical edge; that one trait that sets them a bar above. Just as the spectators desire a balance in an athletic competition, the athletes have a balance themselves: cheat and gain glory for themselves and their country, or get caught and ruin a reputation forever. I think we should ask Barry Bonds what he thinks.

Or maybe not...via MLB

Resources

Science Daily - Gene Doping Detectable

Wikipedia - Repoxygen; WADA

WADA & The 2008 Prohibited List

Vizard, Frank, and Robert Lipsyte. Why a Curveball Curves. ; The Incredible Science of Sports. 2009. Print.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".
Guru

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wolfe Island, ON
Posts: 1357
Good Answers: 109
#1

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/28/2012 10:48 PM

I am all for persecuting and prosecuting cheating athletes as stiff as the rules permit. I have absolutely no admiration for cheats in any sport. It is a bad message to send to kids and an unfair advantage I would never have allowed my kids to do it to get a foot up. I am a parent of grown children who did excel at track and soccer. High school kids for the most part are not involved as far as I knew. It was when my daughters entered university that they first encountered testing for drugs and they were tested many times. Bigger problems were in some of the more prestige sports that could earn money; football, hockey, and even baseball. My kids were aware of some sports using drugs but managed to keep their heads down.

It keeps getting scarier as we enter into genetic modification of elite athletes. It is good to know testing is making good strides to keep up. if it gets worse, maybe the athletes will work themselves into their own open sports field. While the purist can remain drug free and genetically natural in a whole different run at sports. I think people will realize the cheat athletes are not worth watching or else they will be soon watching robotic Olympics.

__________________
If they want holy water, tell them to boil the hell out of it.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#2

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/28/2012 11:48 PM

I think they should form a second line of sports similar to how the old tractor pulls have the stock class and a modified class.

Let the goons in the modified sports class just go absolutely nuts! Believe me I am in no way a sports fan but I would happily watch some super roid blasting super freak try and bench press the rear end of a Greyhound bus every time or toss bowling balls around like they are baseballs.

How about cyclists that can do smoky burnouts with 0 - 60 times comparable to most street legal sports cars!

Oh ya I would pay to watch that stuff!

Reply
2
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 135
Good Answers: 7
#3

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 12:17 AM

Somebody already attempted to create the perfect master race.... we all know how well that turned out.

Look up eugenics in history. A worldwide scientific and political movement to genetically create better humans. Disaster.

Listen to the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger. She founded the organization to "assist the race toward the elimination of the unfit.". She didn't have genetic manipulation available to her, so she, and her followers, advocated a policy which aimed to improve human hereditary traits through social intervention by reducing reproduction by those considered unfit. Sanger's eugenic policies included an exclusionary immigration policy, free access to birth control methods and full family planning autonomy for the able-minded, and compulsory segregation or sterilization for the profoundly retarded.

Humans seem to have the attitude that because we 'can' do something, we should.

It seems that whenever mankind gets mixed up with trying to improve on nature, it almost always goes badly. We can't even manage national parks without messing it up. Remember when we prevented forest fires, causing massive wildfires because we forced the buildup of dry fuel. Remember when we killed all the wolves, letting the deer and elk have a population explosion? How many species of ground nesting birds have we caused to go extinct by destroying their habitat by protecting the deer herds in the northeastern United States? How many environmental disasters have we caused by introducing invasive species? Why do we think that we can predict and control the outcomes when we start messing around with human DNA?

Don't get me wrong, I am not opposed to genetic research and manipulation when we are trying to cure diseases. That research has a noble, focused, and limited application. That seems to me to be a worthy cause for research, and experimentation, while we are learning the practical possibilities, and dangers, of genetic manipulation. Watson and Crick came up with the first, and, correct double helix model of DNA in 1953, less than 60 years ago. While the human genome project was essentially complete in 2003, the last chromosome mapping wasn't published until 2006, less than 6 years ago. We haven't had enough experience with human DNA to say that we understand and know how to safely change it. DNA is extremely big and complex, there just hasn't been enough time and study to say we fully understand it.

I understand that human DNA is not static. It has been mutating for many, many thousands of years, and will continue to do so. I just don't think that human knowledge is at a point that we can change anything we want without unintended consequences, possibly dangerous ones.

I know that there is a lot of money and ego involved with professional sports, but, improved athletic performance seems, to me, too frivolous of an undertaking when we still don't understand fully what we are doing. But, as they say, you can't put the genie back in the bottle, so, I am also sure that someone will ignore caution, and do it anyway.

Individuals may be smart, but, people are dumb.

__________________
It gets interesting when you put fuel and oxygen in the same molecule, without allowing them to react, YET!
Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#4
In reply to #3

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 6:52 AM

So you wouldn't watch the 'Super modified class' Olympics where all the participants look like characters out of the DC and Marvel comics or refugees from the Island of Dr Moroe?

I want to see a Grasshopper man take the long jump deep into the 100 meter range and a Cheetahgirl do the mile in under a minute 30!

How about a 900 pound Gorrilaman bench pressing the back end of that bus I mentioned earlier? You wouldn't watch that?

What if the Canadian hockey team looked like a bunch of 8 ft tall Wookies? No go there either?

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#5
In reply to #4

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 9:00 AM

No rules cage fighting?

That would be cool!

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 135
Good Answers: 7
#6
In reply to #4

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 11:59 AM

Those might be amusing events, but, they suffer the same fault as 'reality' TV. I don't know these people and I have a hard time giving a F#%^.

Strangely, I got hooked on Australian Rules Football several years ago. It's the only sport that I'll watch. Footy coverage is devilishly hard to come by in the United States. Even the AFL official web site is out of date about coverage in North America, now the NAB Cup series is over and the main Premiership season is under way. Last year, I could at least get replays on ESPN3 (streaming). If you want to see real athletes in action go to http://www.afl.com.au/ then scroll down and look at the galleries. Photos from the week's matches. When you look at the marking contests, keep in mind that these are 2 M+ tall men jumping over each other. The players tackle each other with no padding, play for 80 minutes with no time outs or huddles, and with 18 players on the field and only 4 subs, everybody is always running. They even have a 'blood rule" if you're bleeding, you have to leave the field, but they don't stop play for you to get out of the way.

I'm looking forward to the last 'Saturday in September', GRAND FINAL.

__________________
It gets interesting when you put fuel and oxygen in the same molecule, without allowing them to react, YET!
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
CR4 Admins - CR4 Admin - CR4 Admin Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member United States - Member - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Crime Alley, Gotham City
Posts: 715
Good Answers: 10
#7
In reply to #6

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 1:12 PM

At your behest Lapin, I watched some AFL highlights on Youtube and also read the rules of gameplay. Some of its finer points miss me, but I did just see a guy literally stand on top of an opponent's shoulders to catch a ball, so I appreciate that. I think there could be some interesting content there for this blog as well.

__________________
HUSH
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 135
Good Answers: 7
#9
In reply to #7

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 2:25 PM

One of the things that I like about Footy is,

  • A player is running at full speed across the field,
  • He's 50 meters away from the goal posts (the semicircular line on the field),
  • He drops the ball and kicks it at an angle 90 degrees away from his direction of travel.
  • He kicks it between the goal posts,
  • The ball stays high above anybody's reach,
  • All that time, there is a very large man trying to catch and tackle him usually from behind
  • And, He never slows down.

While running with the ball for more than about 15 meters, they have to touch the ball on the ground. They have the option to dribble the ball instead (most do). This isn't a round ball like a basketball or soccer ball, it's a football, just like in american football. YES, They dribble a football while running at full speed.

When a player catches the ball, they have about 10 seconds free from interference, to dispose if the ball. After that, the referee blows his whistle, calls play on, and then they become fair game. Only when the ball goes out of bounds, or a score is made, do they stop the clock. However there is someone somewhere who adds up all that idle time, and adds it to the last quarter. There's no shirking, they play the full 80 minutes.

They play footy on the local cricket grounds, during the off season. The fields are not all the same size, sort of like baseball fields in the U.S., every one is different. Footy just has minimum field sizes in the rules. I think they're at least 100 yards wide and more than one hundred something long.

They only score 1 or 6 points at a time, and frequently the winning score is over 100 points.

__________________
It gets interesting when you put fuel and oxygen in the same molecule, without allowing them to react, YET!
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kansas, USA
Posts: 748
Good Answers: 64
#11
In reply to #3

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 3:06 PM

GA Lapin,

There is so much we don't understand about how we as mankind are composed and to screw around with what we don't understand we are asking for trouble.

The reason why people are willing to do whatever it takes to succeed in sports is because they, like so many people in society, have a very short-term perspective in life. They have an immediate gratification mindset without looking at what the long-term ramifications are.

I don't necessarily agree with your statement that "human DNA is not static. It has been mutating for many, many thousands of years." Maybe it isn't mutating. Maybe we are just learning more of the existing complexity as we gain greater scientific and technological abilities.

__________________
One of the greatest discoveries a man makes, one of his great surprises, is to find he can do what he was afraid he couldn't do. Ford, Henry
Reply
Guru
Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale Florida
Posts: 5708
Good Answers: 123
#8

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 1:40 PM

Genetic engineering is already taking place in some countries. There is no way a normal person with a five fingered hand, and a wrist limited to less than 360 movement can install or remove some of the components on current automobiles.

I have it from a reliable source that as we speak now, Lyn-Door Industries is finalizing a prototype arm with three fingers, and dual wrists.

__________________
Bob
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 135
Good Answers: 7
#10
In reply to #8

Re: A Genetically Perfect Athlete?

03/29/2012 2:31 PM

Don't forget to mention the patent pending Lyn-Door Industries, semi-clenched, auto-lubing, automatic pumping motion mode.

__________________
It gets interesting when you put fuel and oxygen in the same molecule, without allowing them to react, YET!
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Reply to Blog Entry 11 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

bob c (1); facilitiesmgr (1); HUSH (1); kevinm (1); kramarat (1); Lapin (4); tcmtech (2)

Previous in Blog: March Madness   Next in Blog: The Verdict: Water vs. Sports Drinks

Advertisement