Defense & Security Technology Blog

Defense & Security Technology

The Defense & Security Technology Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about materials; communications & surveillance; electrical/electronic components; and design & assembly. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Modern Security Consulting   Next in Blog: Engineers Save the World--June 6, 1944
Close
Close
Close
26 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Designing the Clink

Posted October 30, 2013 9:19 AM by HUSH
Pathfinder Tags: design prison security

Fun (read: depressing) fact, there are 2.2 million individuals incarcerated in various federal, state and county prisons around the United States, the country with the highest incarceration rate in the world (about 0.7% of its population). This number is somewhat maligned due to the fact that the United States hands out some of the lengthiest sentences when compared to similar countries, but what this really means is that incarceration is big business.

Someone has to feed and transport these inmates. Other people have to ensure healthcare. And of course, a team of architects and engineers have to build the prison. It's not as simple as building some walls and a roof and throwing a bunch of felons in it. Despite being stupid enough to lead a criminal life (or stupid enough to get caught, if that's how you want to look at it), criminals are some of the most enterprising individuals in the modern workforce. They're not willing to take 'no' for an answer, they're willing to think outside of the box for a solution, and in an unfortunate number of instances they have the conviction to cross legal and ethical boundaries to get the job done.

Hollywood has a way of making it seems as though escaping is as simple as some combination of running, digging, crawling and hiding. Right George Clooney? Right Tim Robbins? Right Clint Eastwood?

But it's never quite how Hollywood portrays it, and it's up to the architects and structural engineers to conceive of every possible prison infrastructure flaw which an inmate can use to his or her advantage. And since those Martha Stewart blue-collar prisons are boring, and perhaps better than your desk job, let's take a look at how designers keep the crud behind bars.

The Cell

First of all, it's been years since prisons have been constructed with bars. While some are still in use, full-sized steel doors are preferred. It prevents corrections officers from being grabbed or having things thrown at them. And while it's a cliché for an inmate to obtain a file by it being baked into a cake, hacksaws and other filing implements have been used, even recently, to shear bars and foundation. The locks to the door are wired to a central hub, meaning that officers are not in danger of losing physical keys. And the locks used are often custom engineered using computerized milling techniques. It's also become common practice to install windows in cells that are very thin and at the top of the cell wall. This way, inmates cannot see other parts of the prison, the ground, or anything else which they could use to determine orientation.

With the exception of a toilet and sink, cell furniture is made out of poured concrete. This makes it nearly impossible to break or move. Plumbing components, such as those made by Acorn Engineering, are manufactured of heavy-gage stainless steel which has a working load of 2,500 lb. The fixtures are made via seamless welding so there are no crevices to hide contraband.

To escape directly from the cell, prisons often opt for tunneling. Many newer prisons use precast concrete for exterior walls. Whenever possible, chases made for piping and HVAC run vertically, so even if the inmate found the hollow part of the wall and tunneled through, he or she can only go up or down. If at all possible, cells are located away from exterior walls altogether.

The Prison

First, prisons are almost always arranged in a campus-like, decentralized pattern. Each cell block will have its own set of showers, recreation areas, and dining halls. Even if a prison riot were to break out, it makes it much more likely to include only a fraction of the prison population. (Side note: some American universities constructed in the 1960s and 1970s also utilize this design method.)

Wide floor plans in cell blocks offer favorable visibility to guards, and in the event guards need to physically intervene they ensure that a group of them does not become overwhelmed in a close-quarters melee. Many designs up until he 1990s were inspired by Panopticon, which was a circular prison envisioned by Jeremy Bentham way back in 1786. Many cells would be placed around the perimeter of the circle, and a central guard tower would offer sightlines into each cell. The inmates wouldn't be able to definitely tell they were being watched. Cuba's Presidio Modelo was the closest rendition to Panopticon ever constructed, but many prisons utilized an elevated guard station so one or two guards could keep an active watch on dozens of inmates. Once surveillance cameras became a practical solution, such guard stations became less important.

Outside of the prison, 12-feet-high electric fences topped with razor wire guard the prison perimeter. Interspaced with the fence are watch towers, as well as one or two gates. Most of the electric fences are simply uncomfortable to the touch, but others are known as "stun lethal" fences and once a person touches to fence a second time the fence electrifies the individual. The fences may be equipped with vibration monitors to alert guards in nearby towers. Since the threat of being sprung from the outside can be as menacing as a break out, anti-collision rails and bulletproof panels can be placed along the fence as well. Don't forget, many high security prisons are placed in adverse locations. The three men who escaped Alcatraz are believed to have drowned in San Francisco Bay. Florence ADX, the United States' highest security level prison which hosts 9/11 terrorists, the Unabomber, and treasonists, is located in an unincorporated area of the Rocky Mountains. Even if a prisoner gets past the fence, they're not free yet.


There are many design considerations for modern high-security prisons. There used to be a TV show on Fox called Prison Break in which a structural engineer uses his knowledge to spring his brother from jail. If we were to build a CR4 penitentiary, who would be in it? And how long it would take some of our users to burrow out?

Resources

LA Times - Prison design faces judgement

Wikipedia - Panopticon

Betafence USA - Modular Security Fencing

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#1

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 1:54 AM

That combination toilet, sink and (drinking?) water fountain fitting couldn't possibly meet the most basic sanitary separation requirements.

That's cruel and unusual in my books.

__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Reply
Power-User
Canada - Member -  Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamburg NY (just south of buffalo) pre-Hamburg(1998) home was the Yukon territory of Canada
Posts: 486
Good Answers: 27
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 6:17 AM

If you are in prison you were convicted of violating basic human rights and privileges so removing some of the niceties of civilization is fair and just. If I had any say there would be no TV. no exercise/socialization, nothing, just 4 walls and a toilet. Water to drink would be delivered with meals only(minimum required to sustain).As a prisoner you should have NO rights or privileges as you have chosen to disregard the same of others.

__________________
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 6:28 AM

As a prisoner you should have NO rights or privileges as you have chosen to disregard the same of others.

Mostly agree but not all prisoners are incarcerated for that reason.

Stark conditions are one thing, unhealthy conditions are another.

__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 732
Good Answers: 17
#11
In reply to #1

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 8:51 PM

A lot of countries have those very fixtures, just not in easy to maintain stainless steel! It's called penalware, anyway. My 1/2 bath in Japan had one. I have been a facility manager at small100 bed facilities, and larger 5,000 bed facilities. It ain't so bad!

__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Member United States - Member - Army Vet in the aviation industry

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bridgewater, Va.
Posts: 2175
Good Answers: 119
#4

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 8:44 AM

I still like the idea (I think it was a premise of a Heinlein book) that we fence off a very large section of Montana and just toss in convicted felons to fend for themselves with no chance of release.

Of course, with the new shale oil mining that idea is probably no longer feasible.

Hooker

Reply
Power-User
Canada - Member -  Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamburg NY (just south of buffalo) pre-Hamburg(1998) home was the Yukon territory of Canada
Posts: 486
Good Answers: 27
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 8:56 AM

Perhaps we can copy the movie "Escape from NewYork". No-one will really miss Manhattan island and it already has a good population of criminals.......

__________________
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 12:22 PM

The Brits tried that one some 200 years ago. They called it New South Wales. Huge moat all around it.

__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Member United States - Member - Army Vet in the aviation industry

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Bridgewater, Va.
Posts: 2175
Good Answers: 119
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 2:03 PM

In 1970 I went to a Tom Jone's dinner party in the old goal in Sydney, deep in the bowels of the building with huge stone block walls and iron bars.

However it started, it was fun for me.

Hooker

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 732
Good Answers: 17
#12
In reply to #4

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 8:52 PM

That's called Australia...

__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Phnom Penh
Posts: 4019
Good Answers: 102
#14
In reply to #12

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 1:18 AM
__________________
Difficulty is not an obstacle it is merely an attribute.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8006
Good Answers: 286
#8

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 4:28 PM

Now if we could only design courthouses that would insure judges would be fair and impartial, and that attorneys on both sides acted honestly and with integrity....

.

...yeah, right.

__________________
Eternal vigilance is the price of knowledge. - George Santayana
Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancleave, Ms about 30 miles inland from Biloxi and the coast
Posts: 3197
Good Answers: 106
#9

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 6:10 PM

Devils Island was a good concept. Alcatraz was one of the best secure prisons around. The concept that prisons are for rehabilitation inmates is totally wrong. Inmates learn more bad things than good things. A prison should be for punishment The prison experience should be: Prison is so horrific that, "I don't ever want to take a chance and get sent back." If you have seen the TV shows like "Locked up Abroad"; that is enough incentive to stay on the straight and narrow. I think that sheriff down in New Mexico or Arizona has the right idea. I don't recall the name. To some, prison is like a vacation. There should not be any privileges for anyone like politicians or famous personalities. They should all receive the same treatment.

__________________
Mr.Ron from South Ms.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 581
Good Answers: 15
#10

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 6:39 PM

Those of you glorying in your freedom and superiority over the riff-raff behind bars need to keep in mind a couple things: misguided "three strikes" laws that put truly petty criminals behind bars for decades; and the mentally ill, for whom prison ends up being the safest place... for them and us.

Both classes would be better served, and society would too, with something other than max security lock-ups.

(That's not to say there are no truly defective humans who need to be caged, literally.)

__________________
Ignorance is no sin. Willful ignorance is unforgiveable.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 732
Good Answers: 17
#13

Re: Designing the Clink

10/31/2013 8:57 PM

Oh gawd...don't let Hollywood be your source on intelligent information! How may escapes from GTMO? None...not even close. Most of it depends on the guards/staff not the facility.

__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8006
Good Answers: 286
#15
In reply to #13

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 4:16 AM

Aw...you can't compare GTMO to our prisons. GTMO is a detention camp that falls outside US legal jurisdiction and definitely not a prison. A prison would be within US legal jurisdiction, so it definitely can't be a prison.

__________________
Eternal vigilance is the price of knowledge. - George Santayana
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 732
Good Answers: 17
#21
In reply to #15

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 11:51 AM

I can compare them, having worked at both. GTMO's camps are structurally modeled after an existing US state penitentiary.

That's how they got built so fast. The design was already completed.

The reason people are there is not a function which defines the structure. The structure is indifferent.

GTMO is defined as a detention facility. Still, there have been no escapes...nothing even close.

__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8006
Good Answers: 286
#25
In reply to #21

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 12:38 PM

I blame myself;

.

If you didn't make a distinction between GTMO and regular prisons, it was unreasonable for me to expect you to distinguish satire from a regular comment.

__________________
Eternal vigilance is the price of knowledge. - George Santayana
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8006
Good Answers: 286
#16

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 4:27 AM

Those of you calling for harsh punishment and zero rights for prisoners on the grounds that they have not respected the rights of others should take a moment to reconsider.

.

Less than 10% of those in federal prison are incarcerated for violent crimes. The huge swell in incarceration since 1980 has been largely due to minimum sentencing requirements which give the judge no room to do his job. You might have a hard time determining exactly how other people had their rights violated by the crimes many are incarcerated for.

.

Conditions should be dictated by cost, but not to a degree that it is unsafe and unhealthy. Trying to specify conditions that are aren't just frugal, but instead serve to present some real hardship to prisoners is kind of sadistic.

__________________
Eternal vigilance is the price of knowledge. - George Santayana
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User
Canada - Member -  Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamburg NY (just south of buffalo) pre-Hamburg(1998) home was the Yukon territory of Canada
Posts: 486
Good Answers: 27
#17
In reply to #16

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 5:29 AM

3 strikes law is fine as it is. If the time served was as I stated before there would be fewer repeat offenders. Yes there have been more incarcerations for petty crimes BUT they still commited a crime.

Where does the 10% stat. come from? From the criminal lists I've seen the percentage is closer to 80% in the Maximum security facilities.

__________________
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8006
Good Answers: 286
#18
In reply to #17

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 7:26 AM

The <10% statistic comes from reality. You may reference it on page 33, here.

.

In 2009, less than 15,000 of more than 187,000 federal prisoners were sentenced for violent crimes.

.

I also note that you, like much of the public, confuse the 3 strikes law, with other sentencing mandates. I never mentioned 3 strikes law, though I still think a judge should be able to make a decision on the merits of the case. What I did mention was minimum sentencing guidelines, which give the judge no room to perform a vital function.

.

As far as people committing crimes....yes, most of the people that go to prison are not wrongly convicted (IMHO), but a good portion are.

.

Moreover, it would be a rare individual who has not committed a crime. The federal code has so many crimes that there is no longer a running count, so it would be foolish to claim you hadn't....and since ignorance of the law is no defense... shouldn't we just suspend your rights until you can prove to us that you haven't committed enough crimes for us to lock you away?

.

After all, however well mannered you are today, chances are still good that you have committed crimes in the past.

__________________
Eternal vigilance is the price of knowledge. - George Santayana
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User
Canada - Member -  Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamburg NY (just south of buffalo) pre-Hamburg(1998) home was the Yukon territory of Canada
Posts: 486
Good Answers: 27
#19
In reply to #18

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 9:01 AM

I fully agree on the percentage of incarcerations at ALL 5 levels of federal detention centers.

Per my previous postings I'm only refering to the Maximum Security prisons.

In the report you referenced they have separated out burglary,fraud and weapons charges. Add those in and you are closer to 40% of total incarcerations.

I agree sentencing time should be variable based on the crime.

No,I have never broken a law that would land me in Maximum security.

__________________
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8006
Good Answers: 286
#20
In reply to #19

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 11:50 AM

We seem to be in agreement on the important points.

.

It is just in the little stuff our opinions seem to vary....

.

....I agree with you that burglary probably warrants inclusion as a violent crime. Weapons charges however, considering the prisoners are classified by the most severe charge (meaning they didn't threaten or attempt to harm anyone with a weapon), lack the strong indication that the person was prepared to physically harm someone. Fraud is certainly not a violent crime.

.

As far as knowing with certainty you have never broken a law that would result in doing hard time, how could you possibly be certain? The Congressional Research Service has admitted it is no longer able to provide an accurate number of exactly how many federal crimes there are. Even worse, some of the crimes reference laws of foreign countries.....

.

'... 16 U.S.C. Section 3370 makes it a federal offense for any person to "import, export, transport, sell, receive, acquire, or purchase any fish or wildlife or plant taken, possessed, transported, or sold in violation of any law, treaty, or regulation of the United States or in violation of any Indian tribal law or regulation of any state or any foreign law.....'

.

In the end, breaking a law is not a requirement for going to prison. There have been numerous people who have been later exonerated of the crimes that sent them to prison...some even on death row.

__________________
Eternal vigilance is the price of knowledge. - George Santayana
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 732
Good Answers: 17
#22
In reply to #18

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 11:55 AM

It's not the function of the DOC to determine the wrongness or rightness of why the detainee or prisoner is there. People are incarcerated by the legal system. The care and feeding of those individuals cannot be meted out on an individual basis.

If a guard starts treating someone special, worst case scenario, the guard and/or the individual ends up dead.

Again, not in the decision matrix.

__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 732
Good Answers: 17
#23

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 11:58 AM

This conversation has degraded into prisoner and detainee rights.

This conversation is supposed to be about prison design (engineering an escape-proof prison).

Let's stay on topic.

__________________
common knowledge...less common than common sense
Reply
Power-User
Canada - Member -  Member

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hamburg NY (just south of buffalo) pre-Hamburg(1998) home was the Yukon territory of Canada
Posts: 486
Good Answers: 27
#24
In reply to #23

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 12:17 PM

Sorry...my bad.

My original point being only having inmates of Maximum security prisons in cell's (think isolation)there is less places to secure.(no yards/community halls,no opportunity for planning with other inmates).

__________________
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 8006
Good Answers: 286
#26
In reply to #24

Re: Designing the Clink

11/01/2013 5:05 PM

Did you know that a very effective way to make a vicious, dangerous dog, is simply to minimize/eliminate socialization and contact with other animals/people?

.

It wouldn't be too far of a stretch to think that long term solitary confinement could have similar effects.

.

I understand if you don't believe in the concept of rehabilitation or any attempt to make it more probable the prisoner will reenter society in a positive way.... but making a person worse during incarceration certainly can not be helpful if the goal is truly to have less crime.

__________________
Eternal vigilance is the price of knowledge. - George Santayana
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 26 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Hooker (2); lonster (5); Lynn.Wallace (1); ronseto (1); The.Tinkerer (6); truth is not a compromise (7); Wal (4)

Previous in Blog: Modern Security Consulting   Next in Blog: Engineers Save the World--June 6, 1944

Advertisement