Engineering...Beyond the Classroom Blog

Engineering...Beyond the Classroom

The Engineering...Beyond the Classroom Blog focuses on engineering issues that are important to students and faculty regarding educational. Converse about educational or research technologies, tools of the student or teacher trade, curriculum and coursework, or myriad other topics that turn bright students into brilliant engineers.

Previous in Blog: Overcoming Inertia: Inhibitions and Anxiety of Using Technology in the Classroom (Part 2)   Next in Blog: Overcoming Inertia: Inhibitions and Anxiety of Using Technology in the Classroom (Part 4)
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Overcoming Inertia: Inhibitions and Anxiety of Using Technology in the Classroom (Part 3)

Posted November 04, 2008 6:00 AM by ShakespeareTheEngineer

So far, this blog has surveyed some of the more common reasons why educators tend to avoid using technology in and out of the classroom. Part 1 gave some background and basic psychology. Part 2 investigated the first of five of those misconceptions.

In this part, I will continue on to the second of those five and look at those teachers who feel incapable or overwhelmed by what seems to be a constantly changing technological landscape.

Misconception #2 - I Can't (Don't Want to) Learn How to Do It.

Chances are, you already DO know how to use a lot of the technology presented here in The Whiteboard Jungle. One truth about learning new technology that is often overlooked, however, is the similarity of common programs. If you can use Microsoft Word, you can also use PowerPoint and FrontPage to an extent, because most of the commands and menus are the same. The same is true of the product line offered by Adobe (DreamWeaver, Photoshop, etc.). And you can easily lean on others when you can't figure it out for yourself. Technology just takes some practice, like the use of any educational tool. This is often one of the reasons that educators shy away, because confronting your own shortcomings with something is hard to do in a world where you are often expected to have all the answers to everything.

Companies Want You to Know How to Use It

Personally, when I want to learn a program, I just play around with it until I figure it out and get the basic gist. I don't have computer training beyond this, so I mean that a common teacher can use this strategy, if motivated. When I am stuck, I ask colleagues who might know. When I am really stuck, I ask kids. The more programs I learn how to use, the easier I find that it is to learn new ones, because I am not jumping from web development programs to computer aided design (C.A.D.), to advanced statistical analysis software. What I use stays near my domain, which includes media, information collecting, writing, and presentation. There are only so many ways that you can approach these areas as technology develops. Having programs that are familiar to a person's previous knowledge base and skill set improves marketability. Hence, it pays for companies to create new programs operate similar to old/popular ones, with improvements and enhanced features.

Avoiding the Unknown is Natural

Trying something out of the ordinary can seem overwhelming, especially with all of the other demands on an educator's (or parent's) time. But the reality is that students are going to be expected to handle technology when they graduate from both high school and college. If you think time is an issue, be sure to read Part 2.

Pushing yourself to improve and learn new technology bridges that gap and shows students that the common mantra of being a "life-long learner" is not simply a tag line that adults throw around. If they can learn it, so can you! And as you learn new technology, you may find that collaborating with students can be some of the most exciting learning that can be had – by both students and educators alike.

Next Blog: Some students don't have access to technology at home so how can we expect them to do it?

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1149
Good Answers: 36
#1

Re: Overcoming Inertia: Inhibitions and Anxiety of Using Technology in the Classroom (Part 3)

11/04/2008 10:01 AM

The more I read these 'excuses' to why teachers can't use technology, the more similar these excuses are to why students don't always do their homework. The more excuses these teachers try to find to not implement technology, the more they sound like students.

I believe that just trying something new is half the battle. Often enough, trying gets you very far in learning programs. I am astonished at how many people still don't know how to use programs like PowerPoint or Excel. They are time-saving tools that need to be implemented and taught in the classroom.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 927
Good Answers: 56
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Overcoming Inertia: Inhibitions and Anxiety of Using Technology in the Classroom (Part 3)

11/05/2008 2:31 AM

I was once hired by the State dept of Education to manage one County's part of a statewide effort to bring some technology proficiency into the classroom.

The program was already in the last year of a five year state funding when I was brought in.

It's important to recognize that I am not an educator in the traditional sense. While I have designed and conducted hundreds of classes for engineers and architects, that was a completely different environment from your generic public or private grade and high school.

I was hired by on the strength of my success in providing training programs for many firms on Wall Street. The programs covered the gamut from Word processing to spread sheets and then some.

Once in the school I spent the first week traveling throughout the county talking to school administrators and teachers to see what was wanted and needed.

It soon became apparent that the program had stagnated and was viewed by the teachers in the County with a stifled yawn.

The reason for the failure to attract teachers was rooted in the fact that whomever had designed the programs had modeled them after a common paradigm: students take a course. They complete the course and then move on to the next course. A fresh body of students moves in, takes the same course and then they too move on, in a continuous cycle that is familiar to all, I am sure.

Such repetitive iterations of the same subject might work in a classroom where an never ending stream of new students can be counted on next semester.

However, to impliment the same menu of computer courses twice a year for four years in a county with less than 300 teachers was wrong. It should have come as no surprise to anyone when teachers refused to take the classes again, in spite of the incentives. It was simply boring!

What complicated matters further was that different teachers in different schools have different after school responsibilities which start and end at different times. Scheduling classes for a County wide population with diverse scheduling requirements was a frustrating balancing act. Asking teachers to drive to another school to take the courses complicated things further.

Our state mandates that teachers be able to show 100(?) hours of continuing professional development over a five year period if they expect to keep their state certification as teachers and computer programs gave such credits. Still we could not attract the teaching population.

I completely revamped the computer curriculum's, pulled back on the MS Office products that had dominated the schedule and grabbed at anything that looked different. The programs were designed from the onset to be fun!

Whereas 2D drafting with AutoCAD had dominated the CAD environment, I brought in Solidworks and Pro Engineer and had the teachers using it.

The nurses in the school who are rarely if ever included in these activities found themselves with an opportunity to learn how to use software specific to keeping and transferring student health records, from their school to the next, an activity involving sensitive information and ripe for law suits if not done correctly.

Gym teachers played with programs that facilitated exercise regimens and calculated calorie burns. Power point became a teaching instrument for football players to learn complex plays on the field.

The theater group joined with other CAD students and used Solidworks to model the school theater and auditorium and plan in advance how sets occupied space and how they were seen from different seats in the theater.

Science teachers found Solidworks useful for everything from demonstrating mass properties to observing complex dynamic kinematic devices. Showing FEA programs and animated stress models with gradient colors added a dramatic Wow! factor to teachers and students alike. Solid modeling and FEA in high school? Yes!

Students in an advanced microbiology class learned how to make 3D models of chemical components and then assembled them in a DNA helix, an exercise that had everyone giggling it was so much fun.

Another thing I learned was to schedule classes for teachers separately from administrators. Some people need to look good in front of others. Some are fearful of looking bad. Keeping teachers in one class and administrators in another made for a much more relaxed tone. Administrators who wouldn't be caught dead raising their hands in front teachers, became quite engaged when in a room populated only with other administrators.

Some teachers were also intimidated by the simple fact that many of their students were dramatically more advanced than they and carefully avoided the use of the PC's in the classrooms for this reason. These individuals often had to be coached in private. Not sure how to deal with that.

When the grant program funding my activities ended, I was disappointed and so were the many schools who supported the program.

I have always enjoyed learning and continue to bring that passion to all my activities which are predominantly mechanical design. This opportunity to help develop a learning environment for teachers was an anomaly and completely inconsistent with my normal activities. That made it all the more exciting for me.

As with all things human, the omnipresent "investment factor" will keep the older generation teachers stuck. Until they see that the rewards for giving up their comfort level is far greater than staying stuck.

Unfortunately, their exists in far too many systems an adversarial environment being unions and administration and I often found that the biggest challenge was negotiating the land mines without stepping on one. When the job was over, I didn't miss that for one minute.

If I were asked to identify the single biggest problem affecting teachers and their ability use computers, I would look first at the climate in which they work and eliminate those factors that drain their psyche and love of teaching. With that out of the way, helping them to use computers in the classroom will be a no-brainer and their own passion for learning rejuvenated!

I attribute this success to a number if factors. I suspect however, that aside from my own native enthusiasm was that I was the "odd man" in the school and brought a new perspective. I saw things that others could have seen had they not been part of the conventional educational paradigm.

L. J.

__________________
"Both the revolutionary and the creative individual are perpetual juveniles. The revolutionary does not grow up because he cannot grow, while the creative individual cannot grow up because he keeps growing." Eric Hoffer
Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Education - Seasoned Vet in the Classroom United States - Member -

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 760
Good Answers: 19
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Overcoming Inertia: Inhibitions and Anxiety of Using Technology in the Classroom (Part 3)

11/19/2008 9:58 PM

Holy cow. What a well developed and insightful comment. Thanks for taking the time.

__________________
StE - "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer/Hoist with his own petard" -Hamlet Act III, scene 4, 202–209
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 3 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Jaxy (1); Laughing Jaguar (1); ShakespeareTheEngineer (1)

Previous in Blog: Overcoming Inertia: Inhibitions and Anxiety of Using Technology in the Classroom (Part 2)   Next in Blog: Overcoming Inertia: Inhibitions and Anxiety of Using Technology in the Classroom (Part 4)

Advertisement