Sensors & Switches Blog

Sensors & Switches

The Sensors & Switches Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about thermal, mechanical & pressure sensors, optical & ultrasonic sensors, electrical and electromagnetic sensors, and switches and solenoids. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Are You an Energy Scavenger?   Next in Blog: The "Holy Grail" of Process Instrumentation?
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

To Network or Not to Network? That is the Question

Posted September 19, 2008 8:00 AM

Conventional serial links have been the staple for factory monitoring and control. While companies have massive "sunk costs" invested in those serial links, the shift is on to networks of sensors and control elements. An article on the ISA's website makes the case for using the best of both worlds. Such a hybrid approach can take advantage of existing serial-linked sensors and other devices, while knitting them into an overall factory control network.

What's your "take" on this hybrid approach?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Sensors & Switches, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Sensors & Switches today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member China - Member - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CHINA
Posts: 2945
Good Answers: 14
#1

Re: To Network or Not to Network? That is the Question

09/19/2008 9:48 PM

look like as if its selling some product.

no news in it.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TR
Posts: 142
Good Answers: 1
#2

Re: To Network or Not to Network? That is the Question

09/22/2008 2:53 PM

I can't see the advantage with making networked the legacy systems, one would have to buy lots of converters/interfaces and additional software overhead.

It would be more cost effective, re-projecting the whole system with brand new instruments while thinking of system reliability together.

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - EE from the the Wilds of Pa.

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: middle of nowhere, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2603
Good Answers: 63
#3

Re: To Network or Not to Network? That is the Question

10/15/2008 2:26 PM

A minor problem with your question. While we all know that the various bus sytems now available are rapid, aren't they all technically still a serial system (i.e. all data flows on one set of conductors). Of the majors I have used, Ethernet, Foundation Fieldbus, Profibus, DeviceNet, Remote I/O, all are 2 wire systems save the DeviceNet which has 4, but 2 are for power not communication. None are a parallel system.

If I understand the concept you are presenting in "hybrid systems", this hybrid approach is being used even on many new systems in the pharmaceutical industry for remote mounted process skids. A network connects the skid processor to the plant distributed control system, but the skid itself is automated more typical of a 1980's era automated system. Few networks end up on these. A few majors have gone to FF through the heirarchy down to the instruments on the local process skid level, but as stated earlier, many end the network at the skid level and connect the skid instrumentation to a local processor with individual cables from each of the instruments to the processor - no network routing with local drop offs. It makes for much easier check out of the process skid at the skid manufacturer, since no network connection is required to operate it. Just fire up the processor and put the instruments through their required testing. Conversly, the system with the network through to the skid level instruments makes for easier quicker construction at the skid manufacturer, as a local processor is usually omitted from the skid package and becomes a plant mounted item serving many local skids, leaving only a "glorified junction box" to build for the skid.

__________________
Remember when reading my post: (-1)^½ m (2)^½
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 3 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

cnpower (1); feridun (1); Phys (1)

Previous in Blog: Are You an Energy Scavenger?   Next in Blog: The "Holy Grail" of Process Instrumentation?

Advertisement