Aerospace Blog Blog

Aerospace Blog

The Aerospace Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about aeronautics, astronautics, fixed-wing aircraft, future space travel, satellites, NASA, and much more.

Previous in Blog: Water on the Moon   Next in Blog: No Longer a Dream?
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

The Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

Posted December 02, 2009 12:01 AM by moorec74

Hello again, CR4! It's moorec74 back and ready for action. As you may remember from my previous blog entries, I'm an aeronautical and mechanical engineering major at RPI. When people hear "aeronautical," they often associate my degree with airplanes – but this isn't necessarily the case.

This semester, I've been taking a class called "Rotorcraft Performance, Stability, and Control" to prepare myself for my capstone project in the spring – so I've learned about helicopters far more than airplanes. The main criterion that distinguishes a rotorcraft from a regular airplane is that it is capable of VTOL (vertical take-off and landing). Recently, I researched the Black Hawk helicopter and found it so fascinating that I thought I'd share a bit with you.

We need more fire power!

In 1972, during Vietnam War, the United States realized that it needed a more reliable and survivable attack helicopter to perform military missions. The Pentagon proposed the UTTAS competition, or the Utility Tactical Transport Aircraft System contest.

Sikorsky rose to the challenge and entered its Black Hawk design into the fray. A prototype was built in 1974, and was selected as the winner by the U.S. Army in 1976. The Black Hawk beat several innovative designs, including Boeing's Vertol YUH-61. The Black Hawk, designated as the UH-60, replaced the UH-1 Iroquois (the "Huey") and entered service in 1979.

The Introduction of the Black Hawk

The Black Hawk is the military-model member of the S-70 family. Its purposes include but are not limited to the transport of troops, electronic warfare, and aeromedical evacuation. There are many other variations of this specialized helicopter for different uses. Some of the most common variants of the Black Hawk include the Seahawk, Pave Hawk, and Jayhawk. Other countries continue to use the design, too, including Columbia, Israel, Mexico, and Turkey.

The UH-60L, the model that I'll discuss for the remainder of this blog entry, can carry 14 troops or 6 stretchers with a crew of two pilots. Empty, it weighs just over 10,000 pounds; loaded, approximately 22,000 pounds. It can take off at a maximum weight of 23,500 pounds.

The main rotor consists of four fully-articulated blades with a standard swash plate. It includes elastomeric bearings and blade dampers. The 53.67-feet diameter blades are made of titanium and fiberglass, giving it a disc area of 2,260 square feet. The tail rotor, designed to be a pusher type, also has four blades made of similar materials.

Because it is meant to be carried aboard the C-130 Hercules airplane, the Black Hawk has a long, low profile so that it can fit manageably. Its foldable tail boom and other easily-stored limbs make it an excellent fit as well. The Black Hawk's fuselage (therefore not including the rotors) is under 65-feet long, less than 8-feet wide, and stands just over 16 feet high.

It's a bird! It's a plane! It's a…Black Hawk?

While the Black Hawk can almost reach 160 knots, it usually cruises around 150 knots. It can climb at a rate of 700 ft/min and with power to mass ratio of 0.192 hp/lb. Its maximum range is also 1,400 miles, and has a combat radius of 368 miles. It can climb as high as 19,000 feet.

Ready for War

The Black Hawk has some intriguing mechanical features. Its main landing gear system can absorb a crash landing of up to 38 ft/s. Its active vibration control system mechanically generates vibrations that are out of phase with the main rotor to decrease the noise felt at the hub of the blades. It has a ballistically-tolerant flight control system, and its structure and drive system are obviously rated for warfare. Every gearbox on the craft can even sustain flight for 30 minutes without oil! (Imagine if your cars could do that?)

The fuel system and pilot seating are very crashworthy; valves, fuel lines, and fuel cells will breakaway from the helicopter to avoid explosion. In case severe damage does occur during flight, the cockpit doors are jettisonable – the entire doorframe will fall away from the vehicle if the pilot believes it is necessary for survival. And the Black Hawk's IHIRSS (Improves Hover Infrared Suspension System) offers better survivability from heat seeking missile attacks.

And of course, it carries plenty of gun power. The Black Hawk can hold machine guns, mini-guns, or gatling guns with an optional VOLCANO minefield dispersal system. Stub wings are located on the fuselage as an external support system. They can carry extra fuel tanks or more armament, depending on the mission at hand - even rockets or laser-guided missiles.

While airplanes are very appealing, I have found helicopters (and particularly the Black Hawk) to be very interesting pieces of machinery. I hope you have enjoyed this blog entry. Next semester, I'll be back with my adventures of designing my own rotorcraft!

References:

Leishman, J. Gordon. Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics. Cambridge Aerospace Series. 2002.

"UH-60 Black Hawk." Wikipedia. 2009.

http://www.sikorsky.com/

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Commentator
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Automotive Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Optical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: IN
Posts: 99
Good Answers: 1
#1

Re: The Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

12/02/2009 10:43 PM

That was some great insights into the landing gear design limits. Would love to learn more of that component in specific.

__________________
Ron George
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - Time to take control United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Posts: 2129
Good Answers: 87
#2

Re: The Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

12/03/2009 12:03 AM

Interesting post.

When I read 38 ft/s it didn't seem like a very high figure. That's the velocity an object would have being dropped from about 22.4 ft (time=1.181 sec = v/a = 38ft/s / 32.174 ft/s/s and distance=0.5 (v*t)). While hat may seem like a reasonable distance to crash from and for all I know it is for helicopters, the value 38 ft/s just didn't seem higer.

If I'm not mistaken in fixed wing aircraft a hard landing is considered landings in excess of 800 ft/s. And this is where I realized in fact I am mistaken.....it's not 800 ft/s.....it's 800 ft/m which is 13.33 ft/s. Now 38 ft/s seems impressive and correlates better with being dropped from 22 ft.

__________________
J B
Reply
Participant

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2
#3

Re: The Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

12/03/2009 4:04 AM

I too am very interested in rotorcraft and i'm looking into building a scaled working model of the UH-60 "Blackhawk" and I was hoping to find design specs somewhere on the internet but my search has been unsuccessful to this point. I've been researching this project for several months now and have most of the internal controls, motors, and electronics necessary for controlled flight of the aircraft. I would be greatful for any assistance i can get.

Reply
Associate
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 26
#5
In reply to #3

Re: The Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

12/03/2009 10:25 AM

Unfortunately, most of the research I did for my course work was simply from Wikipedia or Sikorsky's site, nothing too in depth. I don't have the necessary details to build a model of this amazing machine...yet. Check back in the spring, because my capstone project next semester will require me and a few fellow classmates to design and build a small rotorcraft (which may be of similar design to what you are looking to do)...and I'll be telling CR4 all about it!

Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwestern United States
Posts: 843
Good Answers: 76
#4

Re: The Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

12/03/2009 9:00 AM

Thanks for the post. Having just returned from Iraq a little over a month ago, I am intimately familiar with the Blackhawk. About 60% of our missions required travel by this wonderful piece of equipment and I am glad that it's design elements have intrigued the mind of a future engineer.

Good luck with your studies and maybe someday an engineering student in the future will be writing a blog about one of your designs. That's the great thing about engineering... we pass our knowledge on through our creations.

JavaHead

__________________
Reuters - Investigators found that the recent thread derailment in CR4 was caused by over-weight creatures of lore and request that membership DON'T FEED THE TROLLS.
Reply
Anonymous Poster
#6

Re: The Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

12/03/2009 3:40 PM

Yes, your findings concerning the landing gear capability to absorb loading is very interesting. The 38/fps velocity = 2,280 fpm velocity may correspond also to autorotation gone bad! Normal autorotation recovery will turn available rotor energy into the ability to slow rate of descent immediately prior to landing. This is accomplished by reducing collective to minimum during the autorotative descent (with not to exceed rotor rpm as limitation to collective pitch reduction). Timing of the pitch increase at the bottom of the autorotation is imperitive for successful arresting of the rate of descent, though. Mess that up and impact with the ground is going to be abrupt and will spread the skids on aircraft so equipped, or use up all the absorption quality of the struts on aircraft with landing gear.

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#7

Re: The Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk

08/30/2010 12:41 PM

hay

moorec74 i work on the UH-60 Black Hawk and i can tell you that you are off about a few things. One theres a flight crew or four and no less (two pilots and teo crew chefs). Two the weight of the acft empty is closer to 15,000 lbs (or at least mine are). Three the tail rotor has two PADDLES not four blades. Four the fuel system does not break away from the acft it just brakes away from anything that can catch it on fire. The engines will be smothered by the fire supression system in the event of a crash. Five the door frame is not jettisonable just the door is. Six it is called a HIRSS (HEAT AND INFRARED SUPPRESSION SYSTEM). Seven what you refer to as the "stub wings" are realls called ESSS (exturnal storage support system).

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); Handyman26 (1); JavaHead (1); JBTardis (1); moorec74 (1); Ron George (1)

Previous in Blog: Water on the Moon   Next in Blog: No Longer a Dream?

Advertisement