Okay, so the front brakes are said to handle 80% of the braking load, albeit that that can be altered slightly by stability controls and other design and coincidental factors. And yes, the brake load differential makes it possible to use really low grade brakes on the rear. But my question, in relation to the 2008 Taurus (the Boeing Ford 500--piece of crap) is, what "normal" operational things could be causing the rear brakes to wear as rapidly as if they were carrying 60, or 70 or more percent of the overall braking load. (My last brake job was at about 100K but that was a pickup--I realize car brakes are nowhere near as durable--but I still should get well above average life time from brakes - I don't accelerate toward stops. I suspect that most (90% plus) of the rear brake wear I have now happened in Colorado before I purchased the car--so maybe driving in hills could alter that 80:20 ratio? But how?
A concurrent problem is the abnormally rapid deposition of brake dust (to me it seems kind of greasy for dust) - a few outings and the rear wheels need cleaning, lest they be damaged. The front...very seldom...for only a light coating. Ford says don't worry and just keep cleaning, and replacing rear brakes--all is normal.
They have told be - I guess out of pity - they will allow me to inspect and take photos during the upcoming rear brakes teardown.
Any thought about how this so called non-problem could be normal? And what I should look for? Thanks
|
Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers: