Challenge Questions Blog

Challenge Questions

Stop in and exercise your brain. Talk about this month's Challenge from Specs & Techs or similar puzzles.

So do you have a Challenge Question that could stump the community? Then submit the question with the "correct" answer and we'll post it. If it's really good, we may even roll it up to Specs & Techs. You'll be famous!

Answers to Challenge Questions appear by the last Tuesday of the month.

Previous in Blog: Styrofoam Slide (May 2015)   Next in Blog: Apollo 11 Communications Log- Gimbal Lock: Newsletter Challenge (July 2015)
Close
Close
Close
27 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

Posted June 01, 2015 12:00 AM
Pathfinder Tags: challenge question

This month's Challenge Question: Specs & Techs from IHS Engineering360:

This month we had the largest automotive recall in U.S. history: 33.8 million vehicles made by 11 different automakers were recalled due to malfunctioning frontal airbags. These airbags were made by the parts supplier Takata. So, let's think about airbags for this month's challenge question.

We know that airbags are very soft inflatable devices; during a crash the airbag is the best accessory to save a life. The question this month is: Why? Why do airbags save lives? It is not enough to say that lives are saved during a crash because the airbags are soft devices. I am looking here at the physics that supports this notion.

And the answer is:

Let's assume, for instance, that a car is moving at 60 mph and crashes into a tree. A passenger in the front seat, before the crash, is moving at 60 mph. At the time of the crash their body will stop (normally by hitting the dash of the car, if there is no airbag). So the passenger momentum will change from mv to 0, where v = 60 mph.

Now, in order to change momentum, according to Newton, a force needs to act for a given amount of time. This concept is a consequence of Newton's second law, which is stated as follows

F = ma

where a is the acceleration of an object of mass m and F is the force generated by this acceleration. We know that acceleration is a change in velocity/time, so we can write the above expression as follows

and finally,

The expression on the left is called the impulse. So the impulse is equal to the change in momentum. t is the time we must apply the force F in order to produce a change in momentum.

The equation can be written as,

In the case of the crash in a car without airbags, at the moment of the crash the passenger will start moving at 60 mph toward the dash. At the very moment that the passenger hits the dash, a force F will be applied by the dash to the passenger (Newton's first law) and in practically zero time (because the dash does not subside) the speed of the passenger goes to zero. Looking at the last equation, we see that the force the dash is applying to the passenger is almost infinity. This, of course, will kill the passenger.

If airbags are available, the passenger will hit the airbag instead of the dash. As soon as the passenger hits the airbag, a force F will be applied to the passenger by the bag, but because the airbag is flexible this force will be applied during a finite time (not zero). This is the time measured from the moment the passenger touches the bag until the speed of the passenger is zero. Because the time is not zero, we see from the above equation that the force is not infinity.

Therefore airbags save lives because they allow the force used to stop the speed of the passenger to act for a certain period of time.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
3
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: About 4000 miles from the center of the earth (+/-100 mi)
Posts: 9910
Good Answers: 1141
#1

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/01/2015 6:15 AM

Energy = force x distance. The driver has kinetic energy E = .5 * m*v^2. The greater distance he can travel coming to a stop, the less the force. The airbag gives him a greater stopping distance than the windshield.

force = (.5*m*v^2)/stopDistance

Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
4
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#2

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/01/2015 6:34 AM

It provides a controlled deceleration over a relatively long distance by deflating at a controlled rate after it's initial rapid deployment.

Rather than your head decelerating over an inch or two as it hits the steering wheel.

If you want numbers, you need to look at the distance between torso and steering wheel, typical speed, mass of upper torso, g force a human can withstand and then do a load of tests.

Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Texas.Baytown
Posts: 697
Good Answers: 26
#3

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/01/2015 6:44 AM

I think a properly adjusted harness is more effective than an airbag. How many race cars have air bags?

__________________
If you want to know how well a broom works you do not ask the guy selling the broom or the guy who designed the broom, you ask the guy using the broom.
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 16512
Good Answers: 670
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/01/2015 7:07 AM

Yeah, but they have helmets, neck braces etc...

Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - EE from the the Wilds of Pa.

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: middle of nowhere, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2603
Good Answers: 63
#11
In reply to #3

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 11:15 AM

How many "soccer moms" are going to put on a full racing harness? I used to drag race and believe me, that is a pain to hook up every time you get in. A necessary pain, but still a mess. Then when you change drivers - re-adjustment of every belt.

My wife can't even tolerate head rests - she has modified her car so they are effectively not effective. (reversed it so it sits way behind her head) I won't drive her car now.

Basically so many people can't be bothered with safety devices, we have had to engineer ones they can't avoid using. Unfortunately, some of them are now killing us instead of saving us.

__________________
Remember when reading my post: (-1)^½ m (2)^½
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 930
Good Answers: 31
#22
In reply to #3

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/03/2015 7:24 PM

Race cars get bumped about and the last thing they need is an air bag in the face entering a turn even if it is a left hand turn.

__________________
The fine line between cuddling and holding one down to prevent escape must be learned
Reply
7
Guru
Engineering Fields - Optical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Trantor
Posts: 5363
Good Answers: 647
#5

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/01/2015 8:04 AM

The airbag does 2 related things simultaneously:

1) It provides a deceleration force needed to keep the passengers' heads from hitting the windshield, steering wheel, or dashboard with a large impact force. (Rixter has this part correct in response #1), and

2) It provides this forces by means of a soft bag that conforms to the face and upper torso, thus spreading the force out over a large area so that no single area of the upper body experiences a massive pressure point, as (for example) the driver's head would if it hit the rim of the steering wheel.

__________________
Whiskey, women -- and astrophysics. Because sometimes a problem can't be solved with just whiskey and women.
Reply Good Answer (Score 7)
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#6

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/01/2015 12:35 PM

A better question would be why are airbags not really that effective at saving lives....

"during a crash the airbag is the best accessory to save a life."

I would like to know the source of this dubious statement....or did you just make it up?

"While the value of airbags seems dubious in the new study, the value of seatbelts is not. The analysis found that proper use of a seatbelt reduces the odds of death by 67 percent for any given speed category and airbag availability. Airbags, however, cause no statistical difference in car-crash deaths, except for unseatbelted occupants at low speeds, where the odds of death are estimated to be more than four times higher with an airbag than without."

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2005-06-airbags-probability-death-accidents.html#jCp

"Instead of reporting all 2,873 claims involving deaths or injury over the 11-year period, the audit found that Honda told ­NHTSA only about claims that had been denied. The 1,729 it failed to report were those it paid and counted as warranty claims. One of the incidents involved a death."

Frontal airbags for over 12 yrs old front seat ...effectiveness rating is 14%

3-point seatbelt for driver effectiveness rating 48% right side front seat 37%...

" In 2013, 21,132 occupants died in motor vehicle traffic crashes. Of the 21,132 passenger vehicle occupants killed, 9,777 were known to be restrained. Restraint use was not known for 1,775 of the occupants. Looking at only occupants where the restraint status was known, 49 percent were unrestrained at the time of the crash."

So 51% were wearing seatbelts...?

http://www.nhtsa.gov/NCSA

http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/811206.pdf

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/trafficandcommuting/honda-says-it-didnt-report-1729-faulty-air-bags/2014/11/24/ed8ac818-7415-11e4-9c9f-a37e29e80cd5_story.html

This speaks to the unintended consequences of safety devices that cause injury and death..."First, do no harm."

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#16
In reply to #6

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 3:17 PM

I would say that death cannot be avoided in certain crashes, regardless of restraint. How does one put those into a slot/category. Real people live, and real people die, and their lives matter as much as any of us. They are God's property, not the government's property.

The government cannot, will not, and is incapable of protecting all people from all risk at all times. Good government governs the least amount to accomplish the majority of agreed upon goals (the will of the people). So we vote for the rules, and even if the rules applies to us, that does not make a person compliant with the rule. Also, we do not put a person to death for not wearing a seatbelt, as an example of onerous punishment that does not "fit the crime", any more than in a civilization, we do not punish sexual assault victims for being assaulted, but we DO punish the offenders.

Henry David Thoreau, was he not the one who stated, "The best government shall be the one that governs the least?" Unfortunately, that government could only exist in a world filled with free, salient, cognizant, logical beings that never deviate from what is true, good, beneficial, healthy, or safe. Not sure I would want to exist in that world either, due to death from sheer boredom.

In the end, if the good (lives saved that go on to reproduce, or accomplish other great good) outweighs the bad (lives that were lost for no apparent reason other than a parts failure), then I suspect automotive engineers have indeed done their jobs reasonably well. However, truth demands improvement, truth demands recompense for wrongs done in secret, and truth demands a change in course.

One would prefer to only be harmed or maimed or killed when engaging in a risky sport where bystanders and co-traffic are not involved. One would prefer that a routine trip to the grocery store or to pick up Johnny at school, could predictably be the most boring and safe of activities there is, and with a 100% likelihood of completely the trip safe and unharmed. We just have to figure which planet that is on and go there. Earth in the future?

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Reply Score 2 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 507
#23
In reply to #16

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/04/2015 12:49 PM

even so if big brother is waqtching

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Australia.
Posts: 1642
Good Answers: 81
#7

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 3:47 AM

Energy cannot be created or destroyed, it can only be converted. Therefore an air bag converts the Kinetic energy of the driver into potential energy as air pressure in the bag when the mass of the driver is decelerated, then the pressure in the bag is released into the surrounding air. The conversion of energy has prevented injury to the driver.

Regards JD.

Reply
4
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 623
Good Answers: 33
#8

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 6:19 AM

"during a crash the airbag is the best accessory to save a life."

When people make statements such as this, it makes me wonder why they would say such a thing while ignoring a bunch of factors they did not consider such as:

crash bars under the hood

bumpers

collapsible fenders

guard rails

helmets

neck braces

car seats

seat belts / harnesses

a well built vehicle

quick thinking / good driving

Sometimes airbags do more harm than good. Some people intentionally turn them off. They may be helpful in a lot of cases. But I would not say they are the best.

__________________
Hey Isaac, catch! ...oops, that's gonna leave a mark...
Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 206
Good Answers: 5
#9

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 8:18 AM

m(v2 - v1) = F(t2 - t1)

During any collision, there is a change in momentum for each body involved in the collision. The change in momentum for the driver, m(v2 - v1) is equal to the impulse F(t2 - t1). Increasing the time (t2 - t1) that it takes to change his momentum reduces the force required.

For example, it would take one-tenth as much force to stop an object in 0.1 seconds as it would to stop the same object (going the same velocity) in 0.01 seconds.

__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in the world.... Those who use binary code, and those who don't.
Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Madison, WI.
Posts: 2074
Good Answers: 77
#10

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 8:53 AM

Not wanting to get into the math on this one.

I agree with several posters here as I have driven and crashed a race car. The requirement that you have a five point harness and a helmet is pretty much standard. The need for Roll cages and braced drivers compartment, a seat that is a bear to get in and out of, helmet straps, arm straps neck collar, are all part of what makes a race care safe and are all things no soccer mom is going to want to deal with. Just see mom crawling in and out the window…. LOL and you thought getting a squirming three year old into a car seat was tough!

Just getting folks to use seatbelts seems to be a real challenge to this day. (How many remember the Power shoulder belts?) So the idea of airbags was the next logical step to the insurance companies who through financial means require them regardless of their dubious effectiveness.

Anyone remember the Stalone movie "Demolition Man"?

http://s00.yaplakal.com/pics/pics_original/0/4/8/2489840.jpg

"My car turned into a canoli"! This has always tickled my imagination. I am not sure how it would actually work, but the theory that making you an immovable piece of the car to protect you from the residual deceleration, car stopped, face continued on for another 24" at 70mph before contacting the steering wheel, fatality. Granted doing so then causes your internals to still suffer. Not sure how we could prevent those internal injuries though. It was funny in the movie though.

__________________
Knowing is the end result of learning, not believing.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#12

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 11:41 AM

The only real safety device is one that avoids a collision in the first place...

__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 206
Good Answers: 5
#13

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 11:50 AM

About 10 years ago, I fell asleep at the wheel of my 1991 Lincoln Towncar and crashed headlong into a huge boulder. The boulder didn't budge. The car was totaled. My son and I walked away essentially unharmed. We both had seatbelts on and the driver's side airbag deployed. I'm sure we would have had head injuries and broken bones if we hadn't been buckled in.

__________________
There are 10 kinds of people in the world.... Those who use binary code, and those who don't.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 507
#14

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 12:35 PM

the airbag stops the motion of the head and/or body in case of an accident, like the safety belt does too!´

the human body can't be injured if he is not moving and touching the car interieur.

the acceleration in case of an accident is higher than the human body allows (and higher as an astronaut ever reaches -the car has to stop at a distance of 1m from a speed usually 108km/h=30m/s to zero, mean acceleration is 450m/s² =45g).

BUT: the airbag is not an AÍRBAG - there's not air in the bag, it is gas from an explosion! and this explosion touches your face! the gas is not breathable.

Reply
2
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#15

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 2:56 PM

Impulse reduction is the result of an air bag quickly deploying, then deflating at a rate slower than the rate at which the vehicle decelerates. In this manner, the person being protected experiences less G shock (impulse) than would otherwise be the case. Not only that, but the pressure of any impulse is lessened by spreading out the force over a much larger area, so the head is not accelerated into something the size of a golf ball or less.

Pressure is force per unit area. Pressure impulse is force time per unit area. Pressure impulse is that which kills. F=ma, F=mdv/dt, Fdt=mdv, thus impulse is seen as the change in momentum over a sliver of time dt. Pressure impulse: Fdt/A=mdv/A, thus it is very clear that larger area scales the pressure impulse down to "manageable" levels.

This says nothing related to the recent deaths caused by sudden deployment of Takata airbags. (1a) If airbag deploys while the passenger/driver is not under sudden deceleration, and head not resting against neck brace, or head turned to the side or slightly to the rear, I suspect a coups'-contra coups' injury to the brain (concussion), which could induce a hemorrhaging failure in the grey matter ensues from sudden impact. (1b) If the driver/passenger's head is turned, then a broken cervical vertebra and severed spinal cord could result, in the event of sufficient impulse pressure. (2)The driver's vision is blocked, or in some way affected by airbag deployment, resulting in loss of vehicular control - with fatal results. (3)If the driver/passenger is simply stunned, or rendered unconscious, then fatal crash could be a quick result.

It is precisely the way airbags normally deploy, versus the unwanted sudden deployment that results in injuries and/or fatalities from such events. Normal deployment will not force the occupant's head into a coups'-contra coups' motion off the back-rest/neck brace of the seat. A "normal" frontal collision of the vehicle with deployment of the airbag will generally still have the victim moving forward almost exlusively, and this helps the brain not collide so much with the cranial cavity.

I disagree that air bags are in any particular way "soft". Due to the explosive nature of the release of the air bag. The initial contact with the bag may be rather like diving into water from a height of over 3 stories (26 ft for those in Rio Linda), 7.9248 meters if you live in Dusseldorf. This is preferable to hitting something harder and less distributed.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Large hole formally occupied by furry woodland creature.
Posts: 3385
Good Answers: 97
#17

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 5:30 PM

I had the opportunity to witness firsthand the compression of a red rubber dodge ball as it made contact with a fellow gym classmates head. The ball rebounded vertically 30' to hit the ceiling in the gym. meanwhile, the recipient did a reaction-cartwheel and landed on his back. The ball had been propelled by a very large human who was disgruntled due to having to play dodge ball instead of basketball.

I suppose some of the math others have contributed would apply here.

__________________
CRTL-Z
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: by the beach in Florida
Posts: 33392
Good Answers: 1817
#18
In reply to #17

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/02/2015 8:40 PM
__________________
All living things seek to control their own destiny....this is the purpose of life
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hemet, Land of milk and honey.
Posts: 2365
Good Answers: 36
#19
In reply to #18

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/03/2015 8:49 AM

I this video, in can be clearly seen that shirts for fat people do not have blue collars.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Large hole formally occupied by furry woodland creature.
Posts: 3385
Good Answers: 97
#20
In reply to #19

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/03/2015 9:07 AM

Its there, you just cant see it.

__________________
CRTL-Z
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 507
#24
In reply to #20

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/04/2015 12:52 PM

but the speed of the ball depends on the muscles in his arms - not in the fatness of his body!

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Large hole formally occupied by furry woodland creature.
Posts: 3385
Good Answers: 97
#25
In reply to #24

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/04/2015 1:01 PM

True, but the follow-through is increased dramatically.

__________________
CRTL-Z
Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 1
#21

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/03/2015 3:54 PM

Airbags are part of the SRS (Safety Restraint System). It is in fact the seatbelts that do more work in saving people. Modern seatbelts have different features on them depending on the make and model of the car and the make of the seatbelt. One of these features is the taking up of the slack in the belt before a controlled explosion within the mechanism of the ratchet (the reel) causes the belt to pull tight on your body pinning you in your seat helping to stop you moving forward when the impact happens.

The airbag itself is more of a secondary safety device to help prevent you having a brain injury banging your head off the steering wheel, being the closest thing to the driver at any time. The cushion disperses the energy created by the body being thrown forward against the steering wheel. I, having worked in the business for over 20 years now, have long debated whether a passenger bag is of any consequence, as if the seatbelt (worn properly) does it's job of pinning you in your seat, a person's body should never make it as far as the dashboard. A full cavity airbag to fill the cabin area between the dash, windscreen pillars and the two front occupants of the car would be a far more effective system to slow down a persons forward movement.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Etherville
Posts: 12362
Good Answers: 115
#26

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/06/2015 8:11 AM

It is not enough to say that lives are saved during a crash because the airbags are soft devices. I am looking here at the physics that supports this notion.

What ?

I could mention that people drive more crazy because they have airbags. No, you ask physical reasons. There are documented cases of people suffocating when the airbag explodes. Airbags are also a common theft itme - bad news for the driver.

Airbags do in fact kill people, but that's not the question.

Given a choice, I'd rather have my face and body deccelerate at a longer time. Bit like Sly Stalone in that film where his car explodes in foam.

It's not even fact that airbags do save lives.

__________________
For sale - Signature space. Apply on self addressed postcard..
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 507
#27
In reply to #26

Re: Airbag Physics: Newsletter Challenge (June 2015)

06/06/2015 11:25 PM

they are still living on the moon to make (more) money

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 27 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

airbags ireland (1); James Stewart (2); jdretired (1); Kris (1); Massey (1); Phys (1); rashavarek (1); Rixter (1); roy hammy (1); SolarEagle (3); texasron (1); tonyhemet (1); tribefan1952 (2); Unredundant (3); Usbport (1); user-deleted-1105 (2); WilhelmHKoen (4)

Previous in Blog: Styrofoam Slide (May 2015)   Next in Blog: Apollo 11 Communications Log- Gimbal Lock: Newsletter Challenge (July 2015)

Advertisement