Login | Register
The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion®


Aerospace Blog

The Aerospace Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about aeronautics, astronautics, fixed-wing aircraft, future space travel, satellites, NASA, and much more.

Previous in Blog: MaSu on Mozzies:The Search for Plans   Next in Blog: Aviation Records
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







15 comments

The Attack of the Space Junk

Posted October 31, 2007 11:52 AM by M&M_aero
Pathfinder Tags: NASA satellites space junk

With the recent launch of another spacecraft, let's step back and consider all of the man-made objects in outer space. The Mars Rover and the International Space Station (ISS) are significant technical accomplishments, and hundreds of satellites help us to complete everyday tasks such as placing long-distance phone calls. But then there is the debris left over from our many explorations into space. This stuff is better known as space junk.

Today, more then 9000 pieces of space junk are orbiting the Earth. This debris zooms around the planet at speeds up to 25,000 miles per hour, which is equivalent to 36,666 feet per second! With so much debris moving at such a high rate of speed, a collision could be catastrophic. Under these conditions, a 1-mm metal chip can do as much damage as a .22 caliber rifle bullet. A piece the size of a pea is as dangerous as a 400 lb. safe falling at 60 mph, while a metal sphere the size of a tennis ball is as lethal as 25 sticks of dynamite!

What does this mean for astronauts? Well, depending on the space junk's size and point of impact, even a pea-size piece could penetrate a spacecraft and cause serious damage. A tennis-ball sized piece would penetrate and seriously damage - if not destroy - an entire spacecraft. NASA worries about space debris so much that mission control has changed a shuttle's flight path to avoid pea-sized debris. On several occasions, astronauts have also had to replace windows on the International Space Station. These windows were damaged by a single flake of paint.

By now, you're probably wondering what all of this space junk is and how it got there. Well, the simple answer is this - we put it there. Some of the debris is from old satellites that were left in orbit until they exploded from left-over fuel and other high pressure fluids. Space junk also includes loosened paint-chips from the hundreds of objects in orbit, jettisoned spacecraft parts, nuts and bolts, solar cells, nuclear reactor cores, solid fuel fragments, and much more. Unfortunately, new debris is formed every day as objects collide with each other and break apart.

So what can we do about this? The current (and blunt) answer is this - not much. The best solution would be to remove large, obsolete objects from orbit; however, there is no inexpensive way to do this. Other ideas include attaching tethers to objects in order to slow them down and force them to fall back to Earth, forcing newly-launched satellites to have engines that can direct them back to Earth at the end of their life span, and using ground based lasers to disrupt satellite orbits. But none of these ideas seems practical. In the meantime, the United States Space Command (USSPACECOM) is monitoring the debris, using radar and "electronic eyes" to track space junk.

The risks posed by debris in outer space worries NASA and the astronauts who bravely put their lives on the line. Although this debris is monitored carefully, the world needs a way to greatly minimize - if not eliminate - the debris that we create. The junk yard orbiting planet Earth needs to be cleaned up, but there are no trash compactors or incinerators in space. What should we do?

CR4 Aerospace Blog

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

10/31/2007 12:09 PM

Drop it all into the northern Pacific. It would be company for all that floating plastic garbage.

Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevemelito
Posts: 3506
Good Answers: 32
#2

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

10/31/2007 12:18 PM

When I was a kid, there was TV show called Salvage 1. In it, a junk man (Andy Griffith) said "I'm gonna build a spaceship, go to the moon, salvage all the junk that's up there, bring it back and sell it." Sometimes the facts need to follow fiction - and not just for Washington politicians. My vote is to let private companies bid on the right to salvage space junk. The companies with the lowest bids can then assume the risks and reap rewards of such an operation.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Earth - I think.
Posts: 946
Good Answers: 58
#6
In reply to #2

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/01/2007 3:30 AM

"The Man Who Sold The Moon" Ehh (R.A.H.)! I agree. Motivated self interest, short circuits a lot of unnecessary rules and regulations.

__________________
TANSTAAFL (If you don't know what that means, Google it - yourself)
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - Scapolie, new member.

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1058
Good Answers: 8
#10
In reply to #2

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/01/2007 8:31 AM

Hi Moose. Long time no talk, anyway here go's. Everywhere in the course of the advancement of technology we humans have left a lot of junk lying around, so this is nothing new. That the junk this time is out in space gives me cause for alarm as it would anybody else.

What are we to do about it? We as yet havn't developed a space junk collecting agency, maybe this is the way ahead? If we can send rockets to the Moon and indeed Mars, it cannot be a big problem to organise a space junk collecting service like those we have on Earth. Lets give it a go and see what happens? Spencer.

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8728
Good Answers: 100
#3

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

10/31/2007 2:09 PM

On a news or documentary about 10 - 15 years ago. Nasa had a department that tracked this space junk, (if that department survived budget cuts.) I do not know how small they track, when they showed a screen of it, and it was pretty bad with just the U.S. and Russia as major players, now with the number of players, I can only guess.

__________________
phoenix911
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 300
Good Answers: 4
#5
In reply to #3

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/01/2007 12:03 AM

They still track it and I read the number of pieces was up to 800,000 give or take a few

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 30°30'N, 97°45'W, Elv: 597 ft.
Posts: 2525
Good Answers: 11
#4

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

10/31/2007 6:59 PM

I have heard of this for many years now. How fitting that soon our outer space will reflect our inner space

__________________
I never apologize. I'm sorry that's just the way I am.
Reply
Associate

Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 53
Good Answers: 2
#7
In reply to #4

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/01/2007 5:56 AM

Yes thats true. The outer space reflect our ineer space indeed. It will get worst when China, Japan, India and other space wannabees join this space orchestra. To prevent the worsening of that space junk mess, we are better off to start cleaning right away and show some sense of responsibility for a global community. I dont know how to collect and get rid of junk and it seems to be an impossible task but I believe it is doable. May I suggest some ideas for it. Why not use the same aerogel that was used to collect a comet dust. And instead of bringing it back to earth, sent it toward the sun to be burned.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A secret. Bats are a Protected Species.
Posts: 256
Good Answers: 4
#9
In reply to #7

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/01/2007 8:03 AM

Over time it will get rid of itself. Orbits decay and atmospheric drag takes over. Did you hear the one about the municipality in Western Australia that raised a fine for NASA for littering when bits of Skylab splattered all over it?

__________________
Innuendo is not Italian for a suppository.
Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 73
#8

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/01/2007 7:31 AM

Of course, it's a serious and dangerous problem. But, do you really expect a government who sticks it's head in the sand over global warming and tries to gag NASA's report on airspace safety is going to suddenly become morally responsible and throw $billions at the problem. I think not.

__________________
Emergency night landings...as you approach the ground, turn on your landing lights. If you like what you see, leave 'em on. If not...turn 'em off.
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: A secret. Bats are a Protected Species.
Posts: 256
Good Answers: 4
#11

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/01/2007 9:40 AM

"Oh, my Old Man's a dustman

He wears a dustman's hat

He wears cor-blimey trousers

And he lives in a Council flat.

I say, I say, I say."

"What do you say?"

"Did you know I've got space junk in my dustbin?"

"How do you know it's space junk?"

"Isn't everything?"

__________________
Innuendo is not Italian for a suppository.
Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - Scapolie, new member.

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1058
Good Answers: 8
#12
In reply to #11

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/01/2007 10:14 AM

A great answer. Spencer.

Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Commentator

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 73
#13

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/02/2007 1:48 PM

First, we gotta build a giant vacuum cleaner to suck it all up. What??? It'll work! I saw it in a cartoon once..honest!

__________________
Emergency night landings...as you approach the ground, turn on your landing lights. If you like what you see, leave 'em on. If not...turn 'em off.
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: third rock from Sol
Posts: 121
#14

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

11/07/2007 6:45 PM

my brother found a piece of my cable system in the driveway last night, a splitter or something, he said "whats this? omg! no wonder the space shuttle won't fly!"

I'm still laughing thinking of chicken little lmao...

__________________
I'm not a real engineer, I just play one on TV
Reply
Participant

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
#15

Re: The Attack of the Space Junk

02/17/2008 9:02 PM

Hello, I would like to begin in saying that I am glad to have found a wed site that will address the need to discuss the ever increasing problem of space Junk. I have a simple idea that has been experimented on in the past by nasa but not in this type of means. The means being generating an electromagnetic field that could not only assist in bringing the rouge satelite in a trajectory of stability rather then tumbling, but allows for the autonomous robot to link onto the unit and bring it under control. This should allow the unit to either be salvaged or cut apart and sent back to earth for disposal.

The key is to create a unit that is big enough to be able to handle some of the bigger objects in space and based on most of the items having some fares metals, the magnetic field can be adjust to artificially control the item. After all, in space the unit would be more excitable to change in this manner then it would be to reach out and try to catch the item manually. Once the item has been contained in the magnetic field, then the speed can be controlled by the recovery unit, then the tumbling can be stooped by a containment field. Once all these has been done, the recovery unit can take action as to what should be done to the item via control commands from ground control

In this becoming a useful means of collection, why not take the more historical items (I.E. Vangard 1) and return them back to earth to become a museum piece, and the rest salvage and refurbish or just recycle. The cost saving of revamping an old unit would be more cost effective then creating a new one in some cases.

Please let me know what you think of my idea, I must confess that my description is vague in detail to fit this blog but I hope the concept has at least been connived.

James Ryan II

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 15 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); EagleAlphaOne (1); Flying boots (2); Hellcat (1); Horrible Old Bat (2); jlryanii (1); Kilowatt0 (1); phoenix911 (1); sail4evr (1); Scapolie (2); Steve Melito (1); TexasCharley (1)

Previous in Blog: MaSu on Mozzies:The Search for Plans   Next in Blog: Aviation Records
You might be interested in: Dust and Debris Control Products, Space Heaters and Room Heaters, GPS Chips