It only measures 4.421" long on my screen. But then again, what do you expect from a governmental entity? Always promising more than they can deliver... =b
The formula gives a single value, whereas the lengths of the arrows are different. I guess that is a case of the draughtsman re-interpreting.
But the originator had a conceptual lapse as well; the formula is direction free, and needs additional support to make any sort of sense. That is why the classical interpretation (the "New Physics" of the "from Copernicus to Newton" title) started from interaction between a field and a mass.
No surprise then that the later editon copped out and simply showed drawings of some of the protagonists.
[I think I'll write a book "Birth of a New Geometry, from Ptolemy to Newton". We are reassuringly free of data in the matter, so I can write almost whatever rubbish I like, and no-one gainsay.]
From the royal mint website:
"The winning artist, Bruce Rushin, an art teacher from Norfolk, based
his design on a series of concentric circles telling the story, through
symbolic devices, of technological development from the Iron Age to the
Industrial Revolution and from the Computer Age to the Internet."
So it's either " 'nuff said" or a two dimensional representation of a three-dimensional arrangement.
(The people at the mint probably knew, but they all know that "it's money makes the world go round"* so why would they worry?
*These days perhaps "go into a spin", so maybe clagged gears would be beneficial.)
It's true that money makes the world go round but as things going with the pound it is not likely that it will continue to go around for much longer, at least out side the UK borders.
__________________
Making mistake is part of learning.
Yes it will rotate. There is a definite pattern to the gearing arrangement, if you take a vertical line down from the letter O in the word pound, the gears are the same left and right, there is an exception of one extra gear on the left, but as it is the same ratio, it should not effect the out come, the only gear that is not part of the pattern (size) is the gear directly below the letter O in the word pound, There are eighteen gears not counting the one below the letter O, therefore the two gears either side of the gear directly below the letter O in the word pound, are rotating in the same direction, therefore the gear between them can be any ratio. I think
Cogs can turn if the axles for some of the gears are on sprung sliders. Such an arrangement with five cogs could convert rotational to linear movement.
(I'm not saying it's a good way to do this in general - just that it could work)
Good Answers:
"Almost" Good Answers: