|
I was watching the 1998 movie "Enemy of the State" the other day, and noticed there was a lot of satellite tracking and GPS location, buildings set up to block the signals, eavesdropping, phone tapping, and discussions of suspending civil rights in the movie. The good guys, acting as bad guys, were after the wrong person of course. It was interesting because this was all pre 9/11, before Homeland Security and heightened scrutiny measures, and these technologies were already in use.
The movie got me thinking about the recent increase in airport security and the actions taken against persons deemed suspicious. They can actually frisk you while using their palms and fingers to probe for anything that may be hidden. If forgoing the pat-down, airport officials can ask passengers to walk through low-level radiation scanners that generate images that look like nude photos.
Are these types of technology a positive thing, as in the case of running off a deserted highway, unconscious, and having the right people finding you like OnStar commercials suggest? Or are these new technologies an invasion of privacy?
For this blogger, it raises questions like: can they tell how fast I am going by my EZPass? If I leave my computer on, will someone be looking through the camera? Do I really want someone tracking my shopping habits? Is Big Brother (1984) really watching through the cameras at the intersection, and checking my email? Am I paranoid or just cautious? Should we be overly concerned if we Twitter or are on Facebook? What do you think?
Recent CR4 articles
Stop Watching Me: Freedom Not Fear 2008
Pour Yourself a Cup of Microsoft's COFEE
|
Good Answers:
"Almost" Good Answers: